FAIR ALERT , hard to find women's march on the TV news

[G_j]

Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism

http://www.fair.org/activism/womens-march-networks.html

ACTION ALERT:
Hard to Find Women's March on Television News

May 3, 2004

On Sunday, April 25, hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets of
Washington, D.C. to demonstrate for women's reproductive rights. Crowd
estimates ranged from 500,000 to 1.15 million, but it was clear that the
March for Women's Lives was one of the largest demonstrations in the
capital's history-- and perhaps the largest ever. One might have
expected, then, to see extensive coverage on national television-- but a
look at both network and cable news during the days surrounding the march
turned up remarkably few reports.

A Nexis search of the week surrounding the women's march found a total of
six stories from the broadcast networks (not counting incidental mentions
of the march): CBS ran one story the day of the march and two the next
morning; NBC ran two stories and ABC only one, all on April 25. CNN, as a
24-hour cable news outlet, gave more extensive coverage to the event,
running several reports on Sunday. But even CNN failed to treat the march
as the historic occasion that it was, running just a small handful of
brief march-related stories on Saturday and Monday.

Other cable news outlets focused not on the march itself but on abortion
opponents, a few hundred of whom held a counter-protest at the march. Of
three Fox News stories found on Nexis related to the march, two focused on
anti-abortion activists (Special Report with Brit Hume, Hannity & Colmes,
4/22/04). Special Report examined anti-abortion opposition to the
National Education Association's endorsement of the march-- a story that
MSNBC also covered in that network's only march report found in the Nexis
database. (Fox and MSNBC do not transcribe their news coverage as
thoroughly as CNN does, so the amount of coverage on the three cable
channels cannot be compared.)

To put the women's march coverage in perspective, FAIR conducted a similar
Nexis search of the week surrounding the Promise Keepers march in 1997.
The Promise Keepers, an evangelical men's organization that has been
widely accused of promoting misogyny and homophobia, drew an estimated
480,000-750,000 demonstrators to Washington-- roughly three-quarters the
size of the women's march. Despite its somewhat smaller size, the Promise
Keepers received much more media attention: Stories began appearing on
network news three days before the march and continued for two days
afterward, with a total of 19 stories between the three networks-- more
than three times the coverage the networks devoted to the women's march.
Was the Promise Keepers march three times more newsworthy than the March
for Women's Lives?

Why such little coverage? Women's issues routinely get short shrift in
the media, and during this election year, news outlets found even more
reason to discount women's voices. NBC Nightly News reporter Jeannie Ohm
asked (4/25/04), "But just how big a factor will abortion rights have in
the November election?... Political analysts say it's the economy and
jobs, war in Iraq, homeland security and health care that will have more
of an impact with undecided voters." CNN correspondent Elaine Quijano
sounded a similar note (4/25/04): "This election year, each group hopes to
spark renewed interest, enough to have an impact at the ballot box. But
political analysts say more than three decades after Roe v. Wade, most
voters have already made up their minds."

A record-breaking number of people-- mostly women-- marched on Washington
to demonstrate their commitment to women's rights and their
dissatisfaction with Bush's record on women's issues. By minimizing
coverage of the event and reducing women's rights to a low-ranking concern
in the presidential horse race, television news stifled critical public
dialogue on women's rights and health, and relegated women and their
concerns to the sidelines.

ACTION: Please let the networks know that you were disappointed by the
scant coverage given to the historic March for Women's Lives.

CONTACT:
ABC World News Tonight
Phone: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]

CBS Evening News
Phone: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]

NBC Nightly News
Phone: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]

----------
Your donation to FAIR makes a difference:
http://www.fair.org/donate.html

SUBSCRIBE TO EXTRA! AND GET FAIR'S NEW BOOK FOR FREE:
The Oh Really? Factor
http://www.fair.org/ohreally.html

FAIR SHIRTS: Get your "Don't Trust the Corporate Media" shirt today at FAIR's online store:
http://www.merchantamerica.com/fair/

FAIR produces CounterSpin, a weekly radio show heard on over 130 stations in the U.S. and Canada. To find the CounterSpin station nearest you, visit http://www.fair.org/counterspin/stations.html

Feel free to respond to FAIR ( [e-mail] ). We can't reply to everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate documented examples of media bias or censorship. And please send copies of your email correspondence with media outlets, including any responses, to [e-mail] .

You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site: http://www.fair.org . Our subscriber list is kept confidential.
FAIR
[phone]
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: [e-mail]

[NMDemDist2]

1. we screamed about that the whole week of the march n/t

[G_j]

3. not the first time

I seem to remember the entire world also making history when millions of people demonstrated for peace.
Making history doesn't seem to be news worthy. :shrugs:

[murielm99]

2. Let me tell you about my little experience with March coverage.

Before I went to the March, I contacted the editor of my regional paper. (Northern Illinois).

I told him I was going to the March, and that I would be very disappointed if my area newspaper did not give it adequate coverage.

He wrote back to me, and asked me to do a guest column on the march. I said okay. AS SOON AS I got back, Monday afternoon, I e-mailed him a column. BTW, this is not the first time I have done guest columns or LTTEs for this paper.

When he got the column, he asked me if he could use it, and if I would come in for a picture to accompany the column. I said yes. THEN, within hours, I got another e-mail from him, saying that since I was so far away, about 25 miles, he would use it as a letter, to keep it fresh. I called him and left a message. I told him he already had a picture of me, from a column I did in February. I did not want to see it edited down to nothing, as it would be in a letter, and that I have a flexible schedule. I would be glad to come in for a picture, if he could not find my old one.

If I am able to get from Northern Illinois to Washington, I can certainly drive 25 miles to his newspaper.

I heard nothing. I e-mailed him again and asked him when it would appear. I heard nothing for another day, so I e-mailed him and told him since it took so long to follow throughm, I would like to cancel my subscription.

I did not tell him this, but I was prepared contact the parent company of his newspaper, NARAL, and Planned Parenthood. I was also going to discuss my experiences with our local Democratic Central Committee, where I am an officer. Essentially, if I had not heard from him, I was prepared to raise hell.

I did finally get an e-mail from him, about an hour ago. He said it would appear as a letter, being too short for a column. (Bullshit -- it was 850 words, the length of another column I did for them).

He said he was transitioning to a new job, and very busy. It is true that he is a new editor. He said also that he did not respond well to threats, referring to my threat to cancel. I felt a little bad, but if this is the only way to get coverage of the march, I am prepared to be the biggest bitch in the world.

[G_j]

4. if you were willing to make the drive

what was the problem? Sounds like a convenient excuse.
It will be interesting to see what parts they edit out for the letter.

[murielm99]

5. I will post the letter here.

I will also let you guys know what they leave out.

I wrote it as my personal experience of the March -- as asked by this editor.

I am sure that my LTTE will generate lots of comments. My letters always do. I even get some mail at home after I write something.

All death threats are referred to the sheriff.