Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Modest Proposal for the Middle East

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 08:05 PM
Original message
A Modest Proposal for the Middle East
Edited on Tue Aug-05-03 08:06 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
We advocate the invasion of Saudi Arabia and the arrest, trial and execution of the elites who underwrote terrorist acts in Israel and the terrorist attacks in the United States on 9/11. Wahhibism shall be removed as the offical, state-sanctioned religion and its practitioners shall be forbidden to enforce its "moral" precepts on those who do not adhere to them. The Saudi Arabian ban on the travel and residency of people of Jewish heritage shall be eliminated and state-sponsored anti-semitic propaganda shall cease.

Egypt shall be punished for its state-sponsored anti-semitic propaganda by witholding the 3 billion dollars of annual aid given by the United States.

Syria shall stop all funding of militant Islamic groups within Israel and the occupied territories. Any violation sponsored by or tacitly approved by the Syrian government shall be grounds for immediate military action and possible occuption.

Iran shall stop all funding of militant Islamic groups within Israel and the occupied terrirtories. Any violation sponsored by or tacitly apporved by the Iranian government shall be grounds for immediate military action and possible occupation.

We advocate the removal of the Sharon Government as well as the Palestinian Authority and the liberation of the Israeli and Palestinian people from their corrupt, evil leaders.

The experiment of a homeland for the Jewish people based on religious and ethnic identity has failed and is no more defensible or morally right than an Aryan homeland. At its root it is fundamentally racist and there is no moral argument for its existence.

Israel has weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons and has violated many more U.N. resolutions than Iraq. These facts coupled with Israel's constant human rights violations of the indigenous Arab population of the land occupied during the 1967 war and Israel's refusal to cease settlements illegal under international law demand swift action.

The security wall currently under construction shall be blown up and all Israeli settlements illegal under international law shall be destroyed. Anyone who resists shall be subject to military tribunals and execution as an enemy combatant.

Arafat shall be imprisoned, the Palestinian Authority disbanded and Hamas and Islamic Jihad crushed through the use of military force. Anyone who resists shall be subject to military tribunals and execution as an enemy combatant.

Occupational rule shall be established over Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and a single, unified democratic government established. New leaders representative of both the Jewish and Arab populations of the American occupied territory shall be chosen by representatives of the United States government and shall be consulted during the creation of the new government. The Constitution shall include democratic provisions and guarantee the right of every citizen, regardless of ethnic or religious identity, to equal treatment under the law and municipal codes. Religious monuments shall remain as they currently are - any decimation or destruction of religous monuments shall be swiftly and severly punished. As most religious monuments are of a shared heritage, they shall be open to all people regardless of ethnic or religous identity. Power shall be handed over to a local provisional government once stability is established and elections replacing the provisional leaders shall be phased in one a year, every year over 6 years. Only, at the end of 6 years, after a fully constitutional and democratic government is established shall the United States cease to occupy the territory.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who is we?
Sounds great, if you can get the Federation to do it. Let the Vulcans run the planet.

But you're not talking about the United States are you? In that case, you're talking about World Wars Four through Nine, at least.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yes Edicts from the Far Out Realm

Beyond SDI. That is how it struck me too. I would prefer AmeriKa be held in line as well, but it seems these dictates are coming rom "The Realm Beyond" I am wonder which galaxy get the bit on its new flag, emblem and logo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. sounds a little familiar
Edited on Tue Aug-05-03 08:30 PM by Aidoneus
Maybe Donald Rumsfeld or Richard Perle and their faction would like it, if you'd just remove the parts about Israel. As if the problem was not enough US aggressions and occupations..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. What Happens To The Israeli's
who would refuse to give up their state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Imprisoned as enemy combatants or killed
Just like what happens to the "dead-ender" Iraqis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. You
mean like the Final Solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. No, I mean like Iraq
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 09:26 AM by ThorsteinVeblen
Most Israelis want nothing but peace and a chance to live and grow and prosper with their Palestinian neighbors. The problem with Israel is the leadership - just like in Iraq. You remove the cancer at the head of the beast and then let it heal itself.

Those who are part of the cancer and can't be cured must fall by the wayside. There will be no pogrom or death camps. There will only be military action against those who resist liberation. Those who don't fight until the death will be tried by Military Tribunal and appropriately punished if found guilty of any crime.

The same exact policy for any Arab/Islamic militants who refuse to submit to our new vision of peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Most Israeli's
want a two state solution. You could fit those Israelis who want to surrender their sovereignty and live in a multi ethnic state in a phone booth.

The whole exercise is academic since comparisons between the IDF and the Iraqis are laughable.

The Israeli's literally have the ability to turn the entire Middle East into radioactive rubble; a power Saadam could only dream of having.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. "Comparisons between the IDF and the Iraqis are Laughable"
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 09:45 AM by ThorsteinVeblen
Only in that the IDF is better armed than the regular Iraqi army.

"The Israeli's literally have the ability to turn the entire Middle East into radioactive rubble; a power Saadam could only dream of having."

Even more of a reason to invade now. Israel is much more dangerous than Iraq ever was.


"Most Israelis want a two state solution"

No, most Israelis want to live in peace and prosper and are not idelogues. They want a practical, workable solution. Our contention is that a two state solution is not viable. Israel will demand control over the water rights in the West Bank and is already in the process of ethnically cleansing East Jerusalem through abuse of racist municipal codes. Any chunk of land left over after Israel is done will be akin to an American Indian reservation or a South African "homeland". It will not be a viable state. Thus the violence will continue and Israel will see no peace.

Again the problem is that the a state based on religous or ethnic identiy is fundamentally racist and will continue to foment violence until it is cured of its racist character.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. You Can't Invade
because of their nuclear deterrent.

Confronted with your doomsday scenario they would definitely "shoot their wad" which would literally result in over 100,000,000 deaths. Do the math, they are rumored to have 300-400 nuclear missiles each one at least one hundred time stronger than the ones we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The devestation would be mind boggling.

The Israeli's were not really better armed than the Iraqis. Just better trained and better motivated. I know for a fact that Iraq had the fourth largest military in the world prior to Gulf War 1 if standing army and armarments is your measure.

There is no support in Israel for a one state solution.I'd like to see one survey that suggests there is.

Your plan in it's current form is unworkable.

I favor a two state solution to the apocalypse but hey, we're all doing what we can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Who is Israel going to bomb?

1.) Themselves? I don't even Sharon is this stupid.

2.) The U.S.? They don't have missles with that kind of range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. How About
3) Their nemesises- the Arabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. Why would Israel bomb the Arabs if the US was also invading
Saudi Arabia at the same time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. I Don't Know
Settle old scores.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Any nuclear attack by Israel would be met tenfold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #44
52. Actually -
under your scenario I could see an Israeli-Arab rapprochement with the Israelis and Arabs fighting the American imperialists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Well if we can't unite them in the "road to peace" might as well unite
them this way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL you're on a roll with this ThorsteinVeblen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. And I thought Wolfie was mad
Heck, you got him beat with this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Who's Wolfie
And it sounds like Mr. Veblen wants to precipitate the end of the world.

I prefer to muddle through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Paul Wolfowitz? *nt*
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Exactly
The one and only. Until this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Paul Wolfowitz is a Likudnik
And would never advocate the invasion of Israel nor the destruction of its existence as a Jewish homeland.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. A more modest proposal
Instead of favoring one side or the other (they are all morally corrupt and insufferable and determined to drive each other from the face of the earth)...let's sell arms to both sides. No favoritism and no gifts. Let them blow each other up, since it is clear that is what both sides are determined to do to their last breaths.

The world will be a better place when they've finished eliminating each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. here is another idea
Edited on Tue Aug-05-03 09:36 PM by Wonder
In a passing conversation I had with someone at a sushi restaurant, this guy I was talking to came up with this:

Since this whole thing seems to hinge upon who will possess the HolyLand. He suggested to set a date, before which all in the area would be evacuated to a safe distance away. And once all were evacuated bomb the damned place to smithereens. Then no one can have it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Favoring a side
Hmmm, could it be that the U.S. favors the side that favors us? Favors the side that has been our ally throughout the Cold War till now?

No, that would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. And what, exactly, does an alliance with Israel
do to enhance America's geopolitical security?

Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Nothing
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 09:05 AM by ThorsteinVeblen
But the invasion and transformation of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip from a Jewish homeland to a secular, inclusive, non-ethnicity based Democracy is beneficial for everyone including the US except for the Israeli and Arab dead-enders.

The I/P conflict is at the root of anti-American terrorism as are the religous/monarchal characters of the Arab regimes in the middle east.

The simultanious secularization (i.e. the seperation of religion from government) of the Arab middle east coupled with the end of a racist, imperialist, Zioninst state solves the problem.

America's only interests are in the end of terrorism and the free flow of oil from the middle east. The free flow of oil benefits everyone including the Arab peoples in a secular Arab state.

We must invade Israel now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. But only conventional weapons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Course, Israel has lots of "unconventional" weapons.
Maybe we should invade them since they are in violation of a couple of hundred UN resolutions and won't disarm.

Take away their nukes and WMD and then let them fight on a level playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Did you read the article?
See pargraph 7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. How Could They Fight On A Level Playing Field
when there are two hundred million Arabs and five million Israelis.

I guess you think the Jews in occupied Europe were playing on a level playing field.

In any case, the Israeli's have 300-400 nuclear weapons, enough to take the whole Middle East with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. "In any case, the Israeli's have 300-400 nuclear weapons"
Which is why we need to invade quickly and surprise them. Immediate action is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. How do you suprise them?
You mean the way we "suprised" Iraq by building up our forces for six months in neighboring countries.

Memo To Thorstein:

Your plan in it's current form is unworkable. Go back to the drawing board and report later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. This is a rough draft
And only meant to stimulate dialogue.

I propose we invade from Iraq through nothern Turkey and Southern Syria. We have the forces stationed there.

Any nuclear strike made by Israel would be answered tenfold which would also take care of the problems that have been associated with the "holyland" for the past 3000 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. "We Have The Forces Stationed There"
You are going to take the troops in Iraq which number around 140,000 and turn them into some expeditionary force that will trespass the desert to invade Israel. Wow- you will have lines of supply that are what 500, 1000 miles.

The IDF would make mincemeat out of these lines.

I think you should refine your plan by consulting somebody who has actually conducted a military campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. We will leave the military planning up to the military planners
We will set the political goals though. And they will be achieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. This is a rough draft
And only meant to stimulate dialogue.

I propose we invade from Iraq through nothern Turkey and Southern Syria. We have the forces stationed there.

Any nuclear strike made by Israel would be answered tenfold which would also take care of the problems that have been associated with the "holyland" for the past 3000 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Where We Going To Get Our Oil For The Next Fifty Years
and where will Muslims pray when Mecca and Medina are turned into Hirsoshima and Nagasaki.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Why would Israel bomb Mecca if it is the US that is doing the invading?
Wouldn't Israel be also be contaminated in the fallout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. Under Your Scenario They Are Finished Anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
42. I Can't Even Imagine The Logistics of This Operation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. It's easy
Overwhelming force. No Quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. I Guess
I guess the fact that millions will die including many poor Americans who joined the Armed Forces cuz they couldn't get a good job or wanted to go to college is of no moment to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Peace requires sacrifice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. You forgot the part about grinding the poor children into sausages.
Or maybe just Sharon and Arafat.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Hey, I wouldn't object to a Sharon/Arafat McMuffin
Just so long as I don't have to eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sujan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
22. Who will punish the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. That is up to us.
Plus, the idea here is not punishment so much as the cessation of stupid ethnic strife that is putting the entire world at risk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. I think we should stay out of Middle-eastern affairs
Quit meddling with their cultures, quit propping up and assisting tyrants. Quit allowing oil men decide policy and lastly quit providing financial and military support for Israel, the apartheid state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Isolationism will not work
The entire world is interconnected and the entire world is effected by the ethnic strife in the middle east.

The entire world must decide to solve to problem.

Ignoring it will not make it go away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Damn ,ThorsteinVeblen
I like this more than that fuddy-duddy ol' leisure class!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. Although...
I would change it to a UN occupation rather than a US occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. The UN has not the military power to acheive a victory in Israel
But I see no problem with the UN providing the bulk of the occupying force since they are the ones who created Israel in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
41. well meaning imperialism is still imperialism, TV
The only solution is:
Enforce ALL the bleeding UNSC resolutions concerning the Middle East.
It is no magical recipe but it's the way that will cause less suffering
and death (and still there will be a lot of it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. I say it is self defense and in the interest of the entire world
Those motives aren't imperial in nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. who would believe that?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Doesn't matter who believes it and who doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. ThorsteinVeblen
A few questions:

1. Who do you mean by we?
2. In your opinion who would agree with this idea?
3. Just out of curiosity, which Democrat do you favor in '04?
4. What nationality are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Ani Yun Wiya
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 04:33 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
1.) It is the Royal "We".

2.) http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/walras/bios/veblen.html
http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~benjamin/316kfall/316ktexts/swift.html

"I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection."

3.) Howard Dean

4.) American

ps - cool name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Thank you for your answers.
I trust that what was offered in your original post, was in a spirit akin to the links you offered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Read the Veblen biography carefully
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 06:09 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
Just because The Theory of the Leisure Class is "satire" doesn't mean it didn't contain truth or was unimportant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
63. In what order?
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 06:16 PM by TheStranger
Can you number them in the chronological order in which each shall be undertaken?

This is the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Saudi Arabia first as they are the greatest threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Perhaps you can tell me why...
Saudi Arabia is the greatest threat.

And more so, why there is even among Democrats a blood lust, killing spree mood that now has that country as a target?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. All the terrorist funding from 9/11 came from the Saudi Arabian
elite including the Royal family. 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi Arabian. The offical religion of Saudi Arabia is Wahhabi fundamentalism that teaches jihad and death to Americans and Jews. Anti-Semitic propaganda including a documentary advocating the truth of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are produced by the government in order to demonize Jews and Israel. The Bin Laden's, whose money still supports Osama, are Saudi citizens and supporters of terrorism.

Until this flow of money and hatred is stopped, America is in grave peril of another terrorist attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. are you serious?
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 07:22 PM by StandWatie
If you want to play follow the money about state government funding (real state government funding, not private citizens) you wind up in Pakistan playing geopolitics with the ISI and CIA competing to fund and train these people as a proxy force against Iran's Northern Alliance.

If you are wanting to get to the bottom of this in some military way you are better off bombing Langley and Islamabad, and while I have no use for Wahabbi or Deobandi Muslims or honestly the religious of any stripe it's hypocritical as hell to single them out when radical Christian fundamentalists have one of their own sitting as leader of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. The money coming out of Saudi Arabia
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 07:35 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
"If you want to play follow the money about state government funding (real state government funding, not private citizens) you wind up in Pakistan playing geopolitics with the ISI and CIA competing to fund and train these people as a proxy force against Iran's Northern Alliance."

is akin to Reily Bechtel giving money to Kellog/Brown& Root in order to have their operatives bomb the Eifel Tower. The American Government will protect Reily Bechtel at all costs because he is a member of the American elite who rules this country. Plus it is very unlikely that Reily Bechtel would take such action without at least tacit approval from the people currently holding power in the US government. If you were France I would argue it would be justified for you to use military action in order to arrest Reily Bechtel.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. where is US and Pakistani culpability
You have drawn these stark moral lines with damnable consequenses from those you have judged and left out two main actors :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. The two main actors in what? 9/11?
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 07:45 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
As far as America, either Wolfowitz and other NeoCons were involved or not. They need to be investigated, arrested, tried and if found guilty executed.

As far as Pakistan, I am unaware of them having more culpability than either the Taliban or the Saudi elite.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
71. Aww f*@k it
Let's just nuke 'em.

Love,
Paul Wolfowitz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. sounds like something Wolfy would say
Also I wonder if Thorstein's ideal candiate, Dr. Dean would agree with this :shrug: something tells me no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC