Should Presidents Bush and Clinton testify publicly? msnbc poll

[jbfam4]

The 9/11 hearings: Should Presidents Bush and Clinton testify publicly? * 2474 responses

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/
Yes
63%

No
37%

[derby378]

1. Absolutely...

...but Bush will never let Condi testify.

Of course, Sandy Berger (Clinton's version of Rice) did it all the time...

[RobertSeattle]

2. More accurate question

Should Clinton and Bush testify publicly, meaning that in contrast, Clinton would make Bush look like the incompetent failure he is, and cause a massive landslide for Kerry in the 2004 election?

:evilgrin:

[SammyWinstonJack]

7. Was going to ask the very stupid question as to why

bush* won't publicly testify, aside from having something to hide that is. I think the contrast between Clinton and bush* would indeed do bush's* image great harm. Would love to watch the bush* puppy press try to spin that.

[IrateCitizen]

3. Last I checked, they were supposed to serve US...

... not the other way around.

But such views are antiquated and idealistic, so they usually aren't taken seriously. :argh:

[Imalittleteapot]

4. I would like to hear the reasoning behind the "no"

answers.

[corporatewhore]

5. AFLAC!!!

[Zardeenah]

6. Teehee

Isn't it great that there is at least one accurate, unbiased news source. ;)

Susan

[ConcernedCanuk]

8. the Yes's gained one percent - keep it up!

.
.
.

The 9/11 hearings: Should Presidents Bush and Clinton testify publicly?

* 3263 responses

Yes
64%

No
36%