Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you advocate mandatory military training in lieu of a draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would you advocate mandatory military training in lieu of a draft
Training and service such as Israel and the Swiss have, two years obligation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. In Israel, three years of active service is required
for men, and two years for women. I think Switzerland is a better example of what you're trying to promote.

I don't think that's such a bad idea. Perhaps that would give us all the impression that we have a stake in defending our nation and knowing that we could defend our country if we had to. It might end some of this viscious partisan bickering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would hazard a to guess you're a vet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, unless you're being sarcastic (and I'm not saying you are)
Edited on Wed Apr-21-04 02:04 PM by rockymountaindem
then I'm flattered :)

Nope, no veteran here. Just a 17 year old military buff.

If you're wondering about why I said what I said about Swiss-style mandatory service, I'll explain. The Swiss have no army. Instead, every citizen (I don't know if they include women) recieve military training and then brush up their skills periodically throughout their lives. There isn't rampant militarism in Switzerland, but everyone knows how to shoot and also basic military maneuvers like our soldiers learn at boot camp. The Swiss, however, require each home to be equipped with a military-style assault rifle and 400 rounds of ammunition. I wouldn't exactly want to see that in America.

So if we put a similar plan into action in America, every person could go to basic training after high school, then go back to civilian life with the skills they learn there. Then, if we ever had a WWII situation again where massive numbers of forces were needed, people would already have some military experience.

More importantly, it would give everyone a sense that they were ready and able to contribute to their country if they had to. Of course, modern militaries require much more training than the average citizen would recieve under such a program, but everyone would know in the back of their minds that their country could depend on them if need be.

Furthermore, it would help bridge the socio-economic gap if people like the children of Senators had to train with farmers' sons and inner-city kids. I think it would foster a sense of community without really interrupting people's lives. It would also give everyone a taste of what the voulnteer, full-time military does every day, so perhaps we would not be so quick to send them into battle.

It would kinda silence all those who are so quick to call people traitors, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. correct, I was not being sarcastic. Thanks for the posting, much
Edited on Wed Apr-21-04 02:32 PM by Demonaut
more indepth than mine but is exactly what I think this would accomplish., on edit, I first read your post as "17 year military buff" but you're only 17? I've read your posts before and you write incredibly well. In Grand Junction right? Denver for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But why...?
Why do you want to learn to kill people? Does anyone seriously think that any force is going to try to invade the US? I'm not attacking anyone here personally, really, but this American emphasis on being "strong" in a military way is one of the things which causes your country to be seen as, at best, a bully, by the rest of the world and, at worst, a "we are the biggest, toughest, strongest, best country in the world and you better not fuck with us or we'll bomb you back into the Stone Age" terrifying Imperialistic power.

I don't doubt your sincerity or your sense but it worries me that you equate giving people a training in aggression and homicidal tendencies with being in a position to "contribute to their country". Is this what a country really needs? You talk as if there is some chance that an enemy force will land on your shores and threaten your homes. None of the recent wars that the US has started/been involved in had anything to do with the American way of life being threatened. We all know that no-one is in Iraq to stop the Iraqis marching down the streets of NYC.

The Swiss have managed to remain neutral through the horrors of this century and their reward has been to end up as the world's bankers. Their record hardly stands as an example of anything other than a willingness to do business with anyone and a reluctance to take a stand on anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Mandatory service should move the dynamic you speak of from
gung-ho militarism to defense of nation. Imagine if EVERYONE had to go through mandatory training. That would put quite a bit more pressure on the chickenhawks when their kids are involved. Currently only DEMOCRAT Tim Johnson of South Dakota has a kid involved in bush*s War on Terra! How many wars would be going on now if Privates Barbara and Jenna were in the 101st?



You talk as if there is some chance that an enemy force will land on your shores and threaten your homes. None of the recent wars that the US has started/been involved in had anything to do with the American way of life being threatened. We all know that no-one is in Iraq to stop the Iraqis marching down the streets of NYC.

Give bush* four more years and we'll be so vulnerable we may all be learning Chinese in 2007

The Swiss have managed to remain neutral through the horrors of this century and their reward has been to end up as the world's bankers. Their record hardly stands as an example of anything other than a willingness to do business with anyone and a reluctance to take a stand on anything.

I'd say with a take like that, mr. blur is an apt choice for a name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. its more than about homocidal tendencies or about aggression
we will always have those who glorify war and aggression but we lack a true understanding what war is really like, "An Army of One" says it all, playstation warcraft and implies as much. I nor most of us here want world domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, but ...
I would support more programs such as the Peace Corps or VISTA so that young people could volunteer to work in this country and/or overseas and learn skills that they can use in their future. I also would support providing the volunteers with some of the same benefits that the military provides like college tuition assistance. Back in the 1940s, my father worked for the Civilian Conservation Corps and there was also the WPA available to provide jobs for people. These are the kinds of things I think this country should be doing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. ok, make it optional, peace corps or military service?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Greece has 1 or 1 1/2 for all men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. can we rig the tunnels with explosives?
please...please!! *jumps up and down*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Once sanity is restored to the government, yes.
That means no more neo-con stranglehold on the repuke party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC