|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:37 PM Original message |
Does anyone approve of drug testing on the job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyending (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. job categories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TimMooring (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. Job performance should be the criteria |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
50. tests should extent to being high/drunk on the job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HornBuckler (978 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. I Agree Wholeheartedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaveThePlanet2 (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. So you don't mind the guy,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 08:03 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Problem is, these tests don't work that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
52. of course we mind. but we have rights in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 05:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
139. I'm far more concerned that that same truck driver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timdoodle (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Quinnox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonemachine (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 07:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. I think we need more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
54. DISAGREE TOTALLY - they shouldn't come to work high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
72. Another example - crane operator, welder (esp. if he is welding things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
135. how often have you witnessed someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. I DO approve of testing for "drugs" such as: stupidity, greed, lying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopthegop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. dons flame proof suit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. I guess I'll don mine too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
40. not quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
51. So the 4th amendment has no bearing in the workplace? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
55. I have a question about your reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #55 |
77. Let's say you are a regular drug user |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #77 |
127. then it's not about drugs at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 06:27 PM Response to Reply #127 |
142. I agree. I was totally off the mark on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Only for undercover drug agents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. yes I agree with drug testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. If I do drugs on my own time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. But that's not what drug tests determine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgetrimmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
39. Does Kerry support job drug testing, if so do you now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
93. Please ask that question again at a later date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgetrimmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 03:56 PM Response to Reply #93 |
137. Funny, non-answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KTM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's all about Insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Yes, but does that explain the cost of drug testing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 07:45 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Standard urine testing costs about $15-20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Hmmm...guess I was wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:08 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. It may be, for some companies- if so, they need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gpandas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #48 |
87. nice to see somebody... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:11 PM Response to Reply #87 |
103. Agreed- speaks to character |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #103 |
130. That's a relief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. Deleted message |
gulfcoastliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
53. Amen brother...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. when alchohol is the real scourge on society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. Tough call, because alcohold is not tested for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
18. If there were better tests...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
78. "If the drugs don't ruin our life WE will." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. My pee belongs to me n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. I agree with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. But they can use all the alcohol that they want legally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 07:51 AM Response to Reply #21 |
44. Huge diference between use/abuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:24 AM Response to Reply #21 |
59. here comes the requested (but thoughtful) flame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
22. IMO, drug testing is an invasion of privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. No, it's an invasion of privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. here's a funny one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. Bring 'em on down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
29. Only where there is a 'for cause' situation that is performance related |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
30. the constitution doesn't approve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty48197 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
31. The constitution says it's OK to search people to see if they did anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 08:20 AM Response to Reply #31 |
47. not without a warrant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
109. Not in the least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobinA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
32. Employment Drug Testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
33. All good questions, significant facts that may be of interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
121. I wish more people knew this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yes, I do it every day...Wait, you said drug TESTING. Absolutely not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
35. I approve of drug TAKING on the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-15-04 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
38. Do I approve of drug testing on the job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
41. I approve drug testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:43 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I approve of drug testing , too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seldona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
46. Never. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:22 AM Response to Reply #46 |
57. To bad not all people always do it on their own time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Nor will they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. My privacy rights doesn't hurt people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. But testing doesn't conclude if people take drugs on the job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Thanks for ignoring my question! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:55 AM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Nice disingenuous deflection -- too bad I caught it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. You lost any respect I had for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Another nice attempt at deflection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
104. Never? Ever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
56. All jobs should have drug testing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Does that include alcohol and nicotine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #62 |
83. Still waiting for an answer to this, freetobegay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Still waiting.... are you going to answer the question, freetobegay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
89. So how do you address the point that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. freetobegay isn't interested in addressing that point, comsymp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:07 PM Response to Reply #91 |
100. Sadly, many of the pro-testers (!?) don't care to address that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
58. Yes..the company can set terms of employment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. can the terms of employment include a search of your residence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #60 |
68. No, but the company sets the terms of employment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. But drug testing doesn't determine whether or not you're high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. On the contrary, required federal CDL testing includes alcohol testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. But over what time period does it detect alcohol use? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. You're right - I think. I'm pretty sure it only detects alcohol use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. With which I have absolutely no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. I understand what you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #90 |
107. how did your company come to that attitude/policy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:08 PM Response to Reply #107 |
123. Informal, unwritten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #123 |
131. when someone is drug tested in the workplace they receive the results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. I really have no idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comsymp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #74 |
108. But that isn't a standard Substance Abuse Panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cheezus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:10 PM Response to Reply #68 |
124. I was never talking about being under the influence at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
61. Only with probable cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
64. I'm conflicted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheepyMcSheepster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #64 |
99. there are ways to beat drug tests. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
65. absent probable cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tarheel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #65 |
113. MissMillie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
70. No - terrible infringment of rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elbowroom (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. no, I only test drugs at home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GiovanniC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
82. I Approve of Drug Testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
85. Yes, For the President Of The United States Only Though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
88. My general thoughts on drug testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #88 |
92. what a strange story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Oh I was definitely bothered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. But you should be careful about projecting this onto others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. I hear what you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:13 PM Response to Reply #98 |
126. now you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. Congratulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 12:59 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. 2 words: performance review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:01 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Okay, I understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. I'm curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:19 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. I have been married 21 years in May |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. You were close to a nervous breakdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Eventually, I made many visits to the psychologist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. To clarify, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:07 PM Response to Reply #112 |
122. so how did he break it to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:11 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. Boy, you really want to know all the sordid details, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. yes I want the sordid details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Okay, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #132 |
136. I guess its just a lucky break for you and your employer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #136 |
138. In my ignorance, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Sorry, but I can't get past this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:21 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Yeah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #106 |
115. so how do you feel about the family business policy/attitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. I'm not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:53 PM Response to Reply #106 |
116. So, I went to pick my son up at school, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
playahata1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #88 |
114. Drug Testing In Schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheepyMcSheepster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. money money money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #114 |
120. Yeah, my daughter's school did that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babzilla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #120 |
134. what if your husband had slipped your daughter some meth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 06:21 PM Response to Reply #134 |
140. I have gotten your point, babzilla |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guava Jelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
119. nope What i do on my own time is my business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-16-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
128. Only if the job involves lots of driving, flying.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC