Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even The Raw Story is bashing Richard Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:12 AM
Original message
Even The Raw Story is bashing Richard Clarke
liberal alternative to Drudge? I guess if you're liberal then no Republican is safe from slander. They don't refute his wickedly awesome testimony but they make him look like some power-hungry bureaucrat with outrageous ideas to combat cyberterrorism. Apparently if people aren't directly killed, then its not a worthy cause. Nevermind all the people who will be killed indirectly from the damage to our Defense department or all the trillions of tax dollars that could be lost.

http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/koch/clarke.htm

some excerpts:
" Clarke is also a fierce political infighter. Anyone who survives in White Houses under Reagan, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II — becoming more powerful with each administration — is a bureaucrat who knows how to serve his own political and personal interests. (This is a guy who stuffed a .357 into his belt as he strode back in the White House after 9/11 — to what end, shoot it out with Condi? give his crotch greater heft?)

Clarke is also responsible for coining the doom-laden phase "Cyber Pearl Harbor," a hobgoblin cyberterrorism threat as realistic as the 1983 computer-cum-nuclear doomsday film War Games.

Alert to Clarke (now ensconced in the comfortable groves of academe at Harvard, counting his royalties) — Hey Richard, name one person who died from cyberterrorism?

It was also Clarke who initially (and eventually successfully) sought to weaken the Freedom of Information Act as it relates to corporations. Thanks to the Department of Homeland's enabling legislation, John Ashcroft's dark propensities and Clarke's hype-vocabulary, it's going to be tougher to chase corporate do-badders via their records.

The next time one tries to chase corporate corruption, Haliburton, for example, you'll get a response, something to the effect that "No, you can't have that information because of our cooperation with Homeland Security." Kinda makes Dick Cheney feel all warm and cosy all over.

It also makes one kinda want to tell Clarke where to shove his .357."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
because its my thread damn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC