Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOW we know why they gave Clinton so much hell....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:17 AM
Original message
NOW we know why they gave Clinton so much hell....
the whole 8 years of Clinton's tenure saw a constant attack on him by his republican sore loser enemies, now, it becomes obscenely clear why.

it was to throw him off track, employ several hundred f.b.i. agents to focus on his life and history, fishing for a crime they could pin on him with impeachment the ultimate goal. and all the while this attack was going on, the terrorists were sneaking up on us.

all of our so called intelligence agencies were DELIBERATELY turning their heads the other way, to clear the path for the inevitable terrorist attack on New York, and focusing their huge investigative lens on Clinton cheating on his wife.

and they will probably continue this obscenity, even if they lose the white house. cripple the sitting democratic president, at any cost, to make him ineffective and distracted.

it worked wonderfully didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. On Imus - just now- they were playing a tape of Clinton saying he did not
Edited on Tue Apr-13-04 07:22 AM by patricia92243
not have sex...etc. After all this time. The Republicans are starting to look major stupid to keep harping on something that old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Imus is pathetic
What a sour, cynical bottom-feeder! I will never understand how decent people go on his show and prostitute themselves. Is there some unwritten rule that requires every public figure to make a fool of themselves by kissing Imus' ring?

Grrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. let Imus play his tape over and over...
it will dawn on people that Clinton was doing something about terrorism while the Republicans were concentrating on stupidity.

BTW, how many FBI agents were running around after that blue-stained dress instead of running after terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindfulNJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I heard Imus say this morning
that Clinton was more to blame than the Chimp for 9-11. I'm beginning to think that it doesn't matter what * does or DOESN't do...he'll always come out smelling like a rose while dumping a load of manure on Clinton. The media whores are seeing to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Imus is an old.........
drunk and junkie. I mean, look at him! Shriveled up prune that never pays attention to hygiene. I've often wondered how bad that booth smells with he and his adolescent buddies in there every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this comes out in the 9-11 commission
"What exactly where all of those agents doing in Arkansas?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think their obsessions are becoming too revealing
They are a little too obsessed with sex (condemning it) and death (glorifying it and causing it).

Their freakiness is starting to pop out all over.

http://www.wgoeshome.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, Chimp and Condi's use of "Rape Pits" too many times in speeches.
I always wondered what that was. Got the impression they might have stayed up late at night at Camp David (Condi and Chimp) viewing photos of those "rape pits" to get their jollies.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I believe that BushCo was negotiating w/ B Laden for pipeline.
That's why they had to distract Clinton and the Intel kids, and that's why they ignored the Richard Clarke types and all of the warnings in 2001.
And they were too stupid and too wrapped up in their own CEO mentality hubris even to negotiate in good faith with an extremely rich madman.

The C- brigade is a bunch of losers... even in areas (biz and bullets)they think they're good at.

Just my two cents...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've noticed lately that pukes
who endlessly try to shift blame are saying the "previous administration" instead of the "Clinton administration". It's all an attempt to despoil and refocus attention on Clinton one way or the other. You know, Clinton was having oral sex when he should have been going after OBL.
Soon the horrible Iraq mess will become Clinton's fault. They are obsessed and cannot help themselves. Everything nasty and unforgivable will be Clinton's fault for these evil tyrants. Problem is that the unknowing buy right into this horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC