Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Again: Al Qaeda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 02:40 AM
Original message
Think Again: Al Qaeda
The mere mention of al Qaeda conjures images of an efficient terrorist network guided by a powerful criminal mastermind. Yet al Qaeda is more lethal as an ideology than as an organization. “Al Qaedaism” will continue to attract supporters in the years to come—whether Osama bin Laden is around to lead them or not.

by Jason Burke
Foreign Policy
May/June, 2004

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2536

“Al Qaeda Is a Global Terrorist Organization”

No. It is less an organization than an ideology. The Arabic word qaeda can be translated as a “base of operation” or “foundation,” or alternatively as a “precept” or “method.” Islamic militants always understood the term in the latter sense. In 1987, Abdullah Azzam, the leading ideologue for modern Sunni Muslim radical activists, called for al-qaeda al-sulbah (a vanguard of the strong). He envisaged men who, acting independently, would set an example for the rest of the Islamic world and thus galvanize the umma (global community of believers) against its oppressors. It was the FBI—during its investigation of the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in East Africa—which dubbed the loosely linked group of activists that Osama bin Laden and his aides had formed as “al Qaeda.” This decision was partly due to institutional conservatism and partly because the FBI had to apply conventional antiterrorism laws to an adversary that was in no sense a traditional terrorist or criminal organization.

Although bin Laden and his partners were able to create a structure in Afghanistan that attracted new recruits and forged links among preexisting Islamic militant groups, they never created a coherent terrorist network in the way commonly conceived. Instead, al Qaeda functioned like a venture capital firm—providing funding, contacts, and expert advice to many different militant groups and individuals from all over the Islamic world.

Today, the structure that was built in Afghanistan has been destroyed, and bin Laden and his associates have scattered or been arrested or killed. There is no longer a central hub for Islamic militancy. But the al Qaeda worldview, or “al Qaedaism,” is growing stronger every day. This radical internationalist ideology—sustained by anti-Western, anti-Zionist, and anti-Semitic rhetoric—has adherents among many individuals and groups, few of whom are currently linked in any substantial way to bin Laden or those around him. They merely follow his precepts, models, and methods. They act in the style of al Qaeda, but they are only part of al Qaeda in the very loosest sense. That's why Israeli intelligence services now prefer the term “jihadi international” instead of “al Qaeda.”

- much more . . .

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2536

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks
This article is quite informative. Thank you. But one thing makes me slightly skeptical -- why doesn't he mention the formative years. It's no secret after all. Robert Gates and Zbigniew Brzezinski positively brag about their role in setting it up and indirectly bringing about the break up of the Soviet Union as a result.

So why does this guy not mention it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. And what shall we call the 'coalition' Al- ?
Edited on Thu Apr-29-04 03:17 AM by keithyboy
"By Gavin du Venage in Cape Town
April 27, 2004
SOME of the worst human rights violators of the apartheid era, including a man who helped kill 14 civilians while they slept, have been employed as security contractors in Iraq.

A South African killed in Iraq two weeks ago once worked for a secret apartheid death squad known as the Civil Co-operation Bureau. The CCB specialised in assassinating civilians who sympathised with black liberation movements.

Gray Branfield, 55, was the latest South African casualty with a record of human rights abuse to have obtained lucrative employment with one of the many private security companies operating in Iraq. His decapitated and mutilated body was found after a gunfight between Shi'ite radicals and Ukrainian forces in Kut, 185km southeast of Baghdad."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=512562&mesg_id=512562
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliceWonderland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. So now
the magical morphing al Qa'eda is an ideology? “al Qaedaism"? That's great. I'll add that to the al Qa'eda folder on my hard drive -- that's where I put all the news stories of the various functions, purposes, structures, membership, and roles of this remarkable organization.

And it would have to be a remarkable organization. Because so much of the analysis is completely different. Sometimes, completely contradictory. Makes ya kinda wonder what this remarkable organization is. Never seen an group so adaptable since the Barbapapa family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC