Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Kerry loses in November, is Hillary the democrats savior for 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:28 PM
Original message
If Kerry loses in November, is Hillary the democrats savior for 2008?
Will anyone else be able to compete against her for the nomination?

And please, let's have an honest discussion and not the hyperbole that the country will end and elections will be cancelled. They weren't cancelled after Nixon and Reagan won 49 state landslides. Life will suck. But life will go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. God, I hope not
I'm NOT one of her fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. If Kerry loses, there will not be elections in 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You hit the nail right on the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this question is a downer
When my daughters played sports, they had a really good coach who focused on the positive. He didn't put up with negative thoughts.

I think we Dems should focus ont he positive, especially since the LA poll showed Kerry ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly
Not only does this question suppose that we lose in 04 but that the entire primary season comes down to Hilary. Seems a little restrictive to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. If bush gets elected I don't think..............................
anyone can save america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why the doom and gloom posts about losing in November?
I think it's an UTTER waste of energy to contemplate losing.

Why would ANYONE accept the promotion of a "loser" mindset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Contingency Planning
teaches you to always evaluate every possible scenario so you will be always be prepared for whatever outcome may arise.

The election will be 50/50. We have to assume we may not win. I'm a realist. I don't look at life through rose-colored glasses. It prevents disappointment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's not a winning mindset.
Not with democracy itself at stake in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Very disingenous
I find the argument "We need to get ready for 2008" to be very disingenous. I have strong doubts about your supposed belief that we need to start preparing for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I might add
That looking for a savior in anything is the wrong way to look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. A thousand times 'NO!'
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Enough with the negative waves, Moriarty!
Why do you even bring this up? We're still a long way from the '04 election. Hillary is the obvious frontrunner, given your hypothetical. But, four years is a lifetime in politics and Edwards or someone else could rise dramatically in that time.

BTW, Hillary would make a great president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. on principle
I try to respond to every Hillary thread with this comment.
We don't like a hereditary Bush presidency, so why would a "hereditary" Clinton presidency be any better?
There seem to be monarchists on both sides.

I've got nothing against Hillary. She's my Senator in New York.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. GREAT COMMENT. I like Hillary too, but
I have acquired a new understanding of the feelings the right must have had about Bill Clinton, because I have the same feelings about GB. You are absolutely right....we hate the idea of this hereditary presidency and I can understand a lot of people not wanting the same with Clinton.

She seems to be doing a very good job as Senator and if she decides to change jobs, there are a lot of positions in an administration where she would be great as well.........wether that be 2004 or 2008...or both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. This Thread Is The Antithesis To Confident Expectation
which is a necessity to win in November.

There are no saviors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. There was one savior...
But the people didn't want him in the Primaries! Kind of Like Jesus some 2000 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. good question
even though I know a lot of people don't want to talk about it I think it's a good idea to cover all possibilities. It would be interesting to see. Personally I don't know much about Hillary so I'd have to see. It would also depend on who she's running against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hilary will never be president.
She inspires too many people too hate and not enough people to love her. Nominating her would build in a "base advantage" to whomever the Republicans nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. What a Fair Und Balanced Question, ringmastery!
Truly fantastic. Brings so much to the debate.

I want to personally thank you for asking such a Fair Und Balanced Question and a VERY improtant question, too.

Are you familiar with Al Franken's book. It's Called
Lies and the Lying laris who tell them

Yes, it's called

Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

If you haven't read it yet I think you should. I think you would REALLY enjoy every page-turning word.

Don't you think so?

So tell me have you read Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them?

What was your favorite part?

Did you get the part about Hillary running from the part in Al's book where he talks about the Democrats tanking this election so that Hillary can run in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I loved the question too
I just love it when we pretend that 2008 is a concern for many of us, and use our defeat in 2004 to justify the "discussion"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. What makes you certain about the "us" part?
(not referring to you & I or you & anyone or me & anyone, if you get my drift)

Let's just say I've been pondering that question as regards this thread and "Fair Und Balanced" posts like it, dig?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Actually, it was the "we" that may have been questionable
if you get MY drift :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. What makes you think there will be a 2008 election
if Busholini is "re"-elected? at least a free and fair honest real election as opposed a fixed one. Imagine what another 4 years of these assholes in power with the corporate media spewing their propaganda daily? They want nothing more than to flood all three branches of government with far-right religious whackos that we'll be lucky if we don't need a permission slip from an approved Minister to be allowed to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. After 4 more years of $hrub

I bet I could run my dog against the repug candidate and the whole nation would crawl over broken glass just to vote for the dog. In that scenario,I don't think it matters who we nominate. If this country hasn't had enough by this November,it will DAMN sure have had way more than it's belly full by '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good grief
Are you having fun bumming everyone out? Stop the negativity and do something positive for the cause.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Seems like only Republicans think Hillary wants to run.
Why the focus on her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toot Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. No!
I'm a woman, but I'm also a realist, and I don't see the American public voting a woman as President anytime soon. I would for a woman candidate if I believed in her, but I just don't see her winning.

Plus, Hillary has too much baggage, even if it's undeserved and unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. actually,this is a great tactic to bring in the loony voters
you can vote for kerry in 2004,or hillary has 2008 in the bag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Ringmaster, a poem
Oh Ringmaster Stealth
Stealthy Ringmaster
All three Rings Circus-like
amused you
amuses you
round and round the Stealth goes

In and out
Up and down
Serious discussion, down below!
Nonsensical Nonsense "Front and Center"!

Let them sink
Let them sink
doing the dirty work of Empire isn't easy

But it is profitable
and fun
but only if
your are ringmaster.
====================================================

Thank you very much. Elvis has left the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Won't matter...
Georgie will either be kicked out in November or impeached shortly thereafter. The kingdom is crumbling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nixon nor Reagan either one staged coups.
If you haven't figured out yet that the situation we are in is unprecedented in US history, you need to take a longer look at what's going on. If Bush remains in the WH for another term - regardless of how he secures that term - we won't have another free and fair election in our lifetimes. At least, not without a bloody, bloody civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC