Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds on govexec.com re: Rice testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:56 AM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds on govexec.com re: Rice testimony
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0404/040804c1.htm

Rice's testimony varies from that of former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, who testified before the commission, as well as the Senate Judiciary and Senate Select Intelligence committees.

Edmonds was hired to retranslate material that was collected prior to Sept. 11 and worked for the FBI from Sept. 20, 2001 to March 2002. In her review, Edmonds said documents clearly showed that the hijackers were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles.

"If they want to back up what they're saying, they should just make these documents public and let the documents speak for themselves," Edmonds said Thursday. "There are many documents out there that would prove what they knew, when they knew and how they knew."

Previous commission hearings also highlighted failures of agencies such as the CIA and FBI to collect and share information with each other and with other federal agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration and the State Department. Officials have testified that if specific information on al Qaeda operatives was disseminated, the State Department could have put them on watch lists and denied them visas, which would have prevented them from entering the country, and the FAA could have prevented them from flying on planes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's some speculation
That the Republicans want to release the documents; but want us to go out on a limb and claim that they are smoking guns first. Plus by resisting and then giving in they can sort of edit around the documents that paint them in a negative light ("Well in a show of good faith we are going to release this poem Ms. Rice wrote, praising President Bush.") Sort of political jiu jitsu. I don't know what to think of that, myself.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is like trying to bring
down the berlin wall -- we here at du and other places KNOW condi is lying and have evidence that refutes what she said but the rest of america is in the dark.
either because they willingly have participated in the presidents incompetent ways or because the evidence will not be made on major media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC