|
Edited on Sun Mar-21-04 01:55 PM by TruthIsAll
This is an important topic which has not been addressed, although I have posted another thread on it today.
Polling fraud is a required prerequisite for voting fraud. If Bush polling numbers fall too low (say 44% job approval), Diebold could not steal it for him. It would be too obvious. That's why exit polls were not published in the 2002 elections; they were at variance with the fraudulent Diebold touch-screen voting numbers.
Manipulating polling numbers is easily accomplished. Just bias the polling random sample of 1000 respondents by a slight adjustment to increase the number of phone calls to Bush-leaning districts. Another way would be to sample in more heavily-weighted Repub precincts.
Lets see how this could be done.
Assume 1000 people are polled throughout the nation. In a fair, unbiased sample, assume Bush would get 45% approval, or 450 (+/- 3% MOE). This is too low by 3%. The solution is to sample more aggressively in Repub strongholds to get 30 pro-Bush respondents. This will get him 480 (48%), a number close enough for Diebold to steal without raising eyebrows..
As Bush numbers have been a steady drip-drip since 9/11, he is now at the Mendoza line of 48% approval. The time to stop the bleeding is NOW, otherwise he will continue to free-fall to 40%.
Is this just conspiratorial rumination on my part?
Then ask yourself the following: What good is Diebold if Bush is so far behind in the polls? Did Bush steal the election in 2000? Did he steal the Senate in 2002? Did Bush lie about $150 billion in medicare costs? Did he lie about going to war? Is he stonewalling the 9/11 commission? Has the media been giving him a free ride? Are the pollsters working for Fox, Cnn, NBC, AP, CSM, Time, etc? Are these media giants pro-Bush?
Yes to all the above.
Remember. Bush cannot win a fair election.
|