Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

i fear Dean may be unelectable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:00 PM
Original message
i fear Dean may be unelectable
not because of some bullshit non-issues like gay marriage or patriotism, but because of taxes. The majority of Americans probably don't like Bush's "if we have economic problems we'll just cut taxes and see what happens" plan, but if he wants to cut child tax credits, reinstate the marriage penalty, and actually completely reverse the bush tax cut (Kerry said he'd just reverse it for the richest classes, which is practically the whole thing anyway), Bush will probably make the election pretty simple: Dean is the "high taxes" candidate, he is the "low taxes" candidate, and vote what you want your tax level to be. It's obvious what people would pick. How can he handle this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. A Middle Class Tax Cut Is A Winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mjb4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:06 PM
Original message
He will BRING IT!
if he doesn't win, he will bring the fight to BUSH and not have him hide behind Rush Limbaugh and his Nazi robot copy-cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tax the Rich
Edited on Mon Aug-04-03 05:18 PM by ThorsteinVeblen
Don't repeal the taxe cuts for anyone who makes under $300,000 a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I Think $75,000 Is A Better Benchmark
I wish I made $300,000.00

If you're making $300,000.00 plus I envy you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm with ThorsteinVeblen on this. Actually, I'm in favor of adding another
Edited on Mon Aug-04-03 05:35 PM by w4rma
upper tax bracket for $.5 million or even $1 million and up.

Less folks to get angry at Dems and we're more precicely targeting robber barons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Perhaps singles
but for married professionals, this mark is reached fairly easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Clinton raised taxes on $180,000 and up....
150,000 on up works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendofbenn Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. and where do you find money for social programs?
americans dont need tax cuts. whatever class they are. the u.s has the lowest taxes in the industrialized world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope - depends on how you sell it
Edited on Mon Aug-04-03 05:11 PM by T Roosevelt
His stand is not a bad thing - the challenge is to counter the soon-to-be GOP spin on how not having tax cuts is bad. Of course the last three years are a perfect example of that complete BS. Just point out the fact that yes, fed tax went down, but how much did your property, sales, state income, etc tax increase?

Like it or not the next pres is going to have to likely raise taxes (on the rich), or at least eliminate completely scheduled tax cuts (for the rich). Of course the rich won't like it...oh well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonquest8 Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. All Dems have to do is to stick to 'class-warfare rhetoric'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. The deficit the deficit the deficit
AND JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ranking electability
Howard Dean
Cash on Hand Q1: $2.1 million
Raised Q2: $7.6 million
Cash spent Q2: $3.3 million
Cash on hand: $6.4 million

John Kerry
Cash on Hand Q1: $8.1 million
Raised Q2: $5.9 million
Cash spent Q2: $3.1 million
Cash on hand: $10.9 million

(Vice President Gore)

Joe Lieberman
Cash on Hand Q1: $1.8 million
Raised Q2: $5.1 million
Cash spent Q2: $2.9 million
Cash on hand: $4 million

John Edwards
Cash on Hand Q1: $5.7 million
Raised Q2: $4.5 million
Cash spent Q2: $2.1 million
Cash on hand: $8.1 million

Dick Gephardt
Cash on Hand Q1: $5 million
Raised Q2: $3.8 million
Cash spent Q2: $2.5 million
Cash on hand: $6.3 million

Bob Graham
Cash on Hand Q1: $1.1 million
Raised Q2: $2 million
Cash spent Q2: $1.3 million
Cash on hand: $1.8 million

(Sen. Clinton)

Dennis Kucinich
Cash on Hand Q1: $51,000
Raised Q2: $1.5 million
Cash spent Q2: $0.5 million
Cash on hand: $1.1 million

Rev. Sharpton

(General Clark)

Rep. Mosely Braun

Source for numbers: http://www.dailykos.com/archives/003411.html#003411
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Those Figures Inaccurate
Your campaign financial figures exclude federal matching funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Oh, yeah. And Howard wins BIG on that one
Because in Q2 alone, there were thousands of individual donors -- up to $250 each is matchable during the primary season.

:wow:

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cut the payroll tax, but roll back the upper class and dividend taxes.
...that's the ticket. Otherwise its too much like: "Eat your brocoli, people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. He wants to start over.
He'll be releasing a plan in September, and if he can afford tax cuts for the poor-middle class he'll include them, but he doesn't believe he should be promoting expanded healthcare coverage and fully funding special ed unless there is a way to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think you are wrong
I think Dean will balance the budget and give us a foreign policy we won't be ashamed off like what Team Simian has given us.

Dean's team seems a bit too smart to let what you predict happen as well. Very pro-active campaign.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SEAburb Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm glad you have seen the light ButterflyBlood
Dean's tax policy will aleinate the working poor, the middle class, minority, and independent voters. It would be '84 and Mondale all over again. You can't tell the voters the truth on raising taxes during an election campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoYaCallinAlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. So true . . . tax increases and anti-war positions don't sit well with
the ESSENTIAL suburban, educated middle-class swing voters. Without them voting for our candidate, Bush will win in a cakewalk. Of course, that's just an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. The issue will be about JOBS, not taxes. . .
Tax cuts don't mean jackshit if you are out of work or if you get zonked on the state and local tax level to compensate.

Another thing: if * and the GOP are good for taxpayers, home come so many of us are paying MORE taxes??

And another: if * and the GOP are good for business, how come so many are out of business, and so many aren't working??


:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. That is only one part of the equation....
Everybody (the media) focuses on Dean repealing the * tax cut. The fact is, Dean will repeal the tax cut, BUT in it's place will provide health care to those who need it.

He is right on this issue, and it plays very well with voters. Surveys and polls show time and again that most Americans would exchange their "tax cut" for a life time portable health plan for themselves and their children.

The question Dean asks is simple, "would you rather have the "tax cut" (that you didn't really get if you are middle class because your state and local taxes will/are going up....), or would you rather have heath care for your children?"

My bet is that most will choose health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC