Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9.11 investigation - thread 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:41 AM
Original message
9.11 investigation - thread 2
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:04 AM by robbedvoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. tenet mispronounced "enemies"
hehehe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clarke question - entrenched culture against covert operations,
assasination - do you share this opinion? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is Clarke right that 2 senior members resigned? "No. Dunno"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. More staff members will read parts of Natl policy coordination
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 10:49 AM by robbedvoter
Pacifica has comentary - Gail Sheedy
want to isolate themselves from the years when they were training the muhajedin - before the 90s.
gail Sheedy is saying - they contradicted themselves - when asked - why didn't you keep them under observation? Thenet said: we just finished with the Russians and went home.

Sandy Berger will follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. official thread 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. WOW, george tenet says
"uh, uh, umm, er, uh, umm"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonFiyah Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. What is he?
Is he Repub or Dem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. forgive me for what may sound like a wisearss answer, but
what tenet is is 'beholden to bush' for his job, and he's covering his arss! that's a really good question, bonfiyah, and sorry to say i'm not sure. he was, you may already know, cia director under clinton, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonFiyah Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. So what can be assumed
Is that he is just doing what he feels is necessary in order to keep his job. So he is nothing more than the village idiot, a damn lackey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. he's a bureaucrat
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Was Condi in the loop, or not?
Tenet looked like a fish with a hook in his mouth when one of the Senators pulled out a letter stating that the CIA instigated the report which Condi (or everyone that speaks for Condi) uses as proof that she was involved in the process.

Does anybody have any observations on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. What time does Clarke come on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. 1:30 EST n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think he is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks ewagner and Vadem
Appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. After the break, afternoon. Sandy berger after the stuff reading nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. what was the disruption earlier?
(please don't ask me to wait for a million posts to download...I'm on dialup.)

I couldn't understand what they guy was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. None of us could understand what he was saying....
We'll hear about it later on CNN, etc., probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. A lesson to be learned from this
If you're going to disrupt, make sure you're near a microphone.

He was certainly whisked out quickly.

But he did disrupt when Tenet was speaking, for whatever that's worth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Marcus' voice keeps cracking...
sounds like he's 14... =\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I keep thinking he sounds like Mr. Haney
You know, from Green Acres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lots of Clarke praising now - I think it's Sandy berger written statement
being read colorlessly by some staffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Its the commission staff report I think
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupwithbush Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. What is a watch fax?
Clinton and them got it 5 or 6 days a week. Sounds like another Condisleezza cancellation? Too busy planning for Iraq?

Tennet got told he would be questioned later about the discrepancy(isn't that like lying when he's under oath) about the origin of who ordered the pdb for September 6th?

And last night Mathews made a comment about Tenet(? or do I have the person wrong? at breakfast on Sept. 11 and the remark he made when he heard about the planes flying into the WTC about the guys in Florida wanting to fly planes? Do you think Tenet has been asked about that remark?

I'm amazed at all the undertones in this. You can almost see the wheels turning about what they should and shouldn't say. And Kerry can go fly a kite as well as the two repubs. You can just hear the Bush bootlicking going on.

Last, I wish everyone would be told by all the news media that Clarke already testified 21 hours! in private. Wow, maybe we'll read what he said in our lifetime, but probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes, it was Tenet that Chris Matthews was speaking about...
and no, Tenet hasn't been asked about that quote, at least in the hearings.

Wow, I didn't realize that "Clarke already testified 21 hours!"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Hey guys, I just got here (it's only 8:13 in Ca.)
why isn't this on cspan? I'm listening to it on Pacificia. Wasn't it on cspan yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Why are they trying to hurry this hearing along?
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:17 AM by 0007
I noticed Kean was prodding a few of the commissioners and now the reader is skipping material to bring the hearing up to speed. WTF!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. The opening statements are supposed to be a certain time length
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. Watch Cspan 3 live Streaming Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Im listening on CSPAN3 pretty explosive stuff
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:22 AM by Jim4Wes
Clarke had written to Condi before the August meeting of principles. He lambasted the Bushies from several fronts. Talked about military inaction after Cole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. In February 2001, Bush "cancelled" most of Clinton's policies
and planned to put his own into effect, but "never got around to it"..

This whole investigation is getting a bit ridiculous, really.There are two things going on here..

1.Assess blame
2.Find out WHY it happened.

The Bush team had access to daily briefings before January..They actually started in December, after the SCOTUS decision. They cannot claim that they did not know what was going on..

In July of 2001, Condi was blithely going on "speaking engagements"..I have one on tape.. Not much at all was even mentioned about terrorism..but she DID use the term WMD..(Iraq was on the table then)....

Bush never indicated ANY sense of impending danger.. Reviewing filmed footage of the "vacation" in Crawford during the whole MONTH of vacation, shows brush clearing, joshing with reporters, and mundane things like that.. If the nation were in danger, WHY were we not told?? That was not CLINTON's responsibility in AUG 2001..

I really wish that Clinton would just show up at the hearings and say..

"This is BULLSHIT.. These phony-ass weasels are trying to blame ME, for stuff that THEY are responsible for....They were LAZY, DUMB, and only wanted war with Iraq,,and they screwed up... "


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. 'Tis quite obvious isn't it, that Bush had access to the knowledge
before 911?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. Sandy Berger giving his statement, now... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonFiyah Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
33. Is it the Job of the commission
to examine why it is NORAD was completely incompetent on 9/11/01.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. Damn Berger knows what he is talking about
10 ACCOMPLISHMENTS and 3 recommendations.

Oh for the days the adults were in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Ben-Veniste is documenting times Berger testified as NSA advisor
NONE of those appearances were as important as these hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. He sure laid it out very succinctly--only 67 people lost their
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:36 AM by Vadem
lives to terrorism under the Clinton Admin. so they were doing something right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I thought Berger
was very well spoken in his opening statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. Counter terrorism budget went up 350% under Clinton
sighted by Freeh when he left in '01.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. How can anyone
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:45 AM by Jim4Wes
compare Clinton and Bush's record and think Bush was on the job pre 9/11? Preposterous, Outrageous, (insert other).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Talking about how they developed predator and used it to....
double check sources on the ground. Mention that as we have watched this war we have seen how unreliable the tribal information can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
41. How's your dinner, oh by the way missiles are flying, heh
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:52 AM by Jim4Wes
US warning Pakistan that cruise missiles launched at Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
43. "Bouncing the rubble..." Ben-Veniste is obsessed with Rumsfeld's quote
this happened a few minutes ago...but Richard Ben-V repeats Rumsfeld's phrase whenever he can.

Rumsfeld said that bombing Afghanistan amounted to "bombing the rubble..."

Berger said right after that in bombing Afghanistan they were "bouncing bin Ladin into rubble."

Berger also said the Pakistan military was the midwife of the Taliban. He's got a joking tone to his voice at times but really nails the issue if pressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. has sandy been able to testify about the shelving of their recomendations
by chimpy. Also wtf happened with the Hart Rudman report that they handed off to cheney, have they even testified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Berger wasn't there, Clarke and Armitage will get asked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I've heard nothing so far about the shelving of Clinton's recommendations
I would hope we do, perhaps Clarke will bring it up this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
47. wtf? Why the hell is the Lehman shithead...
getting so much time to badger Berger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Berger can handle him, let him ask whatever crud he wants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Yeah, I don't hear Thomas Kean, saying "let move along"
Burger is giving it back to this asshole Lehman.

Kean is now saying their was a disconnect between the Clinton Admin and intel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. yeah right...
that is why they thrwarted so many potential attacks... Kean is so transparent.. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Kean did show his bias with Burger
So now it will be transparent which way this will go.

It will be Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. I knew i should not have gotten my hopes up...
it will be a whitewash for sure with the tv bobbleheads cheering it on... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. I don't know but Berger is doing fine.
said couldn't go to the world and say I am going to war on Afghanistan based on preliminary judgment or in all honesty Dick Clarkes opinion. Needed CIA final judgment didn't happen on my watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. I was thinking the same thing--when Kean cuts Ben-Veniste off..
after about 5 minutes. You can tell that the PNACers are running this Commission!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. talking about condi liar now....
sandy says he conveyed the sense of urgency about Al qaida. Said it was most important issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. Berger is taking no crap from this panel member!
Go Sandy! I hope they move on to another panel member real soon, this guy is an asshole, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. Telling about Condi briefings...several, "terrorism will be your biggest
problem.."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
56. trying to make a liar out of clarke...
comparing sandy's briefing of condi about al- qaida versus clarke's statement she looked as if she had never heard about al-qaida!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
57. I do find it interesting that everyone is saying they haven't read...
Clarke's book. While I am sure it is "technically" true, there is no way they are not intimately familiar with the contents. Those that support Clarke most likely have read relevant excerpts and the bush cabal the same given that the book was in the hands of the WH for 3 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. Not to mention....
Clarke spoke to the Commission for a total of 21 hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
59. bob the bomber kerrey will you please...
Shut Up Shut Up Shut Up!!! What a fucking waste of time listening to his 1998 timewarp crap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. I'm tired of him too. he NEVER has a point...just rambles and acts snotty
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. bullshit Kerrey! When Clinton tried to go after Taliban, others were....
...claiming "wag the dog"! Fuck you and your lack of long term memory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. and how dare Kerrey suggest that because Clinton was able....
to go after Milosovic (a man in the process of committing GENOCIDE at the time) that he should have been able to go after an allusive group of terrorists when people didn't even believe the terrorists were that big a deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. as a lame duck to boot
Its preposterous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Bearded_Liberal Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Yep...
.....he had not one question for George Tenet but here he goes again with Sandy Berger, blaming the Clinton administration for 9/11.

What a schmuck!

With the likes of Bob Kerrey (supposedly) on our side, no wonder we are in the mess we are in today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. A schmuck is a part of the best part of a man -
This son of a bitch is showing his bias hatred for Clinton. Fuck you Bob Kerrey you fucking asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. He is so full of it! Yeah, right, "if you had come to Congress....
and told them, etc..." How many times did Clinton go to Congress for funding and support and what did they do to him??? They shot him down constantly! It is so obvious that Kerrey despises Clinton and his every rant is ABC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Kerrey is nothing more than an egotisical politician.
His grandstanding is quickly getting old. Would he have preferred Clinton bomb anything just to use bombs? This commission is nothing but a farce.

P.S. Why does the head of the commission always interrupt the democratic members of the commission? (except Kerrey, of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. You've noticed that too, eh?...
"P.S. Why does the head of the commission always interrupt the democratic members of the commission? (except Kerrey, of course)" It is a farce; the questions they are asking are all about pre/911. When are they going to get to what happened on 9/11, when Bush was in charge, NOT Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Jamie Gorelick said they will address the day of 9/11
later in the investigation. What is frustrating to me is the hijack of the direction of the questions. They are blaming clinton and chimpy is blameless. Sickening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. Did anyone else hear one of the commission members
reading from a direct report about that infamous PDB briefing on Aug 6th. It made definitive references to "airplanes", I don't remember who read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. ps.... i think you know the answer to that....
and it must be glaringly obvious to the families sitting there too.

welcome to DU RoundRock :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
73. Kean asks about planes flying into buildings
Berger doesn't recall this being a 'modality' that was more likely than others...

He's covering for Condi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Clinton/Berger
share blame with Bush/Condi for the aircraft being hijacked in my judgment. Of course congress and the FAA share as well. No one wanted to spend the money to improve airport/aircraft security. pre 9/11, at least not significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. so he's covering his own ass as well
upon further reflection, he didn't say that they knew nothing about it; only that it wasn't more important than other terrorist techniques. Basically he's saying they did know; Condi said she had no clue.

BTW, is that Clark's wife on the podium? She's hot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. She is the unknown
hottie in that pic. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. Clinton increased spending on fighting terrorism 350%
How much did Bush* increase it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Yes! I thought for a "yes" or "no" answer...
...he took a helluva long time to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vetwife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. Bob Kerrey has an axe to grinde
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 01:13 PM by vetwife
J Kerry not to be confused with Bob in Nebraska hated B Clinton.
He held the congressional medal of honor and was one of the 150 I am fairly sure that J Kerry was referring to as did really bad things in Nam. His axe to grinde wtih B Clinton is all about the deferrments. He used to have an axe to grind with Bush being AWOL then backed up on everything he said. Kerrey in my opinion is off balance and I know vets and this is one vet who is about three loaves short of a whole loaf. No direspect to the veterans, you know how I love them and help them but when they aren't thinking real straight or get a fixation, they are out of control. Bob Kerrey is visibly out of control towards anything that will help J. Kerrey. My take. He will use this commission to help Kerry stay out of the whitehouse if he can. Watch and see if he doesn't lose control with Clarke? He also was on the Whitewater investigations. Holding Clinton to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
80. If you listen to the media,
everytime they assess blame, they always say the Clinton AND the Bush administrations. The Bush admn may get blamed but they will blame the Clinton admn too.

That's what's goanna happen. Any bets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
81. Bush 41 alleged assassination attempt
Since it has been referenced so many times in these hearings, lets look at what was discovered, because at this point it is the sole reason for Iraq.

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/content/?020930fr_archive02

A Case Not Closed
by Seymour M. Hersh
Issue of 1993-11-01


"In interviews over the summer, many past and present American intelligence officials expressed little surprise that the Clinton Administration had predicated the bombing of Baghdad on such conflicting and dubious evidence. One C.I.A. analyst explained, "Of course nobody wants to say, 'There's nothing to it, Mr. President,' especially when other guys are pushing it. The President asks the intelligence analysts for the bottom line: Is this for real or not? You can't really lose by saying yes." That hard-line attitude—"hanging tough" in a crisis—has marked many of America's intelligence failures since the beginning of the Cold War.

Thus, on a Saturday in June, the President and his advisers could not resist proving their toughness in the international arena. If they had truly had full confidence in what they were telling the press and the public about Saddam Hussein's involvement in a plot to kill George Bush, they would almost certainly have ordered a far fiercer response than they did. As it was, confronted with evidence too weak to be conclusive but, in their view, perhaps not weak enough to be dismissed, they chose to fire missiles at night at an intelligence center in the middle of a large and populous city."


Dr.Ron Paul
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul58.html

I don't believe he's a republican. He never sides with them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
82. Suggest new thread starting with Clarke testimony 1:30 reconvene
n/t

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vetwife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. We need an expert lip reader..these folks laughing and talking
If we had an expert lip reader on this forum, would help a lot ! They are saying things that they clearly don't wan th mikes to pick up and what they are not saying could be as important as what they are saying. Any lip readers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
85. Richard Clarke apologizing to the 9/11 families stating that
he and the govt failed them and us for not protecting them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. very sincere I thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
86. Clarke said he failed the families of 9/11 and asked for forgiveness.
He said they all failed. They tried, but they failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Your government failed you. I failed you,
No higher priority in the Clinton admin than terra - but not so in Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. First one to admit failure and say he's sorry
Nice for a change. It wasn't get old with the nothing would have mattered tone taken by most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
89. Nails it right at the start by stating that Bush said (in the
Woodward book) that "I didn't feel a sense of urgency" re terrorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
91. I found Richard Clarke's sincere apology to be...
a stark reminder to all of us what this inquiry is all about. Very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. I wonder if our fearless leader is watching Clarke testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
93. Bombshell!
Asked to be reassigned in May or June due to frustration with Bushies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. Cut off at the pass the Bushies' statement that he was "demoted"....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. He's killing them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
96. They need to subpoena Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
97. Clarke corrects Gorton on the Counter Terrorism Group
Shouldn't he know this?

Oh wait, nevermind.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
98. New Thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC