Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many Iraq-Bound GIs Buy Own Armor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:32 AM
Original message
Many Iraq-Bound GIs Buy Own Armor
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/26/iraq/main608789.shtml?cmp=EM8705
Soldiers headed for Iraq are still buying their own body armor - and in many cases, their families are buying it for them...

towards the end of the article it mentions:

A bill being considered in Congress would reimburse families who bought body armor before the Army asked for increased production to bridge the gap between soldiers who had armor and those that did not.

But of course whoever this AP writer is fails to mention that the bill is sponsored by Kerry. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. So whats new, the white house makes jokes at the dead soldiers
expense. We bought Mike many things and made sure he gets food and comforts he wouldnt otherwise have.
No way will we let him suffer any more then he has over there.
Its just what you have to do, to make sure they are safe. someone on here suggested a Cooling packet for his vest and helmet. we sent it.
Heck ya, we did.
theres no way we will let him stand there in 120 degree heat with an 80 pound vest.
The military doesnt care, they dont give a rats ass that he has scoliosis of the spine (which they diagnosed and lost his X rays for), or that they are sending guys over with maximum physical and psychological ailments.
Thats why there will be a draft. Believe me.
The military is stretched so thin its beyond belief. Families are in an uproar about it, Im not the only one.
welcome to fascist USA, where the neocons are starting their wars and throwing all our kids into them, and the wealthy bastards stay home and make jokes about our dead soldiers at black tie dinners while the military families pay for equipment .
http://www.mfso.org
http://www.bringthemhomenow.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. but but I thought W bought $87 Billion worth of armor
hmm maybe I was misinformed by those ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. so...
who's not supporting the troops now...???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Apparently not Rumsfeld either
The preview on ABC WNT also featured Marine Lt.Gen Greg Newbold saying that Rummy and his staff hyped prewar intelligence and that everything he saw (raw intel.)painted Saddam as a "paper tiger" but I can't find that quote anywhere.


http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Primetime/World/donald_rumsfeld_040325-1.html

John White, who was Secretary of the Army at that time, said Rumsfeld micromanaged what the military calls deployment: determining exactly which troops would go and exactly when they would leave.

He charges Rumsfeld's interference caused troops to arrive in Iraq without equipment, and crucial support units to be weeks late in getting there. "I would argue he was not part of the cure. He was part of the problem," White said.

"We didn't have enough troops, enough boots on the ground, to stop the looting, to stop the wholesale destruction of the infrastructure of the country that we're now asking the American taxpayers to pay for," said White.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't it Ollie North's company that's
profiteering on this?

Seems I remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC