Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

joint appearance before 9/11 commission has GOT to kill *'s credibility

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
angryinoville Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:23 PM
Original message
joint appearance before 9/11 commission has GOT to kill *'s credibility
Never mind the fact that it's not under oath, or recorded, or made public. Just another shining example of why NO ONE should trust these guys. How can the RW spin this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. they just do not address the issue
they say Bush & Cheney are "looking forward to answering questions". Dear GOD can you imagine if Clinton had refused to answer questions WITHOUT GORE ?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. The explanation is about body language...
Chimp says it was important for the commission to see their body language. What the heck?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Strange, indeed.
He's saying the body language of the two of them together tells the commission how they work together.

Pure rubbish, but so strange!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He has a thing about body language. I think it is mentioned repeatedly
during Woodwards book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Body language is apparently big in Woodward's book
I haven't read it yet, only a couple excerpts from a review, but apparently the the entire administration is so in sync that they can communicate by pounding their chests and grunting. Think about it you've got to have good body language if you're going to communicate through all the lies you tell . . . talk about GOP code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Of course that's it.
The mouth says one thing, but the body says something else.

That's like the defense for a date-raper.

BushCo: Date-raping America because you know you want it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is only one reason you will refuse to testify under oath.
There is only one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edgar Bergen and Charlie McCarthy storm the Oval Offive.
Maybe someone can "fix" these faces.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Don't demean Charlie McCarthy's memory like that!
He was much suaver than Bush. Perhaps Mortimer Snerd is a more apt comparison.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sorry.
You are so right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. How 'bout this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. "I'm interested in the Commission's recommendation..."
"...and the Commission is interested in their recommendation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC