Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help! Was the 8/6/01 PDB originally 10-11 pages long or was it not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemLikr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 08:50 AM
Original message
Help! Was the 8/6/01 PDB originally 10-11 pages long or was it not?
And were the other 8-9 pages withheld from the public?

I've read the other, long thread about this and I'm still confused.

And if this PDB was much longer, and the public is only seeing two pages of it, why is THAT aspect not a much bigger part of the mainstream story?

Oh...never, mind about the mainstream press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The information that was leaked in Oct 2002
Edited on Mon Apr-12-04 08:55 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Said that the PDB was titled, "bin Ladin Determined to Strike in the US" which is the correct title, to the word and the report clearly stated that this PDB was eleven and a half pages long.

This info was from what we can find, was first published in a German weekly news publication. The name of the publication was mentioned in the other threads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dupe
Dupe :evilgrin:

Continue here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a new day
this topic deserves a new thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do you think the page nums were redacted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC