|
two tales of texas mothers, murdering all of their children because god told them to, one is sent to life in prison, while the other, just yesterday, is found not guilty, by reason of insanity. why the disparity?
one could argue that both women are insane, pointing out that only a madwoman could drown or crush the heads of her own sons in a sudden frenzy. both women held deeply religious views apparently, but most mothers don't do what they did. without getting into why anyone would kill their kids in this way, just because voices, or god told them to, how could one texas jury declare one mother guilty and another jury not, of the same crime, with the same motivation?
why is one murdering mother deemed insane, and the other not? these cases have popped up all through history, and sometimes the murderer will insist that it was satan who compelled them to commit murder, not god. so who is crazier, mothers killing on orders from god, or from satan?
and why does god ask people to kill anyway? couldn't he 'theoretically' kill anyone he wanted, without asking for someone to do it? i don't get it. but apparently, god does occasionally impose upon someone to do some smiting, whether it be the neighboring non-believers, or your own children, as in Abraham's case.
and while i'm at it, this mom who got off o.j. free yesterday, she said that god asked her to kill her children as a proof of her faith, as in the tale of Abraham and his offering of his own son to god. so now, after she's killed the kids, and proven beyond all doubt how faithful she is, why is she being sent to prison? is this her reward for making the ultimate sacrifice of faith? or perhaps, she sees the reward as coming after her death, in the great beyond. it's a real mindblower, any way you look at it.
|