Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean, Jews, Arab, the GOP, and the Michigan General

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:38 AM
Original message
Dean, Jews, Arab, the GOP, and the Michigan General
Dean, for those of you who don't know, is probably the sceond most pro-Jewish candidate in the primary, after Lieberman. His wife is Jewish, he raises his children secular-Jewish, and he is tied to AIPAC.

Now, there's no doubt that Jews will vote Democratic en masse. There are 26 Jewish Representatives of whom 1 is Republican, 1 is Socialist, and 24 are Democratic, and 11 Jewish Senators, of whom 2 are Republican and 9 Democratic (and the blaance would've probably been 1-10 had Wellstone not died).

My doubt is mostly about Arabs and Michigan. AFAIK, Arabs generally voted for Bush in 2000 because they are more middle- and upper-middle-class than most, and are also relatively socially conservative. In 2004, needless to say, they won't, not after Bush's benevolent policies toward Palestine and Iraq. Will Dean, who's pro-Israeli and pro-AIPAC, be able to attract them to the Democratic party? There are relatively a lot of Arabs in swing-state Michigan, which might lean more Democratic if the Democrats manage to attract Arab voters.

So, will pro-Israeli and pro-Jewish Dean be able to attract Arab voters in Michigan enough to make the state remain Democratic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dean opposed the Iraq-war. He will do fine with the Arab/Muslim vote (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's start saying "pro-Zionist" instead of "pro-Jewish"..
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 04:51 AM by expatriot
Call me nit picky for the terms, but I think if we start referring to people who support Zionism as "Pro-Jewish" or "Jewish" it opens us up to being called "anti-Jewish" or "anti-semetic."

I am anti-Zionist not anti-Jewish. I am also an avid Dean supporter and I have heard this/known this for a long time. Hey, I don't care for trial lawyers very much but I still liked Clinton.


Please don't use the term "pro-Jewish," it makes the anti-Zionist side look bad... the vast majority of us are so far from being anti-Jewish it is unbelievable... it is just a broad brush the pro-Zionists try and paint us with... you calling them "pro-Jewish" does not help at all.

)on edit: typos... prolly more... i am going to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Words, just words
Zionism is a word for Israeli, or rather Jewish, nationalism. One can't be pro-Zionist any more than one can be pro-liberal, pro-communist, or pro-pro-choice.

Dean's not really a Zionist; he's pro-Israeli in the sense that he supports AIPAC and is pretty pro-Israeli in the Arab-Israeli conflict (though not pro-Likud), but he's not a Zionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I know a lot of Jews who are anti-Zionist
and you have made a really good point. Many Jews don't like what has happened in Israel, and don't approve of Sharon and what is happening. They especially hate it when these people use "anti-Jewish" rhetoric to hide their own bad deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. If Dean makes it to the top of the ticket
I'd say yeah, he's likely to get their vote. AAs are not just steamed, but frightened about Bush and Ashcroft's heavy-handed enforcement of the Patriot Act. They may be next year's most cohesive Anyone But Bush demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. But...
...will Dean convince them that he'll be different? You can bet that Lieberman won't. Blacks, for example, are very Democratic but some Democrats won't inspire them enough to vote in sufficiently high numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, odious Joe wouldn't,
I agree. They'd probably stay home. But Dean has at least paid lip service to concerns about the Patriot Act's overreach. They know they'll get no relief from the government's hairy eyeball with Bush, I really don't think many of them will throw their lot with him next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. "So, will pro-Israeli and pro-Jewish Dean..."
I guess I am pro-Israeli and pro-Jewish also... I am just anti-Zionist. Jesus, dude... are trying to get people to think you are anti-semetic? We need to convince people in this country that it is possible to be anti-Zionist and not anti-Semetic... that it is possible to be anti-Israel and not anti-Israeli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. By pro-Israeli...
...I mean that he generally supports the Israeli position in the Arab-Israeli conflcit more than he does the Palestinian position. By pro-Jewish I mean that he has ties to Jewish groups such as AIPAC and that he raises his children secular-Jewish.

BTW, start a thread on Chomsky if you want me to reveal my full position on anti-semitism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. does pro-Islamic mean ties to Islamic groups such as Hezbollah?
By pro-Jewish I mean that he has ties to Jewish groups such as AIPAC

since you're a budding mathematician, allow me to describe it in set theory:

{Jewish groups} = {AIPAC, Tikkun, Gush-Shalom, ADL, Dreamworks, Not-In-My-Name, anti-Zionist Haredim, the Knesset...}
{AIPAC} ( {Jewish groups} <that's a "proper subset" if I could defeat html>
{Tikkun} ( {Jewish groups}

{pro-Israeli groups} = {AIPAC, ADL, the Knesset, Tom DeLay, ...}
{AIPAC} ( {pro-Israeli groups}
{Jewish groups} ^ {pro-Israeli groups} = {AIPAC, ADL, the Knesset, ...}

I can tell this is a lousy description of a Venn diagram, so I'll stand by the subject. Would it be more accurate to describe the Taliban as an "Islamic group" or "a violent subset of Islamic groups"?

One could argue that all Islamic groups are secretly violent Islamic groups, and all Jewish groups are secretly pro-Israeli groups. But one would be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Might come as a shock to you
The Prophet Mohammed had two Jewish wives, and didn't try to convert them. The Qu'ran says to respect the faiths of people of The Book, which means Jews and Christians, as they are part of the same spiritual lineage as Islam. In fifteenth century Moorish Spain, Jews were allowed to live and practice their faith-once the Moors were kicked out in 1492, the Christians who took over forced the Jews to convert or move.

The problem isn't with Jews, it's with Zionism, which can be defined as this idea that Jews and only Jews should have the right to live in the land around Jerusalem, and that they have the right to take lands of people who have lived there for centuries by any means possible, including terrorism.

I think what matters to Arab/Muslim Americans is what the candidate does rather than his faith. If the candidate seems reasonable and fair, they will vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. I am "pro-Jewish " and pro-Christain and pro- Islam and pro-Agnostic
What is the point of this thread?

That Arabs in Michigan are anti anyone who does not hate Jews?

Or are we discussing Sharon and the settlements and changing the route of the fence from the minor changes to the Green line discussed at Taba to the current land grab to include most settlements? - those I am anti - and I believe Dean is also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. redeye, listen to expatriot in post#2
and change your language from "pro-Jewish" to "pro-Isreal" and/or "pro-Zionist"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm locking this thread.
I don't know what "pro-Jewish" means.

We certainly wouldn't want our candidates to be supportive of Jews, would we? </sarcasm>

Skinner
DU Admin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. He's just whoring for money
It's not about "Jewish", 52% of American Jews think Americans for Peace Now (The liberal wing of the American Jewish community) has the right policies, Dean gave them the back of the hand and specifically said "No, I don't agree, I'm much closer to AIPAC's positions". American Jews that agree with AIPAC make up slightly more than 30% of American Jews and they probably vote Republican anyway.

AIPAC however has way, way deeper pockets and they aren't partisan, he knows he can get a nice chunk of change next election if he sucks up and says the right things. I don't know if he would actually do any of the things he says but every president since '67 has promised to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (no one ever does).

I have no idea how he would act toward Israel, based on past experience his policy team would probably reclassify the West Bank and Gaza as "disputed territory", dump more money at Israel but whine a lot more in public while privately covering for them.

I don't know what to do about it though, I mean unless Arab Americans start an organization like AIPAC this is how it's going to work in American politics and they aren't going to get a better deal from Bush honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC