Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does TKennedy need to cap his pie-hole...me thinks so

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:24 AM
Original message
Does TKennedy need to cap his pie-hole...me thinks so
It's my opinion that the comments about nothing changing in Abu Ghaib prison since Saddam was disposed was a bit extreme and over the top. To me, and most Americans i would think, this is political slumming at it's worst. I have been appreciative of most of the derogatory comments he has made about Bush and the war but i honestly believe these comments do no one any good. He can decry the action of the military intel gathering techniques without making such exagerated comments.
The soldiers who are there doing an admirable job would be offended and upset by these remarks and i can't say that i blame them.
Also, JKerry will automatically be associated with these comments becasue of his close ties with Kennedy and that can't do him any good.

For those who are going to jump my ass for saying this, these comments are akin to the political grandstanding that someone like TDelay would make if circumstances were reversed. Would we not be a tad bit upset with him? And no, i am not comparing Kennedy to Delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Saddam was supported by Rumsfeld
So what if it's true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
83. KENNEDY ROCKS, he needs to YELL MORE OFTEN!
I LOVE that guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. why don't you provide some quotes

that way people can judge for themselves whether or not to "jump your ass"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. quote
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:32 AM by digno dave
I don't have the EXACT quote so i am not going go there.
It was widely broadcast a couple of days ago...i am sure most of us here have heard it. Someone.....
If you are implying i took it out of context, no, i don't believe i did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. this is pointless
hearsay...without a quote this thread is a waste of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. no shit! If you can't even provide a quote why talk trash?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
107. quote
"Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers have re-opened under new management -- United States management."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #107
113. What's objectionable about that?
We've seen the photos. Those Iraqis were tortured. Hence, it's a torture chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #113
116. nothing objectionable about it, since it's the damn truth

I thought when Saddam was gone there would be no more torture! LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have never been impressed
with Kennedy's brilliance. His main virtue is he can reliably deny that senate seat to a Repug.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes he was grandstanding, but sometimes there has to be
someone on our side to return the punches with the same force they were delivered. Teddy does get carried away sometimes, but I think he's expected to do that, the same way Delay and several other Pubs are expected to do so.

We all know them.. When you see some particular faces approach the mike, you groan and say oh boy, this idiot again.

Let Teddy go. sometimes over the top remarks allow the rest to settle down to the more reasonable midpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. God didn't make little green apples
and it don't rain in Indianapolis

In the summer time..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I love those pictures of your kitties.
Now where is my wok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. whatcha gonna cook in it
your goose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. You're witty and I like that.
Rather than get all outraged at my comment, you responded in the joking spirit in which it was made.

God, I love women who can give it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. venereal disease: the gift that keeps on giving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
49. venereal disease: the gift that keeps on giving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #37
66. That's because
you've never heard her cackle.TMOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:hi:

*cackled CatWoman*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
62. "His" name?
What's the prob, honey, etymology not your forte? You don't think women should be allowed an outflowing of emotion, rage, or what have you? Got to be creative, sweetcakes. -rrhagia meant as a figurative term (that means not necessarily literal).

As for my sig line, you don't like Nader? Is that it?

And finally, my don't we make sexist assumptions? "his"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:03 AM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #62
74. Appasrently, assumptions are quite commonplace on this board...
makes me wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #74
81. Yep.
A lot of assumptions. Not a lot of critical thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
58. Hey, I'm in charge of gratuitous input around here!
Looks like this comes under the heading of my department . . .

{Adjusts hat, saddles up Topper}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #58
90. No slight intended gratuitous... LOL!!!
More power to ya! Go get 'em Sheriff! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #90
98. I figured that
It's only people who want to get on my good side who use the term "jerkwad."

On an unrelated note, I marvel at what some people will do when the carefully constructed fantasy they've surrounded themselves with comes crashing down around their ears. Well, at least they're just trolling internet message boards instead of shooting up neighborhoods.

{Pats Catwoman on the head, kisses horse, rides off into the sunset}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Hrrr, hrrr, hrrr
Objects in mirror may not be as clever as they think they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. comments of your sort just serve to fuel more Bush atrocities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Well that's absurd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alpizzy Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
46. Rainbow - physics 101
red
orange
yellow
green
blue
indigo
violet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Comments like yours emboldened the american army of
empire to conquer more countries for their resources and in the process create more atrocities.

Why do you think its dangerous in america right now for a senator to tell the truth?

Is it better to live a lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
77. That's right
Our goal is to make Iraq our 51st state.

Gotta love the 'imperialism' folks. Sorry, but this ain't the Spanish American War. Your argument would have had some validity if it were 1898.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #77
87. your argument would have validity if PNAC, Halliburton, and Chalabi...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:10 AM by thebigidea
... somehow didn't exist. You might want to peddle your nonsense elsewhere.

Godblessmerica!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. yeah, that's a good way to stifle criticism <sarcasm>
... any criticism of what's going on in Iraq can be painted as "giving more propaganda to al-Qaeda." so let's stop speaking out against whatever The Naked Ape has wrought there, okay? </sarcasm>

btw, the REALITY of the Iraq MESS is fuel enough for al-Qaeda, don't you think? they don't need to listen to TKennedy sound-bites for their material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
91. I just think of that poor beheaded boy and his family
And the professed Al-Queda rationale for committing this horrible crime. These are the thugs that did 9-11, remember? Why on earth would we like to provide them with moral cover for their hideous deeds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #91
95. The whole thing stinks to high heaven
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:18 AM by el_gato
Why the hell are you spewing this "moral cover" line? It's bullshit.

Now as far as Al Queda is concerned, it sure seems to me like they conveniently help bush when he needs it most.

Remember when bush went over to visit tony blair and londoners toppled that statue of bush? Well, whatayaknow, Bombings in Istanbul at the exact right time.

This berg video smells funny if you ask me. Especially considering he was being held by the FBI right before it happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #95
101. It's a fallacious argument
Cut from the same idiotic cloth that if you were against the Iraq invasion, you are a supporter of Saddam Hussein.


Boring and predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #91
120. I have my doubts about that
--the whole world was sympathizing with Iraq after the Abu Ghraid photos and angry at Bush/USA. Why would "al Qaeda" (I use the term hypothetically since I don't really know what or even IF it is) wantonly turn that anger toward themselves? As a Middle Easterner noted in one of the news articles summarizing Arab-world reaction to the beheadings, "it benefited only Bush."

Other anomalies: a Russian speaker among the murderers, saying "do it quickly" or some such in Russian as the knife was drawn, the orange (US-issue) jumpsuit, the lack of thrashing or involuntary drawing away by Berg, the scream dubbed into the tape, the LIE by the US (FBI?) that Berg had not been in US custody, the knife used and style of cutting was NOT Middle Eastern, lack of blood that would go with a true beheading, speculation that Zacqawari (sp?) has been dead since March. I believe that Berg was murdered sometime before the prison photos were released (he was missing before then) and the thing was a psy-ops fake al Qaeda staged "murder by beheading." I think he was beheaded sometime after his death and his body conveniently dumped at the right time to distract from the prison photos. Poor Nick Berg was nothing but damage control for Bush, in my opinion, as well as further incitement of hatred toward anybody Middle Eastern/Iraqi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Oh God. Aren't you on the wrong board?
Puh - leeeeez

Oh, I know. You're being sarcastic. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
59. Gawd, what horseshit. You guys sound
like a broken record. This will aid the enemy. That will give Al CIAda motivation. Why don't you just say what you really want every American to do, just let the Bush cabal kill whomever they want whenever they want, steal whatever oil they want, overthrow any government they want and keep shopping.

Quit with the parrot bullshit, its annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
127. sniff sniff
I smell a troll. This is the same crap all the right wing pundits are trying to cram down our throats. Why don't you visit freerepublic.org ? Your views will fit right in there, sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:34 AM by Q
...if our representatives don't speak out...then no one will. It would seem that some don't want any criticism of this president...even if that criticism is based in fact. What Kennedy said was true. Bush* attacked Iraq...in part...to 'close down' the prisons that tortured prisoners in Saddam's name. Now American troops are torturing in Bush's* name. What the fuck is the difference?

- I'm proud of Kennedy for speaking out and not being afraid of the fascists running this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. There may be SOME truth in his words...
but beleive me, it doesn't help Kerry to have his closest buddy up there saying shit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're the one...
...that's 'saying shit'. That you give a shit what the RWingers think is besides the point. Kennedy has the right and responsibility to say these things. The corporate media sure isn't going to point out the obvious.

- Why would the words of others hurt Kerry? Few here will fall for this guilt by association gambit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. how do you know that it doesn't help?
He's exposing the hypocrisy of the Iraqi Operation ...

I wish more Senators would be as bold as Senators Byrd and Kennedy ... we've been asking for voices since the Coup of 2000 ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Kerry put up Kennedy's last anti Bush speech on his website
so i'm not sure if it hurts kerry in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeSpeechCrusader Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
44. From what you've posted about his comments...
I find them to be truthful, and I do not see them doing harm to Kerry. Someone has to point out the ironic nature of our "liberating Iraq" while still doing atrocious deeds to the citizens that we are supposedly "liberating." And with Kennedy doing it for Kerry, Kerry can continue campaigning positively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gynerrhagia Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. You are essentially saying the tortures represent overall US policy
which you and I know is ridiculous. These atrocites were caused by a group of rogue soldiers coupled with inattention from commanding officers.
Tell me what service Kennedy's remarks perform? Do they assist in the safety of the vast majority of good people in Iraq? Do they help or hurt the cause of Al-Queda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. rut roh
the "rogue soldiers" meme is taking off.

ZOOM...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Its just a few bad apples!
And when I say there were absolutely no orders given to treat prisoners this way, I'm saying that there were a CERTAIN AMOUNT of orders given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
128. The "few bad apples argument"
is like saying that the 9/11 bombers were just a few bad apples and not representative of Al-Qaida as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #128
134. Only illiterates use the "few bad apples" argument
Edited on Thu May-13-04 01:59 PM by sangh0
because it's full meaning reveals that those "few" bad apples end up making ALL of the apples go bad.

If they were truly literate in English, they'd use "bottom of the barrel"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. Anything that will hasten our departure from Iraq...
will be for the good of the Iraqi people. It will likely even help in our fight against Al-Qaeda (provided this misadministartion's attention is finally focused there... and not on plundering Iraq)!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. Can SOMEBODY supply a link to Kennedy's remarks?
From what I've heard from him in the past, he was probably quite correct. You apparently fear that they might hurt the cause of your little president. Good for Senator Kennedy.

And where did you get your name? It sounds like some especially vicious STD.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #45
99. See post 93. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
47. How do you know it was a bunch of rogue soldiers?
Because uncle Rummy said so? This kind of shit happens daily in our own correctional facilities, so its not a stretch to imagine it is widespread in Iraq. Keep in mind that these soldiers have been brainwashed into thinking they are actually fighting terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
50. Can SOMEBODY supply a link to Kennedy's remarks?
From what I've heard from him in the past, he was probably quite correct. You apparently fear that they might hurt the cause of your little president. Good for Senator Kennedy.

And where did you get your name? It sounds like some especially vicious STD.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:48 AM
Original message
Do you honestly believe this invasion has anything to do with helping Iraq

quite naive at best

Saddam was a U.S. sponsored puppet that went rogue just like Noriega.
He was the perfect bogey man given the corporate propaganda that has been shove down the throat of the American people for the past 12 years.

It's kinda funny that when Saddam was actually accused of gassing the Kurds it was Bush Sr. and Rummy who were defending him. It wasn't until he decided to play his own game that this group in the WH turned on him. They didn't give a rats ass about the Iraqi people back then and they don't now.

Here's a good historical primer if you want to start to acutally get informed:

http://fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1992/h920224g.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
54. This invasion has nothing to do with helping the Iraqi people


Saddam was a U.S. sponsored puppet that went rogue just like Noriega.
He was the perfect bogey man given the corporate propaganda that has been shove down the throat of the American people for the past 12 years.

It's kinda funny that when Saddam was actually accused of gassing the Kurds it was Bush Sr. and Rummy who were defending him. It wasn't until he decided to play his own game that this group in the WH turned on him. They didn't give a rats ass about the Iraqi people back then and they don't now.

Here's a good historical primer if you want to start to acutally get informed:

http://fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1992/h920224g.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
64. Wrong again, buffalo breath, it IS policy and you know it.
So GFY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
72. "Rogue Soldiers"
Here we go again with the "rogue soldiers" gambit. Do you really believe that what they did wasn't countenanced by the chain of command.

So 6-8 Army Reservists, none of whom had any experience with the cultural norms of an Islamic people, knew what to do to shame these
men and women. All by themselves they sexually abused women and children, it was their idea to use dogs, which are considered unclean
in the Muslim world, to frighten the prisoners.

The problem with your idea is that LTG Sanchez at the recommendation
of MG Miller, the former commander of GITMO, issued a Fragmentary Order placing the MI Brigade in charge of the prison.

MG Miller was sent to Iraq by Dr Cambone, the SecDef in charge of intelligence, to implement the use of intelligence gathering that
he used while commanding GITMO. MG Miller was there during the time that these abuses took place.

This shows a direct line from Abu Ghraib to the Pentagon, yet only
the reservists are being court martialed, and most of the higher ranking officers only received a slap on the wrist.

As for what Senator Kennedy said, as far as I'm concerned he's right, and he has the right to say it. That's what free speech is all about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. In your opinion the prison has changed substantively how?
There is no way that Ted could ever compete with the reprehensible, prevaricating, treasonous "political slumming" of the wrong wing radical anti-American corporate globalist traitors apologizing for our military's immoral abuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. well, theoretically speaking, i would guess that
fewer people have been killed in that prison in one year than the number in that same time span would have been killed by Saddam. Just an assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. If we're the 'good guys'...we shouldn't be killing anyone...
...especially those under our protection. What the hell is wrong with America when we have to apologize for the Bush* cabal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
48. Right again, Q!
What the hell does the quantity have to do with it?

It the systematic way it happened.

Murder, rape and torture aren't judged on the "golf scale".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Saddam was installed by the CIA and supported by Reagan

so you can't hide behind the "Saddam is a bad man" routine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
79. You're Good at That
Making unsubstantiated "assumptions" So you assume Saddam would've killed 10,000+ innocent Iraqis over the last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
85. Great!.......We're better than Sadaam......
Seems like the bar has been lowered quite a bit since chimpy got selected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
129. A pretty wild-eyed assumption.
Based on "facts" provided by the administration that lied to the UN about WMD and still won't even count the number of civilian casualties in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdbrain Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
136. There you go again.
Why do freepers insist on using Saddam Hussein and/or Al Qaeda as a standard for comparison, i.e., the "at least we're not as bad as Saddam Hussein" argument. What does that make Bush - Saddam Lite?

How many people SHOULD the US government have abused/tortured/killed in Abu Ghraib? Zero! It doesn't matter what anybody else did.

Poof! Be gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. I can remember people worried about Teddy speaking out
Just because he was seen as wealthy.
He probably has a pretty good idea as to where his retoric goes and what effect it might have. We need about 10 more speaking out against the wHouse criminals on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. I don't always agree with Teddy,
but, he's one of the few Dem's on the hill that isn't afraid to stand up to those crackers on the other side of the isle. He's had some good speeches in the past. He's allowed to blow one once in awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. agree
Like i said, for the most part he has been right on when blasting Bush but i think this satement was over the top and miscalculated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. How the hell did he blow it?
- Can you dispute what he said? The fact remains that the very prison that was notorious for torturing Iraqi citizens is now being used by American forces to...torture Iraqi citizens.

- Sometimes the truth has to be said...even if it's painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #36
109. relax
it looks like we have some tag-teaming going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
31. Tell me how this picture is better than what Saddam did


Sarah Haider, a wounded eight-year-old Iraqi girl, sits in a hospital bed after her house was destroyed in an overnight air strike, which killed her both parents, in Najaf, May 12, 2004. U.S. troops killed at least 20 militiamen loyal to rebel Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in fierce fighting in the Iraqi city of Kerbala, a senior U.S. military officer said. REUTERS/Faleh Kheiber

&e=4

Feel free to rate the picture. Everybody should see what we're doing in Najf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. good point, but I thought we were discussing the PRISON ABUSE ISSUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
38. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v2.0
==================

The time now is 11:44:52AM EDT, Thursday, May 13, 2004.

There are exactly...
3 days,
12 hours,
15 minutes, and
8 seconds left in our fund drive.

This website could not survive without your generosity. Member donations
pay for more than 84% of the Democratic Underground budget. Don't let
GrovelBot become the next victim of the Bush economy. Bzzzt.

Please take a moment to donate to DU right now. Thank you for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
41. Those soldiers would probably agree with Kennedy
Haven't you been listening to the soldiers who are brave enough to speak out? THEY HAVE NO LEADERSHIP!

Kennedy isn't political slumming - that's the Bushco* forte.

I for one WANT Kennedy and our other elected leaders to shout at the top of their lungs. I, as an American am screaming! There are no exaggerated comments as you suggest, this whole scenario is painfully real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. Equating Saddam's mass murders and the humiliation
of SOME prisoners by a few of our soldiers is wrong and offensive. "Over the top" for sure Dave, and very disrespectful of the 99.9% of our troops that are serving with honor. I know this is a Bush admin line, but it's one I unequivocally agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
55. What the hell is going on at DU?
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:52 AM by Q
- First of all...the title to this thread is very offensive...telling one of the brightest Democratic Senators to shut his 'pie hole' is insulting to all Democrats and democracy itself.

- Some of you are distorting his words and making it sound like something he didn't say. Stick with the facts. The same prison that was used for the purpose of torture is still open and under the control of American forces.

- I don't blame this on all the troops. I blame it on those who performed these vile acts and their friggin 'COMMANDER IN CHIEF'...the chickenshit that loves to order people into (illegal) wars but was too cowardly to fight in one himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #55
63. They're getting nervous.
And thinking we won't recognize the talking points.

Some achieve a tombstone immediately; for others, it takes a while.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #63
80. I guess you have no family in the military, Mrs Burke.
I'm against the war, but support the troops. I abhor comments such as TK's - It's politiking at it's worst...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #80
86. Why? The truth is the truth, no matter how unpalatable.
Shouldn't we condemn and in doing so, defend the honor of decent, ordinary soldiers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #86
97. How about "I condem the the mismanagement
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:28 AM by Spoon
of the Bush Admin and the actions of a few of our troops", not the ugly blanket statement? What Hussein did and what has occurred at the prison in the past year do not equate, period. It's statements like his which will cause shit being thrown at soldiers returning home from Iraq. Do any of you care???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #97
102. They do equate, I'm afraid. I see no difference.
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:22 AM by Screaming Lord Byron
I don't see how we can be held responsible for what others may do to the troops. I won't be flinging any shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #80
96. ANY criticism of ChimpCo Inc. is labeled "playing politics"...
by the right wing nut jobs.

It is pretty stupid to "support" the troops, regardless of what atrocities they might commit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #80
125. My cousin is in the Navy.
Edited on Thu May-13-04 12:51 PM by Bridget Burke
His father served in the Navy after WWII & had a career in the FBI. His other son is now in the FBI.

Two other uncles served in the 8th Air Force during WWII & stayed in until retirement--one commissioned, one not. My father was also in the Mighty 8th. He was called back to active duty when I was 6 weeks old & died in a plane crash more than 50 years ago.

I support the troops. Those who did wrong must be court martialed. But the chicken-hawk fuckers who got them in this situation must pay the price, too. If a loss in November is the worst they have to face, they're far too lucky. If politicking is what it takes, then I say we politick. And Ted is an old pro.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #63
92. Yup
don't buy it. It's like playing whack-a-mole. they think we're as stupid as their fellow freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
75. The Quote
"Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers have re-opened under new management -- United States management."

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&edition=us&ie=ISO-8859-1&scoring=d&q=Kennedy+Abu+management.&btnG=Search+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #75
78. I approve that comment wholeheartedly. Anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdbrain Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #75
137. It IS shameful.
Where's the lie in that sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
56. Not as offensive as the thousands that we bombed into oblivion
Drop bad habits -- not bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
130. What mass murders are those?
You mean the Iran-Iraq War, Desert Storm, or the Kurdish uprising? Or are you just buying any horseshit that comes out of the Bush administration these days? We know they lied despicably about WMD - any reason to think the "mass murder" stories are any more true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
51. Ted is destroying rightwing talking point #1
which states that JK is even MORE LIBERAL than Kennedy!

By allowing JK to take a stand TO THE RIGHT OF KENNEDY, THAT TALKING POINT IS MADE MOOT.

Thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. interesting point, but made valid only
if Kerry publicly distances himself from those comments. I doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #52
65. Dave -- you confuse me
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:58 AM by CatWoman
are you this critical of Zell Miller or Joe Lieberman when they publically suck Bush's dick?

Do you think they should shut their "pie holes" when they do that?

And they do it a lot. They seem to actually enjoy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. actually, Lieberman COMPLETELY lost my respect
with his comments at the Rumsfeld hearing last week...when he wondered where the apologies were from the "terrorist".
Miller, well, he's a lost cause so i don't concern myself with him. I expect better from Kennedy, however, and maybe that is why is chose to pick on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #65
88. Holy Christ Catwoman!
"publically suck Bush's dick?"

I just spewed salad all over my monitor and keyboard! You gotta warn someone when you're gonna say that! :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #88
108. bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #52
67. this whole invasion was immoral and wrong

and now u.s. forces are torturing people

how can you defend that?

This whole affair has destroyed U.S. credibility on a global level and has put a very ugly face on U.S. foreign policy.
Not only that, but in terms of the realpolitik definintion of credibility, (i.e. "defy us and we will crush you"), the U.S. has blown it. Now we have our military being sucked down a black hole and other actors on the global level do not feel so afraid anymore.

As well, I don't give a flying fuck what some right-wing crybaby thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
53. Ted can speak for me any old day. He's
been an outspoken thorn in the side of Repukes for decades. Rave on Ted. Better Kennedy than Joe "wrong party" Lieberman and Zell "knee pads" Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
57. HELL NO!.....scream it from the fucking rooftops! I'm sick of the repuke
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:54 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
talking points be disseminated here....and letting Sean Insanity and O'Really and Rush Cycistass dictating what our democratic reps should and should not be saying

fuck me twice i am so angry!!!


........okay OKAY ....i will now take slow deep breathes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lou_C Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
61. The right wingers hate Kennedy and he has a big mouth
I hope that he uses it and we all need to speak up.

Why should we shut up now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #61
69. That's exactly what the RWingers are attempting to do...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:05 AM by Q
...shut us up with threats and accusations of 'helping the enemy'. Once again I say bullshit...the Bush* cabal has finally been exposed for the immoral bastards they are and we're not going to let them escape accountability THIS time.

- NO MORE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
71. Limbaugh DEMANDED an apology yesterday....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
76. Thank God there are a few Democrats left who don't listen to such advice
Otherwise we'd be left with NOTHING but a party of daschleweenies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:11 AM
Original message
Ironically, the Senator who has impressed my the most during
this whole thing is McCain. I guess to some on this board that is tantamount to treason. The SC Senator(JAG Officer dude) has handled it well also, but i still am leary of his true motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
94. Not surprising
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:17 AM by ibegurpard
eom

on edit: the senator from SC? Are you talking about Lindsay Graham? One of the prominent Clinton cock-hunters? That senator? Your choice of senators to admire is quite telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #94
104. as i said...I still question his motives
You can argue, however, that Graham has been as forthcoming about examining the abuse as most anyone. Last i saw, he wanted ALL pics made available to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
100. McCain was one of the main driving forces behind...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 11:20 AM by Q
...the illegal attack on Iraq. He suggested that it would be a cakewalk. He's a RWing apologist who has twinges of conscience now and then and says something appealing. But he's still a traitor to our Country and Constitution for his support of wars of aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
84. I'm glad he's speaking in strong terms
about this. However, I'd like to see a direct quote. Anybody have one, or a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
89. I support Senator Kennedys outrage! Scream on Ted!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
93. Kennedy quote from Crossfire transcript:
"Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management."

BTW, Senator Kennedy doesn't have a "piehole."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #93
103. Totally appropriate statement, imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IHaveADream Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #93
105. Kennedy rules.
He is the conscience of America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
106. Kennedy is correct on this one

Bush has totally blown any pretense to the moral high-ground.

They all whined and cried about Saddam's evil torture, not that
they actually gave a shit (the historical record proves otherwise).
And now, they are over there doing the exact same shit they
where whining about.

It is always the case that Bushco does exactly what they accuse others of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
110. I'll bet the DLC doesn't like it when Kennedy speaks out either.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0512-14.htm

Surely Kennedy never had to struggle with the question. And you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
111. LMFAO. That's just what Karl Rove thinks.
Kennedy's done more to advance the Constitution of the United States than anybody involved in making those stacks of naked men or posing for the photos. Same goes for the turds of the BFEE who ordered them to do so.

As for mentioning Tom DeLay: FUCK HIM, TOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #111
117. Lol - yep. Did this topic come from rushlimbaugh.com?
Because if you googlenews "kennedy torture chamber" it is the first item in the googlenews list - from rushlimbaugh.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #117
121. VRWC is very up on using "catchy phrases."
That helps the turds of the BFEE cover up all the truth, let alone people, they kill. Must be part of the giant brainwashing thing.



SENATOR ISELIN
There's just one thing, babe. I'd
be a lot happier if we could just
settle on the number of Communists I
know there are in the Defense
Department.

Mrs. Iselin gives him a withering look as he sits down to his lunch of steak and baked potato.

SENATOR ISELIN
I-I mean, the way you keep changing
the figures on me all the time,
it-it makes look like-like some kind
of a nut, like-like-like an idiot.
The boys are even startin' to kid me
about it. Why, just yesterday in
the cloak room, they said: "Hey,
Johnny!"--



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
112. In the words of the Honorable Senator from Iowa, Tom Harkin,
Bullshit. For the longest time we've had many getting after Dems for not holding chimpy accountable and not standing up to the repugs.
I say not only does Teddy NOT have to shut up, his voice needs to lead to a chorus of Democrats standing up to and going toe to toe with the repugs on everything. The time for playing nice has long since past. We need to take our country back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
114. If more Democrats were like Kennedy I would be a DEM
I don't agree with him all the time but more often than not he speaks the hard to hear truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_real_38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
115. I think Kennedy's people in Massachussetts really like him...
.... he reminds me of the Yankee version of Strom Thurmond, without the hypocritical white supremacy thing.

He's just a guy who says what's on his mind, and people like that. And I wonder if a lot of this 'over-the-top' stuff he has said, like Iraq being "a fraud cooked up in Texas" and "George Bush's Vietnam" aren't going to turn out to be true.

The guy's got rocks, and he's on the right side (the left one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
118. He saw 1600 pictures that you didn't. You are assuming facts not in
evidence..BTW...did you happen to catch McCain on Letterman last night? He was a prisoner of war and said nothing like this had ever happened to him....does he need to cap his pie hole too?

Our soldiers are over there WAY too long...some are doing admirable jobs..others are just turning into the animal their full potential will allow them to be.

I think the only pie hole with unfounded accusations of grandstanding happens to be the one that started this thread.

There are reports of soldiers posing with a dead body where the face was undistinguishable....

Can you say without a shadow of a doubt that MORE people would have died over the last 14 months in Iraq than if Saddam had remained in power? I can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
119. So his speaking the TRUTH bothers you because..................?
:shrug: I see it this way, we've been in Iraq for just over 1 year. In that time, we've killed at least 10,000 innocent civilians who's only 'crime' was that they were born into a country that lived under a repressive regime. How many innocent civilians did Saddam kill in any given year?

While we've been in charge there, we've rounded up thousands of men, woman, and yes, even children and held them without charge because they might harbor a different political ideology than our own. Saddam used to do the same. Published reports claim that at Abu Ghaib prison alone we've held up to 20,000 people, and according to the Red Cross, some 70% to 90% of them were erroneously taken into custody. How many people a year did Saddam arrest without charge and hold in prison?

While holding those people in prison without charge, at the very least, 25 have died in our custody. How many people a year died in those prisons while under Saddam's care?

It's been proved that while being held in prison without charge, some of the innocent people in our care were subjected to rape, both physical and psychological torture, and even death, by the more radical elements of our armed forces simply because they were perceived to be 'the enemy'. The same used to happen under Saddam.

So tell me, to those innocents who we rounded up, held without charge, beat, raped, tortured and even killed, do you think that they see any difference on the ground there between our forces and Saddam's other than that under Saddam, they had intact homes, jobs, businesses, functioning water and electrical systems and no terrorists operating in their country?

Try putting yourself in their (the victims) sandals for a moment and ask yourself, do they see any difference between our forces and Saddam's? Do they feel like they're better off now than they were 2 years ago? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
122. Me thinks not.
I don't understand why Republicans hate America so much. Maybe you can explain why:

a) Republicans are not demanding impeachment of a pResident who did nothing to stop 9/11 and the killing of 3000 Americans.
b) Republicans allow Bush to blame 9/11 on Iraqi's, knowing the facts say Saudi Arabia.
c) Republicans support Bush's lies to Congress, the UN, and the American people on WMD to justify this invasion.
d) Republicans support torture of Iraqis at the hands of Americans, further destroying our international reputation.

Why do Republicans support a compromised, morally deficient pResident over the interests of our country? Why do Republicans hate America so much?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
123. Go Teddy Go !!!!
Been a Kennedy supporter since a teenager in Massachusetts. Have a picture I took of Ted and his then wife Joan in our town's 4th of July parade. Ted has always been like the kid in the family that continues to get into all sorts of trouble, but in the end is the one with the heart of gold. He has always stuck his neck out for what was right, whether it was civil rights, the unions and working people, health care and education. This is a man who dearly and deeply CARES about America. He wears his heart on his sleeve. Ted can say anything he wants. It's too bad we don't have more like him in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
124. Kennedy's comments are dead on, however -
...I don't trust his reasons or motivations for saying them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
126. Teddy Rocks
I hope he remains a huge thorn in the side of Republicans for many more years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
131. I think someone else needs to cap his pie-hole.....
And it ain't me and Kennedy.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #131
133. I think you're right!
Of course, it would be impolite to name names....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #131
135. Bingo! Well said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
132. So bush's rape rooms are better?And no the soliders are not doing an
admirable job there.They are rapists , one of the lowest scum of human beings,over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
138. Kennedy was right. This needed to be said.
I think it is disgusting that centrists and right-wingers want to silence our more brilliant Democrats. Kennedy was right. The truth needs to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC