Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the People of Fallujah Have Gone After the Contractors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:50 AM
Original message
Should the People of Fallujah Have Gone After the Contractors?
Edited on Sun May-02-04 02:59 AM by JCMach1
I don't think it has ever been clearly answered what the contractors were doing there.

Was it justified retaliation for torture or humiliation?

Could this be an additional reason for the Fallujah pullout?

Is there more to come out about this?

Has your opinion changed due to recent revealations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. the contractors might've provoked violence by shooting at Iraqis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fallujah
I don't know if those private security guards were engaged in hostile acts or not when they were killed, so I'll leave that question unanswered. Would the citizens have a right to defend themselves if they were attacked? Of course. But I don't really know much about the circumstamces of this episode.

Burning their bodies to a crisp and then publicly hanging them, however, is a clear violation of the rules of warfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Was it in response to another violation though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Should"?
I'm sorry. Are we playing by Marquis of Queensbury's Rules here?

A sovereign nation invaded by a foreign power has the right to free itself.

This is not a boyscout jamboree.

You want rules? Here's a good one: The people who start a war don't get a say in how it ends.

ANYTHING they do to us is earned. ANYTHING. We INVADED. The fate of invaders is ours. We've been having trouble grasping this. ANYTHING they do is justified. They are burying their families in mass graves in their SOCCER field. ANYTHING they do to us is justified.

Now we can respond with equal brutality, yes we can. But then we would finally have to face what we are and what we've done.

"Should." Please. The only relevant "should" is WE SHOULD NOT HAVE INVADED IRAQ.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It was retaliation
A bunch of civilians had been shot shortly before. I believe it was in connection with a wedding celebration. The official story was that someone fired a gun and some US soldiers thought someone was firing on them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm sure there was something we didn;t hear about
that triggered it, but there are no justifications to the attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does anyone recall a "Private Contractors" clause in the IWR??
I'm baffled... I don't recall the president being forthright and honest about the secret, corporate, no-chain-of-command military...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clyrc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. quite a question, JC
I think I would have phrased it differently. No one should ever do those things to another human being. But it is highly possible that it was provoked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. How many of them really stop to think about the difference
between the soldiers and the contractors?

Not that they are stupid, but they are all hated Americans to the insurgents. They might want to kill the closest convenient American. It demoralizes and angers the enemy either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Note, a good % of the contractors are foreign nationals
Also, the role of such people is ambiguous under the Geneva convention...

Thus, they offer deniability to the powers that be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kremer Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. From what I heard, the contractors were not to be in Fallujah at all! They
were warned to stay away b/c Fallujah has been a hot spot ever since our boys shot and killed 17 civilians during a protest in Fallujah last April. These contractors were in big Chevy/GMC? suv's w/ armed security guards inside w/them. They were in a convoy going back to Baghdad. One suv in front, then two 18-wheelers and another suv behind them. For some unknown reason, they decided to cut through Fallujah (shortcut)? Anyway, Fallujah only has one main road in/out of the city. They came down that road and were ambushed. The first suv was shot-up and had no chance. While they fired on the first suv, one or both of the big rigs were able to drive off and escape. They then proceeded to shoot and kill the people in the 2nd suv. Sounds like it was wrong place/wrong time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Should the People of Fallujah Have Gone After the Contractors"
No the contractors were there because of a pack of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. The "people of Fallujah" didn't go after the contractors.
The insurgents did. The "people of Fallujah" were merely the recipients of the wholesale slaughter doled as collective punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. if you're a foriegner in iraq and you don't wanna get shot at
then get the fuck out of there.

no sympathy for the capetbaggers, of any stripe, in that country to make money off of the occupation the iraqis suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC