Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarke --- in the loop or out of it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:08 AM
Original message
Clarke --- in the loop or out of it?
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 05:31 AM by radfringe
couple of puzzlers here...

1. the WH attack dogs have stated that Clarke was out of the loop

given Clarke's experience and knowledge of terrorism -- why was he out of the loop? seems to me that if you are really taking terrorism seriously that you would have wanted Clarke actively in the loop...

2. in typical spin fashion -- WH attack dogs have also stated that they acted on Clarke's suggestions

ummmm...if Clarke was OUT OF THE LOOP then how would you know what those suggestions were?

more flip-flops, spins or loop-de-loops?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he was out, it proves his point
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 05:14 AM by sampsonblk
Why was the top terrorism guy out of the damn loop, Condi?

Ken Lay was in the loop. Other oil execs got briefings on Iraq years in advance. Why was Clarke out of the loop and not them? Some shit needs to hit the fan here. We gotta keep pressing these points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. little Scottie Mc Cellen said Monday that....
Clarke refused to attend their meetings. I read it right here
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/03/20040322-4.html

Q Scott, you, earlier, said that Clarke had refused orders to attend a certain number of meetings. You said that in the gaggle this morning. Can you tell me, what do you mean by that? Were there meetings he was supposed to attend that he didn't attend? Did he have to be ordered --

MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, Dr. Rice --

Q -- and the timetable for --

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, Dr. Rice, early on in the administration, started holding daily briefings with the senior directors of the National Security Council, of which he was one. But he refused to attend those meetings, and he was later asked to attend those meetings and he continued to refuse to attend those meetings. You would have to ask --

Q Why?

MR. McCLELLAN: You'd have to ask him why. But those, obviously, are important meetings, and meetings that are held on a daily basis by the National Security Advisor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clarke, Not Clark
You mean Dick Clarke, who could be called the Dick Clark of public service (Jon Stewart).

Without the 'e' someone might think you're after the General!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was out of the loop
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 05:32 AM by radfringe
during that particular class on spelling....

:D

meanwhile -- my bad :spank:, and it's been fixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And No, I Don't Think He Was Out of The Loop
or loupe. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DODI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fred Kaplan's Slate Article -"Clarke was the loop"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RhodaGrits Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. In the Loop? You mean the man the Bush Admin had...
running the Situation Room the morning of 9/11 wasn't in the Loop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I noticed something about this on Tweety last night
When they played Dickless Cheney's statement saying Clarke was "out of the loop", they said it came on a "radio show" interview, but conveniently didn't mention it was on OxyRush's show.

Methinks they are embarrassed by the FatDrugBoy and only allow him to speak to the vast unwashed. Never is OxyRush mentioned on "polite" television.

Kinda telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Clarke had access to Bush and Rice which proves he was out of the loop.
This is according to Cheney and Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting use of old phrase
Hey, Cheney, got something from the past sticking in your craw?

Remember Bush I lied to the public when he claimed he was "out of the loop" on Iran-Contra?

Of course, Clarke was NOT out of the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. born liars all of them
amazing how the press never hits them with the tough questions but allows them to squirm away like the traitors they are. I notice they all have the same lines as if they get briefed in the 'damage control how to lie' room. They should be confronted head on with questions like, hey scott are you saying he's a flat out liar? Was he in the loop, or as cheney said "out of the loop", then if he was out of the loop, what did they say about our ability to fight terrorism?

Also that resignation letter was just that, a polite way to part ways. As Howard Fineman of Newsweek pointed out it stated that he praised the presidents leadership on 9/11 but NOT a blanket statement of approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avis Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Outrageous
that Cheney would say that a antiterrorism expert was out of the loop - that makes it even worse? If they leave out the experts, they really are at fault for not doing enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Expect Clarke to be villified by repubs and Kerrey today
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 08:43 AM by mmonk
especially in order to shift blame for everything on the Clinton administration and concluding inaction on terrorism while he was in the Clinton administration was part of the problem. Remember, this is about continuing present US foreign policy and those that like it will definitely do what they can at avoiding any truths that may hinder them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. You just hung yourself, Cheney
I didn't want to address this until I had all the facts, to wit, that Vice President Dick Cheney personally said for all the world to hear that Clarke was out of the loop. Well, congratulations Dick--you've plunked yourself right in the middle of a no-win situation, and you may have corroborated Clarke's testimony without really trying!

If you're lying in hopes of making Clarke look like a liar, you're scum. But if you're telling the truth, well, WHY was Clarke left out of the loop, and why didn't you care? If he was derelict in his job duties, why wasn't replaced? OR...was Clarke PUT out of the loop so that you and Georgie could push your OWN political and military agenda? Either way, Cheney, you've got some explaining to do!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. He was the loop....
He had more experience than all of them combined...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Out Of The Loop" ...
... is corporate-speak for attempting to insult and humilate employees.

Take it from me, I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Clarke was out of the loopy loop, but in the real loop.
The loopy loop of Bush, Condi, et. al., who wanted a GROUND war with IRAQ didn't like Clarke's memo that said Iraq was not connected to 9/11. When asked to UPDATE the memo whose ink was still drying, Clarke wrote that there is NO CONNECTION between 9/11 and Iraq.

The president did not read that updated memo and Clarke was not invited to meet with the loopy loopers again.

I gather he rathers to retire than to be in a loopy loop that would have him as a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Meeting With Outta-Loopers Post 9/11?
Why was he doing THAT? The out of loop thing is a dumb lie that looks bad for them either way...

I like how Jon Stewart reacted to Scottie's "GWB was not in the situation room" the day after 9/11 -- WHAT IS HE SAVING THE SITUATION ROOM FOR THEN? TIME TO TAKE THE PLASTIC OFF THE CHAIRS IN THE SITUATION ROOM -- THERE'S A SITUATION!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC