Oh For Christ's Sake... When Will They Quit Saying "Alleged" Abuse??

[arwalden]

Enough is enough! The abuse happened, the crime WAS COMMITTED... it's the individuals who are "alleged" to have committed the crimes.

Mr. Berg wasn't allegedly beheaded... why? Because we know it happened. We also know the prison abuse happened.

No... I'm not comparing the severity of the two crimes. I'm comparing the idiocy of how the cable news outlets love to use the word "alleged"... as though they are somehow making themselves appear to be more-credible as careful-thoughtful journalists.

What BULLSHIT!!!

-- Allen <--- broke his pledge to never watch cable news again when this shit started happening... and now he's regretting his lapse of judgment.

P.S. In my own defense... I did manage to go for over ONE FULL YEAR cable news free. That's worth something, isn't it?

EDIT: clarity/emphasis

[MissRegina]

1. I agree.

The pictures speak a thousand words.

Love your sig line by the way. I've thought about going cold turkey myself...especially after seeing all these pics and now the gruesome video.

:scared:

[ComerPerro]

2. Amen

And, you are correct. The individuals are "alleged" to have committed abuse.

But the abuse happened.

[indigobusiness]

3. They should address Bush's 'Alleged" sanity...

return to sender...address unknown.

http://sludgereport.blogspot.com/

[freeforall]

4. I agree

I'm sick of them calling it "alleged" abuse.

[maddezmom]

5. what they should be saying is Mr Berg was allegedly beheaded

beheaded by an Islamic Group tied to Al Qaeda. Yes, he was beheaded...saw the tape. But, who can say without a doubt the men in the photos were AQ or Islamist? I'm not an expert, but I have my doubts.

[carolinayellowdog]

6. When they stop saying "almost" irreparable damage...

to the reputation of the US. It's totally irreparable for God's sake and we all know it. That "almost" is stupid wishful thinking.

[shraby]

7. I say

Bush was allegedly elected. :crazy:

[Mike Niendorff]

8. I agree.

Someone needs to point out to these hacks that mispresenting documented, verifiable facts as some sort of he-said-she-said "allegations" is not
journalism. It is pure partisan apologetics.


MDN