Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If The White House Had Clarke's Manuscript For Over 3 Months...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:00 PM
Original message
If The White House Had Clarke's Manuscript For Over 3 Months...
for approval before release...

Is all this self-righteous indignation we are witnessing from the right, a stage managed event???

Certainly seems as if they had enough time to plan out their defense and counterattacks!!!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Has Crossed My Mind, Too.
The 9/11 Commission is sandbagged with folks prepared to give Bush and crowd a pass for allowing 3,000 people to be murdered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right! They studied this book for three months!
Also, I wonder what the WH censored from it? Clarke must know reams more than he's telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pakistan pulled the rug out from under them...
Al Zawahiri was supposed to be rounded up last weekend to counter the upcoming revelations of the 9/11 commission. Oooopsie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldebaran Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Eureka!!
Edited on Fri Mar-26-04 06:15 PM by aldebaran
I'd been wondering about their ineptitude on the reply, until I read your post. They had a distraction planned until Musharraf screwed them!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good Call You Guys !!! --- I'm Likin It !!! - And Welcome To The DU !!!
:bounce::toast::toast::bounce:

Pleasure to make your acquaintance.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. You are on to something -- and welcome to DU!
I had wondered what that whole thing was all about. . .THANKS for making it oh so very very clear.

Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. May I point out a little fact
That assumes somebody READ it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not * though.
Unless someone read it aloud to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waywest Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, we know the chimp doesn't read...
And he hasn't been to any elementary school photo ops for the kids to read it to him.
I'd say it just slipped everybody's mind. All so thorough, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe WH was to sure of them selfs?
Figured it would go like the other guys book. O'Neil(Name?)The one that lost his job. That was over fast. What do you think this backing the GOP convention up to 911 will do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. They thought they could hold onto it until the commission concluded.
Remember, it was just a few weeks ago that the administration agreed to extend the committee's time. They were pressured to do so. The admin probably could have held onto it until May, but they couldn't hold onto it for three months beyond that.

They screwed themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. everything they do is staged
but, this time they had lots of time to get the script straight. and they can't seem to get it together. I think they are running out of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. The question is: did they suborn perjury?
After all, if they had the manuscript, had the other document that supposedly impeaches the info in the manuscript (ie: the perjury red herring) and yet didn't bother to inform Clarke that he would be perjuring himself by speaking mendaciously, then they pretty much ALLOWED him to perjury himself. That's equivalent to a police officer allowing a witness to give testimony that the officer knows is false.

Am I right here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I Dunno, But I Sure Like The Way You Think !!! --- Calling All Lawyers !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Last Kick From Me !!!
:cry::kick:

LOL!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC