Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new Bush budget passed by the House has some very harmful cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 02:11 PM
Original message
The new Bush budget passed by the House has some very harmful cuts
This budget provides $1.3 billion less than what the Veterans' Affairs Committee recommended - on a bipartisan basis - for vital veterans' health care programs.

This budget cuts appropriations for environmental protection by $1.5 billion below last year's already low level, and keeps funding below the 2004 enacted level for every year in the budget.

This pathetic budget cuts Homeland Security funding by $857 million below the President's request for 2005-2009, applying the cut to all homeland security activities OUTSIDE of the Department of Defense...things like harbor security, chemical plant, and nuclear plant protection.

This budget underfunds education. It provides $8.8 billion below the authorized level for No Child Left Behind programs.

This budget fails to protect Social Security, spending the entire $1 trillion Social Security surplus from 2005 to 2009, despite repeated promises not to spend a penny of it. Ask yourself what the point of this spending is. Three reasons: first, it will allow the Bush Administration to buy more weaponry for the Iraq war, rewarding George H. W. Bush's company, the Carlyle Group; second, it will give Vice President, Dick Cheney's company, Halliburton, a chance to bring in some more bacon before they scamper out of Iraq with their tails between their legs; third, it offers the Bush Administration the opportunity to not raise taxes because they are stealing from the piggy bank instead.

There are presently 28 states working on anti-outsourcing legislation but nothing is happening in Washington.

These details were extracted from this article
http://www.greenbaynewschron.com/page.html?article=125049
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. But those millionaires will get to keep their $112,000 tax cut.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC