Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candy Crawly is a total whore for Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:22 AM
Original message
Candy Crawly is a total whore for Bush
I am sorry. I know people have said we shouldn't use that prejorative, but it fits here. She is on CNN now literally arguing with Ben-Veniste that the memo was meaningless, and "clearly" Bush couldn't have known anything was going to happen.

I am sorry. She is a whore for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was just thinking
....the same thing. In fact I got up to see if she was wearing a Bush/Cheney t-shirt. They did NOTHING with the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raenelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think people have said you shouldn't call her a FAT whore.
But a whore's a whore. Who could object to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Whore is.....subjective
...and fat is...well, I will let someone else conclude that line of thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. Porcine is not an abusive word is it?
In other words there is no deficiency in Candy's superfluousness, LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. has she always been so corpulent ? seems like I remember her
being less portly in years past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
60. I'm gonna call her a "sow" and a "whore"
or will the PC police knock up upside the head?

We call mediawhores "whores" regardless of their gender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. How about "sick whore?"
Edited on Sun Apr-11-04 02:00 PM by mouse7
I assume nobody is going to claim her current medical condition is a healthy one.

I can live with calling Ol' Candy a sick whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Watching it.....she IS a bush licking whore.......
Grasping at straws to defend the commander in chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
51. She was on Jon Stewart one time
and claimed to be a little `O Democratic gal. Cough cough .. Jon was fairly light with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. But, but, but
you can't say that they could have known. Can't believe she and CNN could be so obvious. She has no pretense of not covering up for Bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is the first time I have really watched her
I cannot believe how argumentative she is for the bush group.

I have never seen blitzer this blatant

Ven-Venste is putting her in her place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. She kept interrupting him when he didn't say what she wanted...

...must have went to the Faux school of journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. yep
I just mentioned that she is trying her best to save *'s sorry ass.

Ben is calmly trying to straighten the ignorant bitch out.

She just cut him off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. And CONSTANTLY trying to bring the whole thing back to Clinton!!!!
This is beyond the pale. As Ben-Veniste keeps pointing out, and she totally ignores, Clinton thwarted the 2000 millennium terror plot, and this PDB issue is about what BUSH* knew and did before 9/11!
:mad::nuke::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. But B-V nicely turned that around that it was apples and oranges
and shut her up on that score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Yes, I was very impressed with his ability to spin her around, as it were.
Candy Crappy wouldn't know the truth if it smacked her on her smirking Repuke jowls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Damn skippy! She has a bright future at Fox coming...
<EOM>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. She's a TOOL
As are so many others.

:puke:

http://www.wgoeshome.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezee Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Candy is a ......
not only for CNN but for **. She is continuing to try to spin this to * favor. She keeps harping on the partisan part of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. How many times in
10 minutes has she used the word "partisian"? A word out there for Bush fanatics to wrap themselves around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. She's a detestible sycophant.
She's incapable of hiding her bias and doesn't deserve any credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
70. A perfect summation
Add to the list Wolf Blitzer, Bill Schneider, Paula Zahn, Jack Cafferty, Judy Woodruff and Daryn Kagen.
All Bush sycophants.
Time Inc. has been shilling for the Grand Oil Party since the days of Charles Luce. Too bad Turner sold CNN to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. creepy crawly (crowley)
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. I was thinking the same dang thing- *Will the public see the 911
commission as partisan?" (to R B-V) -No, not unless you keep shilling for Bush and suggesting that it is at every juncture and quoting Thompson, who seems to be more partisan than most.

I noticed that she quoted things that really tried to present B-V in a poor light (like the WSJ quote about being "obsessed" or basically, didn't you lighten up in your questioning on Clarke versus pressuring Condi? Pah!

Why shouldn't there be something flashing on the screen "Opinions only spoken here, not news!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. She's the actual elephant
they will trot out for the repugs convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. LOL....kind of mean, but funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. We all know what she is but
she really went over the line today. I am getting my E-mail ready to send to CNN. Not that they ever acknowledge them, but this should not be let go. She was horrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Me Too!
Let's all please email CNN with our disgust!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. You Stole My Post!
Edited on Sun Apr-11-04 11:33 AM by Stevendsmith
I kid you not, I just came to my computer to write a post titled "Candy Crowley is a Bush Whore."

HOW MORE OBVIOUS OF A SHILL CAN THAT WOMAN BE?!!!!!

That "interview" just killed me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. Once a whore always a whore
Candy "covered" * for CNN for the 2000 campaign. Once she'd done their bidding, (right after the theft of the election) she disappeared for a while. It's no surprise that she's shamelessly whoring for * again. She is blatant. She is the worst. We need to bombard CNN with anti- Candy e-mails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. During the 2000 elections
I remember reading how even CNN was worried about how Candy had "bonded" with the Bush* team. I had expected them to reassign her, but it never happened. She's continuing in that vein, and even gives speeches that show her bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. This is a very serious issue
If any DUers have examples of the biased e-mails and speeches that have been mentioned, we need to post them. During the primaries, Candy was covering and smearing Dean, because he seemed to be the nominee. Kelly Wallace was covering Kerry. We need to stop Crowley from being assigned to Kerry's campaign. We can't let her do the same thing to Kerry that she did to Gore. We amy not like it, but the reality is that CNN has a lot of influence with the average voter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
53. I remember hearing that the *ies were giving her presents and treats.
She reacted just like any well trained circus pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. They gave her a nickname, too
Dulce (sweet)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I thought bu$h* gave her the nickname "The Butterqueen"
which, to me, is insulting but guess Candy thinks that makes her real special?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. you think she's biased on AIR
you should see her emails within the company!!!


she's so biased she can't even SEE straight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
61. Tell us more!
I guess you work for CNN--
Please, give us some details! Anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. She has been for a VERY long time...
Anyone watching her coverage of the midterm elections could have NO doubt as to where her loyalties lay.

Everytime she announced a state going GOP she was practically orgasmic -- and that is NOT hyperbole!

And when a state went Dem she had this tight little smile on her face that said it all.

She is a whore. There's no better word to call her.

And what does anybody else here remember what she got for her GOP fawning? Why an invitation to Donnie Rumsfeld's private holiday party, that's what!

Can you see Helen Thomas accepting such an invitation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. done that already
my email was sent out pronto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Now she's arguing with Nelson
Same shit, different senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. She's trying to do the same thing to Sen. Nelson
She is SO unbelievable, she's worse than anyone on Fox except Jared as far as 'reporters' go. She is just unbelievable.

E-maill to CNN right now as soon as I hit the 'send' button here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. I am sick of her...
but boy what an appropriate first name because I bet she consumes quite a bit of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Let Cnn know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. The fat B------h
didn't sing today, she filibustered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
33. I just sent my email to CNN about Crowley.
I told CNN that we know she is an admirer of Bush, but if she wants to campaign for him to do it on her own time. She is not objective and turned her interview into an inquisition, and it was insulting.
Now she is doing the same thing with one of the Democratic commissioners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. She has John Dean on
let's see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Old Candy...
Dean doesn't like the fact that people were dying - that's probably OK with Creepy Crawly - C. Boyden Gray is subdued.

Dean was sending up flares as to the path they were going down, the path of secrecy is pandemic - Gray: the Admin. got a bad rap from the cheney task force (!) - he's defending the oil barons, no secrets about the task force and NOT THAT MANY SECRETS IN THE WH! what crap!
openness and cooperation unprecedented. !!!!!!!!!!

Dean: ridiculous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. Dean Cleaned her clock
one thing about these Nixon folk - they were really really smart. They also knew when to give up - they were that smart. This crowd doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
37. Candy should be at the pig farm doing the Easter thing
with all the other pigs. I wonder if Condi & junior are drunk yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Can't you just envision her
doing a little jig with her piggy pals! Then set the scene to the tune of Old Mcbush*s Farm :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. ....`ya mean like square dancing her ass off and squealing like
a real farm animal having fun? I got the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Yeah, that's it!
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
39. The NeoCons keep her supplied with 5-lb Whitman Sampler boxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. IloveCandy Crowley......the human refrigerator
loved the tag team with her and Gray on Dean

and did you notice that unprecedented is the talking point intitiated by Hughes?

he said it at least twice, once w/regard to the junta's cooperation with the 911 commission, and the other time (a FLAT OUT LIE!) concerning condi's unprecedented testimony.

unfortunately, neither the piglet nor Dean brought him up on that.

WHY do you think she TESTIFIED AT ALL, Jabba the Hutlette?

too bad you "forgot" that PICTURE of the Truman guy holding his HAND up sixty years ago.

that's the ONLY ONLY ONLY reason she went before the commission

good reporting, you festering lump of bovine spongiform related activity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. OK, now tell us how you feel about her! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vetwife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. 2000 she traveled with Bush and Co Remember?
Wonder what all they promised her and what all she had to do ?
Trained elephant riding with the GOP.. That necklace she wore today really made her look like she had a rash. Not much of a clothes horse either. Elephants ..sorry wrong animal !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
76. Your post made me bookmark this thread
so many wonderful posts about our lovely Candy, but yours seems to finally do the lady justice.

I bow to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. This beeyatch keeps interrupting anyone trying to counter Bush & Co.
Edited on Sun Apr-11-04 11:56 AM by KeepItReal
Hate to call names, but man she is friggin annoying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
45. My e-mail to CNN
Candy Crawley is an embarrasment to your network. No anchor on CNN is so blatantly partisan. I am disgusted at her very obvious campaigning for George Bush, cloaked as an interview. The only thing she is missing is her blue BUSH/CHENEY t-shirt.

If your goal it to woo the brain-dead audience at Fox, Candy is your man. I'm fed up with CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. nice. I applaud that
Okay, I'm gearing up to e-mail them right now ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. hey, email em this THREAD
somebody there will get some HUGE laffs!

huge, just like Arny from Garry Shandling's Show sed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. what the hell is the difference between her and CNN?
CNN is the most vile slime on the video. Give me Fox or MSNBC where they dont have any pretense to a historical claim of relevance or journalism. If I worked for those fucks at CNN I would either apply at McDonalds for a little respectability or kill myself in pursuit of dignity for my surviving family members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Momma Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. AMEN
She kinda looks like Meatloaf too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Sucks Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
71. You took the words right out of my mother...
Ha...Like the reference,eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. WH has promised gastric bypass, extreme makeover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
56. She just propped up one of the about two 9/11 family members who actually
think * is God. He was sitting next to Creepy Crawley, while the majority 9/11 families' opinion spokeswoman was relegated to video conferencing. :puke::puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
59. you want to know what the sad pathetic truth is?
If people emailed CNN and said she was a biased journalist, it's obvious her objectivity is compromised and because of that we'd go elsewhere for news, they wouldn't touch her.

If CNN received a thousand emails that she was fat and ugly, and we'd rather see TV faces like Solidad Obrien and Paula Zahn, we'd see a lot less of Candy.

And as pissed off as that would make me, I'm so disgusted with Candy that I'd advocate that strategy.

Further evidence Bush brings the worst out in everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. good idea


she looks like a third string lineman from Nebraska

if you put her in a crewcut, they'd have to test for steroids

uglier than a pan of worms

she's LUCKY she's so fat.....I concentrated on her face for as long as I could, with the sound down, and wished I was a bulimic.....just pop in a tape and I'd never have to stick a hand down throat again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. I agree. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. I really believe that beauty is in the eye of the beholder,
but in Candy's case what we see is what we get:an UGLY :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #59
75. in my e-mail to them I did BOTH
I ranted about how partisan she was, how obvious it was, how she should go to Fox where they can give her a makeover and dye her hair blond and, well, that just happened to segue into how hard she is to look at and how she proves:

that beauty is skin deep but ugly is to the bone.

She is certainly ugly to the bone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. "I Love" Candy Crowley is a whore who fanatsizes...
chimpy* actually has something big enough to suck on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. That must be her "bring it on" fantasy!
Poor Candy, she doesn't know it was just a sock! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
69. Can't stand her.
Did you see the two family members of the WTC victims? One of them was a senior staff member for the President and blew nothing but sunshine about Condi and the memo. 3000 people with families and they pick this guy to give his opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
73. I agree
Candy was so awful this morning I got disgusted and changed channels before the program was over. She made sure the Republicans got the last word, sharply questioned Ben Veniste and Dean, and kept mentioning President Clinton in an effort to deflect blame from the current administration. It was a terrible display of bias. I watch CNN less and less these days and will never watch another program of which Crowley is host.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
74. I think Candy (Creepy Crawley) Crowley should become the poster girl
for our 'Ugly Repuke' adm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC