Higher Powers are deciding that it's time for the Bush gang to go!!

[peabody71]

7/1/03
BEYOND BUSH
Powers above the White House are deciding that it's time for the Bush gang to go. As a Watergate-style take down is being meticulously put into place, the question is not whether the Bush Administration will be removed before or after the 2004 election. The important questions are whether Bush's successor will address 9/11, Peak Oil, civil liberties, or any of the critical issues. What is being done even now to control the challengers in the Presidential election? A clandestine drama is unfolding and we'll help you understand it. This special free series is a must-read going into 2004.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/index.html

[peabody71]

1. kick.

[opihimoimoi]

2. Yup, I knew it was a matter of time

the powers are embarrassed all to hell by their mistake in judgement. Their gamble this Shrub could pull it off failed, as did Carlyle found out all too well.

Bush is a failure everywhere he went.... and this man is the Prez??

I guess you might say it gives every LOLO in the nation a chance at being a Peter who reaches the TOP

Come, we form a group :puke:

[peabody71]

4. The problem is they will pick the Dem challenger.

My guess is Kerry.
This may be our chance though to get somebody through that can make a difference.
We have got to secure our vote!!!
http://www.POLLWATCH.org is a start.

[twilight]

3. what can you seriously expect

Pope John Paul II said to *, "Go to Iraq and you go without God." Now chimpy is hearing God talking to him. I say have the boyz in white come and take him away and lock him up! He needs to be on psychiatric drugs!

He is delusional, absolutely delusional as he leads our young people into one grizzly war after the next. Soon there will be few to fight. Then comes the draft. Then comes more death and more murdering.

All in *'s name, not in God's name.

* should have listened to the Pope! Damn idiot!!!

:kick:

[bandy]

5. Saw this post before

and wondered (as much as I like him) could Clark the their choice? He hasn't designated a party as yet. Don't know why he came to mind at that time.

[TLM]

7. Something about clark that worries me...

Is how he is just kind of floating along, ready to take any opening on either side.

We need less militaristic leadership, not more.

[Cocoa]

6. this kind of thinking helps the republicans

It degrades the democratic process.

I'd suggest people go to Dem candidates' events, or watch them on C-Span. The notion that anyone other than the voter will decide the election will evaporate.

[peabody71]

8. You need to do some homework.

We are notliving in a Democracy at this time.
the links @ http://www.POLLWATCH.org will be informative.
This may however open the door for us to restore Democracy if the populous is willing to get involved.

[Cocoa]

11. bookmarking that site

that looks like a very good cause, I'm going to look into what they're doing.

However, we ARE in a democracy. The 2004 election is the way to get rid of Bush.

[chiburb]

9. Lengthy, but well worth the read. n/t

.

[peabody71]

10. kick

.