Why doesn't the media ask why, the delay in response on 9/11 ?

[Timefortruth]

It is the heart of the matter. Assuming (for the sake of argument)that they didn't have enough information to stop the attack, why didn't they react immediately when the attacks happened. I know we dwell on this issue, but by now why hasn't someone in the idiotic media had this thought occur to them?

Couldn't that have saved lives?

How can they miss it? How can the public not ask themselves?

[stepnw1f]

1. Why Indeed...

[bunk76]

2. This is a serious issue....

the sad part is the"liberal media" is not at all serious.They have the information,they just do not have the guts to do their jobs.The pay check outweighs the need for the general public to know the truth.

[DemLikr]

3. If they ask NOW, it will only highlight the fact they didn't fucking...

...ask two fucking years ago!!!!

The dominant media has been knowingly sitting on this ALL ALONG.

How can they possibly cover it now without admitting that they should have covered it as news when it happened?

:crazy:

[SarahB]

4. Anyone who did ask questions

two years ago were told they were un-American. Actually, in alternative sources (internet, some PBS, BBC news), there were things being said, but major sources didn't run with it yet. The companies still needed to work with the * junta at the time due to their own financial interests in his smash and grab corporate tax cuts.

[senseandsensibility]

6. You're right

However, the press has been asking a lot of questions lately that they should have asked two years ago. And they don't seem in the least embarrassed. poor self-deluded things.

[radiclib]

5. Too many questions lead to unthinkable conclusions

like LIHOP :tinfoilhat: Can't go there.