When confronted with a question that may incriminate her and her cohorts, do you think she will say she cannot answer that because it contains highly sensitive information, just to get out of answering the question?
2. Yes, and it will sound so vague and general and similar to the rest of
her testimony, the Repukes will all say with great satisfaction, "There, we told you nothing was wrong. Clarke's a liar!" And the rest of us will say how the hell did we let this happen.
4. Because 9/11 HAPPENED ..... she will have a most difficult time of it.
What can she possibly say? That they knew it was coming? That they took all the neccessary precautions?
Did they implement the findings/recommendations of Rudman/Hart? Who was in charge? Of the National Security? What can she say and still look good? Like they closed the door after the horses left the barn?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.