Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When they use the excuse "It was just a FEW soldiers"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:25 PM
Original message
When they use the excuse "It was just a FEW soldiers"
Edited on Sun May-09-04 05:26 PM by Lex

. . . and that it shouldn't reflect on the rest of the U.S. soldiers or the U.S. in general, then just say:

It was only a few people who caused 911, but now it's apparently okay not only to hate those people but all of their fellow citizens, both in Afghanistan, AND in Iraq (which had nothing to do with 911).

So how can the White House say the Iraq torturers were "only a few soldiers" and therefore, it doesn't reflect on our whole country?

The White House certainly doesn't feel that way about the few who committed terrorist acts against the U.S.--hell, they're invading countries based on the actions of a few!

PS--I tried this argument on a right-wing family member today and it shut her up. Hee hee.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good Job ^^
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good thinking! thanks for the arguing point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. great argument!
Plus, the countries they are invading have nothing to do with the 9/11 terrorists.

it would be like attacking China because of Pearl Harbor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here are some other inconsistencies I've heard recently:
Bush says the latest heinous actions are "from just a few bad apples". Only a few did the torturing. He himself could never be implicated in that mess. But when Bush described Iraqi tortures, he accused Saddam of doing the torturing.

Also, regarding these "few bad ones", he said they must be considered "innocent until proven guilty". We can't jump to any conclusions about their guilt. So what about the prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison? I've read that many of them are ordinary citizens scooped up in Baghdad. They've even hauled in kids (one 12-year old in question which will be part of the new "bombshell" soon).

So he's a F*ing hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. the problem is it was "just a few soldiers"
who were following the orders of the intelligence arm of the military and the CIA and mercenary interrogators,

soldiers who had not be trained to know better with a solid grounding in Geneva Conventions,

a few soldiers who had no business taking orders from a disgraced Utah prisons administrator.

These few soldiers were pawns of the men all the way at the top!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyLove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Except that the 19 hijackers were only a small part of a.........
much larger whole, and their feelings reflected those of many many more people....they were acting on behalf of more than just themselves.

The U.S. soldiers who did wrong in Iraq went too far and did things that fall outside of what they are supposed to be doing.

Therefore, it is O.K. to 'hate' more than just the bad actors in the case of the hijackers, but not so much the entire U.S. and it's military because of the actions of a few.

Of course this post is only in reference to the acts committed in the prison, not the overall invasion, as obviously hatred of America will be born from the 'war' itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Do not come to that conclusion so hastily. Read:
The U.S. soldiers who did wrong in Iraq went too far and did things that fall outside of what they are supposed to be doing.

Read General Taguba's leaked report investigating this. It's not at all clear that what the soldiers did was outside of what they were "supposed" to be doing. The story on this is just beginning to come out.

In addition, Seymour Hersh's 2 articles in The New Yorker summarize this pretty well. It has every appearance that the soldiers may have been doing what they were "supposed" to be doing.

Taguba report:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4894001

Hersh Articles:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact

http://newyorker.com/fact/content/?040517fa_fact2

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyLove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I have no doubt that they were instructed to 'soften up'.........
the prisoners, but I still think that these individual soldiers went above and beyond even those instructions.

At this point, none of us know for sure...there is just way too much speculation about it at this point, with everyone here just assuming that this behavior was sanctioned at the highest levels.

How much outrage did these same folks feel when the Waco massacre happened? Did every Democrat and their Mother demand Janet Reno resign? Did everyone blame Clinton for creating an 'atmosphere' in which this was thought to be the norm as Bush is accused of in this case? I think that what happened to Koresh and friends beats this episode by about a million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. You do need to add in...
...the 36% of the American public (the Limpbaugh fans) who do indeed support the torture of Iraqis (or other non-white inferiors).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonAmerican Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. It seems to have been pretty systematic
and widespread. And not just US soldiers but also those from the UK...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, of course, *we* know that, but the SPIN is
that it is isolated and my answer to the spin is what I was referring to.

Of course, the truth is that I believe that it was systemic, widespread, and so "okay" with the higher-ups that taking pictures seemed not risky or ill-advised to them.

My post was about shutting them up in their spin about the torture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonAmerican Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I think it's not just *you*
but pretty much everyone that knows that by now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I tell them that they were under orders. This bullcrap was policy. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MORTEN Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. KIA
Does anybody now what the civilian casualty count is currently under
afghan and iraqi people?

Since I am wondering howmany foreigner lifes equal 1 american life.

Not to mention: how many american and british and dutch and japanese and italian and any other coalition members lives equals freedom.

Or is that a stupid question and considerd as classified info as well....


As I gird on for fighting
My sword upon my thigh,
I think on old ill fortunes
Of better men than I.

Think I, the round world over,
What golden lads are low
With hurts not mine to mourn for
And shames I shall not know.

What evil luck soever
For me remains in store,
'Tis sure much finer fellows
Have fared much worse before.

So here are things to think on
That ought to make me brave,
As I strap on for fighting
My sword that will not save.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beanball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Detainees
we should all be upset and angry at the actions of the soldiers that mistreated those men,but for the life of me I can't understand why we accept the killing of innocent women and children and not a word,my fellow americans that is sick,and this country need to look inward and see that we are in big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. In today's paper I saw another excuse
The rabid right is now saying...

Saddam didn't apologize and Bush did.

Guess that makes it all better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
outinforce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. "They"???
When "they" use the excuse.....?????

Who is this "they", exactly, that you are speaking of?

Would it be people who are not reflexively anti-military?

Would someone like John Kerry, who served honorably in the US Armed Forces, -- would he be one of "them"?

Who do you mean when you say "they"??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederic Bastiat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
18. I take it you're not voting for Kerry right?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. I saw one of the torturer's friends defend him this way
Edited on Mon May-10-04 07:31 AM by Atman
(Before I start...how come EVERY person interviewed for this story has a thick southern drawl and comes from a mining town of 75 people? Is that what the world thinks we're all like?)

This buffoon was saying "Them guys dragged our boys through the street and hung 'em from a bridge! And people are complainin' thet we're roughin 'em up a little! Jeremy was a good boy, wouldn't hurt no one!"

Of course he wouldn't. That's why he joined the service. The pictures...they was told...er, were told to pose that way, they'd never actually do that stuff.

Care for some moonshine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. The "bad apple" theory...
...usualy comes up after some police atrocity -- stateside too, you might point out. Just here in NYC:

a cop strangles a guy in a choke-hold, having started a confrontation because a poorly-aimed football hit his squad car: bad apple

a couple of cops drag a guy into a closet, break the handle off a plunger and proceed to ram it first up his butt then down his throat: bad apples

It goes on, with the same excuses.

So you have to point out: then whatever mechanism is supposed to get rid of the "bad apples" is f***ing BROKEN! But fixing that goes up the chain of command, and starts affecting men in cushy positions of authority who have plenty of political friends, so it never happens.

Then there's conditions that work to CREATE "bad apples", and a prison is a place ripe to do that, especially if their instructions are to "set the proper conditions" for later interrogation (something that when done semi-officially tends to be short on carrots and ling on sticks).

You have to ask yourself: how likely is it that ALL of the "bad apples" in Iraq HAPPENED to be assigned to the same unit, given prison duty, and just happened to think they could get away with this sh*t? Or is there more of it we haven't seen yet because nobody had pictures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. ... the whole dam orchard is rotten and should be uprooted.
Edited on Mon May-10-04 08:05 AM by Iceburg
Yet "one mad cow" will lead to the slaughter of entire herds" for the safety of it citizens.

And "one mad president" continues to lead the slaughter of entire nations ...

http://www.albasrah.net/images/war_crimes/index.htm

America is the ultimate paradox of freedom and humanity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Do These People Realize What They're Really Saying?
First...a GREAT argument point and one I hope gets passed around for others to use. It's dead on and can't be refuted. I love those. Thanks!!!!

A tactic I enjoy when confronting wingnuts is, when they say something outlandish, to have them say it again. In some cases, my hearing gets so bad I want them to repeat what they said a third time and a little slower...or maybe again and even slower. Notice, the more they hear what they're saying, the more they hesitate on saying it.

I'm seeing so many attempts this weekend for the flying monkeys to justify torture...or pass the buck. I am also seeing how badly this is really backfiring on the "middle" of America that will determine the election and public opinion. Keep fidling, Nero!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. Red Cross ONE YEAR AGO called it "systematic abuse"
These were NOT isolated. In fact, according to a quote in the paper today, General Miller was brought to Abu Ghraib to "GITMO-IZE" the place and make it a house of interogation. Which makes the thought of what is actually going on in Cuba even more disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC