Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Must Read: Undecided voters go BIG to the challenger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 03:10 PM
Original message
Must Read: Undecided voters go BIG to the challenger
Good news for Kerry

http://www.socastee.com/all_politics/incumbent_races.htm

(Nick Panagakis, a member of the National Council on Public Polls, is president of Market Shares Corporation, a marketing and public opinion research firm headquartered in Mt. Prospect, Ill. This article appeared in the February 27, 1989 edition of The Polling Report.)

How will undecideds vote on election day? Traditionally, there have been two schools of thought about how undecideds in trial heat match-ups will divide up at the ballot box. One is that they will break equally; the other, that they will split in proportion to poll respondents who stated a candidate preference.

But our analysis of 155 polls reveals that, in races that include an incumbent, the traditional answers are wrong. Over 80% of the time, most or all of the undecideds voted for the challenger.

The 155 polls we collected and analyzed were the final polls conducted in each particular race; most were completed within two weeks of election day. They cover both general and primary elections, and Democratic and Republican incumbents. They are predominantly from statewide races, with a few U.S. House, mayoral and countywide contests thrown in. Most are from the 1986 and 1988 elections, although a few stretch back to the 1970s.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. After today, I am ON MY KNEES, praying that this is correct.
Just watched Dana Milbank on MSNBC (avoiding CNN these days - their bias is just too upsetting) sitting there, all mild-mannered, about the pResident and vice pResident's appearance at the 9/11 "hearings." And he was just fine and dandy and talking in a most genteel manner about how he was hoping some 9/11 commissioner would leak a few things.

JEEZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE???????????????????????

I called CNN and complained - ANYWAY. The guy said I was being mean. You know what? FUCK THEM ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gonna call MSNBC next.

I'm so mad I'm spitting! And they're OKAY WITH THIS???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC