Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

constant, repeated RW talk show defense of Bush vs Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:27 AM
Original message
constant, repeated RW talk show defense of Bush vs Clarke
Bush was in office 8 months; Clinton 8 years

how can 'we' blame Bush for anything about 9-11???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Drives me crazy.
I can't even think of a good analogy, but it's totally ridiculous. Clinton went after Al Qaeda, but 'not enough', so Bush ignoring them is obviously ok? WTF. Gah!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. cause clinton had experience and knowledge
and bush didnt. and bush refused the information. that is how we can make him responsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. can't argue about the numbers...
they're accurate...(Bush actually 7 months 3 weeks)...have to discuss actions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. You sure CAN argue those numbers.
Clinton was in office for 8 years, sure, but Osama Bin Laden didn't emerge as a threat to us until midway through his second term. 8 years my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. here's an analogy
Suppose you are a night nurse in a hospital. One of your patients has a grave crisis near the end of the shift and is in danger of dying unless she is carefully monitored and all means are used to treat her. Your shift is over at 7, and the day nurse comes on. You tell her vehemently and repeatedly that Mrs. Miller is in serious trouble and she will spend most of her time caring for that patient. The Day nurse smiles, says sure, sure, and then goes off to spend the day in Rich Mr. Moneybags' private room, spoonfeeding him caviar and giving him a sponge bath. Early in the day shift, while the day nurse is devoted to the other patient, Mrs. Miller's condition worsens, alarms go off and they are ignored, and finally Mrs. Miller dies.

The head nurse walks into the unit to investigate and finds the guilty nurse in Moneybags' room, giving him a blowjob.

Day nurse says "It's the night nurses fault!"

Who do you fire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Buck stops on Democrats
We do everything bad and Rethugs get all the credit (or they try to steal it when good and deflect credit when bad).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. first WTC attack
The first attack on the WTC occurred a month after Clinton took office, yet Clinton got full blame for that and Somalia... which he also inherited. I don't remember him passing the buck to everybody else like the the Bush Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. 38 days
cLinton was in office 38 days when the first WTC attack occured. can't bLame bush1 for that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. ok, it was more than a month
So, definitely Clinton's fault, just like the Bay of Pigs, Vietnam, Pearl Harbor, etc. Heck, Clinton probably tricked the Bush family into arming the Nazis in WW2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. weLL
i bLame cLinton for my seasonaL aLLergies. i aLso bLame him for the rise in chiLdhood obesity. has the man no shame!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. If Clinton had been in office 8 years and 8 months
9/11 would not have occurred. How's that? The Clinton team stopped the millenium attack by not being asleep at the wheel. Bush is to blame for 9-11 because his plan was to follow the orders of the cheney energy task force which was to take the iraqi oil fields and secure no-bid contracts for halliburton - MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. 9-11 was the catalyst bush needed.

CLINTON DIDN'T NEED 9-11 TO HAPPEN BECAUSE HE WAS UNDER ON OBLIGATION TO THE CHENEY TASK FORCE. Now if dick wants to disprove this he can open up the books - NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. During Clinton's 8 years he was able to catch the
bombers of the WTC and throw them in jail. He was able to stop attacks on the millennium. He had a strategy developed that was working and had OBL in the headlights.
We all know what happened when he passed the baton. The new guy ran in a different direction.
The evidence bubbling up out of the CIA and FBI regarding information that never got to the appropriate desks is the place to put our national attention.
Was there an attempt to hinder Clinton's strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. After WTC 1, the only successful Terrorist attacks on American Soil
were home-grown.

Oklahoma City - Tim McVeigh & Terry Nichols - militiamen.

Atlanta 1996 Olympic games - only real suspect was cleared; no other real leads

Hey, didn't Clinton's anti-terrorism task force catch the Unabomber?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Remind them that they are the adults, right?
Adults know what to do.

If they aren't the adults, then they are whining children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. doesn't matter
if someone brought this up, I'd quickly point out that it still boils down to Bush lies to invade Iraq, and invading Iraq (for the oil whatever) played into AQ's hands. As Clarke pointed out, we had the support of moderate Islam, etc. against extremists, but we've only succeeding in uniting them with our invasion of Iraq.

Not to mention the "wag the dog" that was brought up when Clinton took action...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Constant, repeated Nazi Press on offense against Jews
Same thing.

This is remarkable? It couldn;t be more predictable than a nice, rosy 1978 Soviet Agriculture Report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here's a good way to use their analogy:
I drove my car on a trip for eight hours. You took over the wheel and drove the car off the road and wrecked it after eight minutes. Now your saying its MY fault?

Typical slimebag RWers, who are down to stupid silly justifications for the failures of the Chimp.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. won't work...weak analogy...
they can say you let maint. go for 8 hours...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. "Well, if you felt that way..."
"Why didn't you fix the car, before you started driving it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Actually
"maintenance" was not the problem. You fell asleep at the wheel.

:-)

Nevermind. Arguing with dittoheads (not you, I mean the RWers) is a lost cause anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. If Clinton stayed in the driver's seat, 9-11 would not have happened.
Excellent analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I happen to agree with you on that
Clinton was from all accounts focused on terrorism and stopped a lot of it.

If he had been in office and pushing on the FBI and CIA they would have found the pilots who only wanted to fly and not land guys and I think this thing would have been busted up before it could have happened.

Smirk is such an arrogant and incompetent and lazy fool, he couldn't be bothered.

And don't get me started on Rice. She is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torgo4 Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why Don't They Ask...
WHAT could Clinton have done from Jan 20 - Sep 11th 2001?

Nothing except warning the bumbling dolts because.....

He was NO LONGER President!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. That's right, and for those 8 years...
... the world trade center did NOT get destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. Been three years and bush* is still not responsible for anything.
Can't wait to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. In 8 years 37 Americans killed by terrorism
in 8 months 3000 Americans killed by terrorism .

that is my response , I hope it's short enough for
a sound bite .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. "The long national nightmare of peace and prosperity
is finally at an end!!"


That one always pisses them off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. amazing how prophetic that Onion was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. Even before the election outcome was decided...
... by the Supreme Court, I remember the Bush team insisting on getting started with the briefings and going over reports and materials, etc. in November and especially December of 1999. I recall thinking that it was particularly tasteless at the time... almost as if they couldn't wait to smash everything that President Clinton had stood for.

Now they're complaining that they had too little time to get up to speed? They must all be very s-l-o-w learners!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes and eight years no terror attacks on US soil
Along comes Bush* and in only eight months a terror attack is allowed to happen. Easy to contrast the two. We were safe under Clinton and in extreme danger under Bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC