Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush has 2 choices: Incompetence (or) Dishonesty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 04:36 PM
Original message
Bush has 2 choices: Incompetence (or) Dishonesty
If they (the Bush admin.) didn't know the Niger document was forged- then their intelligence failed (or they didn't know how to interpret it) and they must plead incompetence.
If they did know and lied about it, then they must admit they were dishonest.

It seems obvious they are going to plead incompetence. This would be consistent with the intelligence failure of 9/11. In either case, I don't see how they can survive this politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Survive by controlling the media
If indeed they can continue to do. As long as Americans are constantly told how popular he is and how no one cares about lies and incompetence, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Terrence J Wilkinson says he knew and didn't care
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2518.shtml

An intelligence consultant who was present at two White House briefings where the uranium report was discussed confirmed that the President was told the intelligence was questionable and that his national security advisors urged him not to include the claim in his State of the Union address.

"The report had already been discredited," said Terrance J. Wilkinson, a CIA advisor present at two White House briefings. "This point was clearly made when the President was in the room during at least two of the briefings."

Bush's response was anger, Wilkinson said.

"He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."
-----------

I'm not sure why more people aren't hearing about this. Is that Wilkinson guy not still alive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is this the smoking gun or NOT??
Damn, this should be on front page of every rag across the world

Not even the best of spinmeisters can handle this one and sleep good at night

Come, we get a lie filter for those guys. Relying on emotion and anger gets despots the can, sooner or later, as Murphy sez so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swalker24 Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. What about
Incompetence AND Dishonesty. They where too interested into justifying their little war that they didn't do the necessary homework with their 'evidence'.

The blame should not be shifted to the intelligence community. Donald Rumsfeld got a hard-on everytime he talk about having a war, the administration wanted it and they took the easiest possible route to get it. The intellegence community collected all the information to call into question the intel that the bloodthirsty idiots used. The intelligence community did their job. Bush etal, didn't. So I say they where dishonest and incompetent when they built their case, they could have removed the glaring mistakes, but chose not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Indeed, the intelligence community did do their job
perhaps they did it on 9/11 as well, and that is why Bush blocks the investigation. Seems all too obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. same two choices during the Harken "scandal"
he was one of two people on the auditing committee who should have definitly known about Harken's shady accounting and impending doom.

once again, here we have it: he's either incompetent, dishonest, or perhaps most likely, BOTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. same 2 choices Nixon had.
Stupid?
or
Crooked?
It actually turned out to be both.
Stupid enough to think he could get away with being crokked.
I hope the same thing happens to *, except I DON'T want him to skip out 2 jumps ahead of the (impeachment) posse.
I want to see him there for the whole satisfying degradement.
If we could bring back the pillory in DC, I'd buy a plane ticket to come and spit on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. * is ...
an INCOMPETENT LIAR! You cannot find anything worse than that!!

Show * the door in '04! I am sick of his LIES!!!!!!!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC