Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's up with Karen Hughes saying "Valerie PLUME"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:53 PM
Original message
What's up with Karen Hughes saying "Valerie PLUME"
on Meet the Press?

Was she playing dumb so nobody could pin any part of the outing of Ms. Plame on her?

Then, after saying in answer to virtually every question Russert asked, "Tim, I was there . . . ." she demonstrated having taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.

Is this her effort to show us that she was always under oath and therefore, credible?

I'm sorry, but I don't buy it.

This woman is on top of everything that happens in politics, either to push it or spin it, and she darned well knows the woman's name is Valerie Plame.

Her interview today makes me think she's talking real fast and trying real hard so nobody will notice that she might have been there then, too.

Sounds like a good case of "Me no Alamo" to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. incompetent, lying half wits
did you see Ed "ScrewNose" Gillespie on MTV, referring to "Stinko de Mayo?"

swear to god.....Daily Show had it

he looked the MOST weaselly little ferret faced rathead you've EVER seen, wearing a ballcap and everything, too, just like those hepcats at RNC who groove to the mosdef sounds n'tude.

btw, can you give a recap of any specifics? I turned of MTP as soon as I heard she was on next. I'd just eaten

she REALLY gets my goat......though, I seem to have that reaction to whichEVER pugthug is onscreen at any particular time. each and everyone is ineffably, nauseatingly despicable.....beyond description.....each succeeding one is worse than his/her predecessor.

how do they do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryinoville Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How DO they do that?
These MF's are seriously repugnant/ I can't stand any of them. They get worse every time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Well, I TiVo'ed it, but
Dang, that woman talks so fast it would take days to cover everything she said!

One funny thing, though, was when she flat-out said that Bush had not opposed the creation of the 911 Commission.

Russert sort of chuckled and read two quotes, one from Cheney and one I think from Bush which totally refuted her silly lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. I forgot something she said.
She trilled that it was such a joy to have the chance to teach her son to drive while she's been in Austin.

Can you IMAGINE having that woman teach you to drive? It'd be enough to wed you to public transportation for the rest of your life!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh No! She said "Valerie Plame" for a very good reason
at least to them. I immediately thought she was distancing Bush from it for some reason. My next thought was that indictments may come down this week.

In any event, it was an attempt to immunize Bush from something Plame related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. I wondered about her reason also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm convinced Karen R is back because Karl R is going.
And it's probably all right with her family. Isn't that nice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Seems like I read somewhere that her son
is going off to college this year, so that would leave her a little freer to be away from home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. she is Orwellian
she brought up Plame out of the blue, citing his supposed concern about the leak as evidence of I don't know what, when in reality he was likely involved in it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. She also said that she had worked with the people to make the banner
on the aircraft carrier that Bush appeared on to declare "victory". I thought that the administration had disavowed any involvement in that.

You know the old saying "If you don't lie, you don't have to remember what you said". I think she's talking too fast to catch herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Karen Haghes said that? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bandy Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. She sure did...
I heard it too! At the time, I could not imagine why she would admit that after * tried to separate himself from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a page out of the .."Mr. Lay?, um I think I met him once,
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 04:28 PM by SoCalDem
when he was campaigning for my opponent".. playbook..

distance.. that's all it is.. feigned ignorance/innocence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's worse than Rove
because she's insidious.

You look at Rove and you know he's an asshole. She's comes off, down-homey, I'm just an innocent nice woman and mother and you can believe me--smile. That's why she's more dangerous than Rove could ever be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. I noticed that too...
..."Plume".

And I agree with others, it's her sly way of distancing her and the rest of the White House cabal from the incident, as in "see, we don't really know who she is, can't even get her name right."

Scoundrels, every one of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. She thought it was sly, but I thought it was clumsy as hell!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1971 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. "Plume" was no flub... she's gotta know the name....
... so her strategy has to be to feign innocence whenever possible, however possible. And in doing so, show contempt for those who would criticize her precious President and the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Mispronouncing someone's name intentionally is like
giving them a nickname without permission. (Remind you of anybody?)

It is very demeaning and condescending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. The fact that Hughes, not Russert, brought up the Plame case was odd.
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 04:52 PM by The Night Owl
Did anyone else find the fact that Hughes brought up the Plame case without prompting from Russert kind of odd?

Perhaps Hughes is expecting some of her comrades to be indicted in the Plame case and is talking about it so as to control the story before it gets out there. In other words, I think Hughes may have inadvertently tipped us that a big shakedown is coming.

Holy Hell... That would be a riot to see Bush honchos in handcuffs. A major arrest in the Bush White House would make Bush's reelection prospects incredibly uncertain. Of course, Smirk will probably opt for reselection, not reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. what the hell was Russert's response?
did he drop it, just like he does ANY serious questioning of ANY member of the junta?

daily howler is by far the best source on Russert's fatuity/venality.

check his column back during the selection, during which he highlights Russert bringing up, and allowing Bush to DWELL on the whole Gore/alpha male consultant scene, which was UNTRUE to begin with!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Russert said nothing of the Plame case. Link to MTP transcript here...
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 05:31 PM by The Night Owl
Today's MTP transcript can be found here...

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4663767

The following is an excerpt from a transcript of NBC's Meet The Press...

...

MS. HUGHES: Well, Tim, I'm not sure that I characterize it that way, because what I've heard the president say is he wants all the facts to come out, he wants the commission to be able to report fully to the American people. After all, he and his national security team are responsible for preventing another attack. But I've been in the White House and I've seen the competing pressures there. There are a lot of factors at work when you're the president of the United States. He has to worry about protecting the lives of the confidential informants that we're relying on, sources and methods and human intelligence workers who are out there around the world. You know the consternation that was created when the name of Valerie Plume was leaked as being a CIA operative. Rightly so. That was wrong, that someone leaked her name and jeopardized her career. But the president has to worry about protecting those intelligence methods and sources.

The president also has to worry about important constitutional principles. I remember being there in the East Room of the White House and holding up my hand and taking that oath to defend the Constitution, which calls for a separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. I'm very glad and I know the president is glad and so is Dr. Rice that they were able to find a way to balance that important principle of the Constitution with letting her testify in public under oath, because I think it's important for the American people to hear the facts. And actually, the debate about this has obscured the fact that the White House has given an unprecedented level of cooperation to this investigation.

MR. RUSSERT: But now in hindsight the president believes the commission's a good idea.

...

Note that NBC quotes Hughes as saying "Plume" instead of "Plame".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's Hilarious (Run-on Sentences)
NBC's transcriber did her a huge favor by breaking up her delivery into sentences.

I thought I caught maybe three in the first paragraph, but it's hard to tell.

She for darned sure didn't take a breath during that paragraph, unless there was one after "Plume".

BTW, in her machine-gun delivery, she came down heavy on "Plume" with a huge emphasis.

If it were notated as music, everything else would have been eighth notes, and that one word would have been a half or whole note
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. BCG!
This was GOOD!

"he looked the MOST weaselly little ferret faced rathead you've EVER seen, wearing a ballcap and everything, too, just like those hepcats at RNC who groove to the mosdef sounds n'tude."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. why, thank you!
ol' ScrewNose is way up there in the firmament of scumkings

and that's saying an awful lot

I love the way he can't EVER talk at a normal pace.

and he had the HUGEST, WIDEST, most exaggerated grin on his face, talking to that MTV guy

priceless

glad I have that on tape!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. So, then - is she the leaker?
She was gone from the WH by that time. Then they could easily say that it was noone in the WH who leaked Plame's identity to Novakula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. She's certainly a White House operative
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 07:39 PM by janeaustin
whether she's on the payroll there or is an independent contractor.

I imagine she could have been, but I sure don't remember anything to suggest she is.

(edited for careless typing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. The most telling part of that interview to me was...
When Russert asked her what she would do after the election and her response was something like..I'm outa there...I'm going back to Texas.

Made me think, if i was a shrub supporter, even she's jumping ship! Lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Trying to make it sound like a silly, inconsequential thing.
Stupid partisan politics, no doubt. Not a federal crime by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Kick!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. She talks fast, that's the whole reason she's back
well that and she puts a downhome folksy show on the whole slimy mess.

I watched her this am until I couldn't stomach both her AND my yummy banana pancakes.

Can't you just SEE the meeting that went down in the White House a while back when they said "GET KAREN BACK!!!!"

The picture of them mopping the sweat off their brows just makes me smile and even giggle a bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC