Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Clarke and Rand Beers...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Grins Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:12 AM
Original message
Richard Clarke and Rand Beers...?
Remember this guy? Rand Beers? Anyone know if he has been called to testify in front of the 9/11 Commission?

Heard a bit of Laura Ingram’s’; show today. Her guest was Byron York. Both of them tearing into the Richard Clarke segment on “60 Minutes last night. (In case you were wondering, it was Clinton’s fault. And Laura wanted to know that, if Clarke was so concerned, and so great an American, why didn’t he bring the pending threat to the attention of the administration? Go public? Scream your head off?)

Wouldn’t be great to have Rand Beers at the 9/11 Commission? Let him be interviewed right after – or with - Richard Clarke. Instead of just Clarke, have Dubya, Condi, Wolfie, and the RW media try to argue against two long-serving insiders!

And what can they say? “When asked about Beers, Sean McCormack, an NSC spokesman, said, "At the time he submitted his resignation, he said he had decided to leave government. We thanked him for his three decades of government service.”

(Snips)
"The administration wasn't matching its deeds to its words in the war on terrorism. They're making us less secure, not more secure," said Beers, who until now has remained largely silent about leaving his National Security Council job as special assistant to the president for combating terrorism. "As an insider, I saw the things that weren't being done. And the longer I sat and watched, the more concerned I became, until I got up and walked out."

“… He is an unlikely insurgent. He served on the NSC under Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and the current Bush. … "Counterterrorism is like a team sport. The game is deadly. There has to be offense and defense," Beers said. "The Bush administration is primarily offense, and not into teamwork."

“ Beers will say that the administration is "underestimating the enemy." It has failed to address the root causes of terror, he said. "The difficult, long-term issues both at home and abroad have been avoided, neglected or shortchanged and generally underfunded...The Homeland Security Department is underfunded. There has been little, if any, follow-through on cybersecurity, port security, infrastructure protection and immigration management. Authorities don't know where the sleeper cells are, he said. Vulnerable segments of the economy, such as the chemical industry, "cry out for protection."



Lost the link, but the above is from, “Former Aide Takes Aim at War on Terror”, By Laura Blumenfeld, Washington Post, Monday, June 16, 2003; Page A01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RhodaGrits Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. here's the link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your going to love this
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 06:32 PM by rmpalmer
When Clarke went over to his pre-requested cyber-terrorism job originally scheduled for October 1st but delayed by 9-11.

Former General Wayne Downing took his place. Within months he quit in disgust claims Clarke.

John Gordon and Randy Beers took Downing's place. Months later Beers quit telling Clarke "They still don't get it. Insteada goin' all out against al Qaida and eliminating our vulnerabilities at home, they wanna fuckin' invade Iraq again. We have a token U.S. military force in Afghanistan, the Taliban are regrouping, we haven't caught bin Laden, or his deputy, or the head of the Taliban. And they aren't going to send more troops to Afghanistan to catch them or to help the government in Kabul secure the country. No, they're holding back, waiting to invade Iraq. Do you know how much it will strengthen al Qaeda and groups like that if we occupy Iraq? There's no threat to us now from Iraq, but 70 percent of the American people think Iraq attacked the Pentagon and the WTC. You wanna know why? Because that's what the administration wants them to think!"

Beers also told Clarke how pissed he was at them using the War on Terror politically, the Karl Rove memo and what they did to Cleland. Beers is a Vietnam vet who lost his hearing in one ear there. "I can't work for these people, I'm sorry I can't."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC