Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney on TV blaming terrorism on Clinton (1993 WTC bombing)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:01 PM
Original message
Cheney on TV blaming terrorism on Clinton (1993 WTC bombing)
LISTEN UP!!!

I posted a few days ago a question about how many attacks on America occured BEFORE we put troops in Saudi Arabia?

THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE ANSWER SHOWS A DIRECT LINK BETWEEN OSAMA ATTACKS AGAINST THE US AND OUR TROOPS BEING IN SAUDIA ARABIA.

Folks, this shit all started with Bush Sr and his Desert Storm, not with Bill Clinton. You may not like Islamics or Muslims but you can take them at their word. They do not deny their acts nor do they give phony reasons for their actions. Osama said that 9/11 was a direct response to two things: our military being on holy Islamic land (Saudi Arabia) and the US backing of Israeli brutality against the Palestinians. All kinds of talking heads give their "talking point" reasons for 9/11 like the stupid statement that "they hate us because of our freedoms." But there is no reason to not take Osama and now al-qaeda at their word. They have demonstrated that they are true to their word while American leaders are not. The latest statement published by al-qaeda is that we should get out of their land, stop attacking them, and they will stop attacking us. Now Cheney is on TV giving more dribble about WMDs and the evil of the terrorists. Cheney has no right or authority to speak against Kerry's positions on terrorism when he (Cheney) was a major player in building up Saddam's eveil regime.

WE WILL NEVER WIN THIS 'WAR' UNTIL WE UNDERSTAND OUR ENEMY AND BE HONEST ABOUT OUR OWN MOTIVES. 9/11 would never have happened had we removed our troops from Saudi Arabia and had we adopted a more even-handed approach to the ME situation. I may be the only one on this board who feels this way, but it is imortant to keep this perspective before the American people. No matter how much and how often the Arabs, Islamics, or Muslims state their grievences we simply ignore what they say and continue to spin it the way the PNACers want.
We do this at our own peril and peril of the safety and security of the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is making me sick!
Fuck you Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. He reads well. I like the shiny top of his head
Quick hand me my speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you think if we did all that
Edited on Wed Mar-17-04 02:09 PM by rumguy
Al Queda would be friendly? Would we still not be the Great Satan?

On Edit: Got some links for me? I do like propositions that rattle the established thinking about any subject....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. They don't have to be "friendly" but they would probably leave us alone!
You don't have to like us, how many peoples do we actually "like" or have to be "friendly" with? But we leave most of them alone. I take them at their word since they have been truer to their words than we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. I believe our troops have been taken out of Saudi Arabia
Exactly when is Al Queda going to stop blowing things up? And do you really think our foreign policy should be dictated by them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since I've been listening, it's a speech on Kerry...
Mischaracterizations, half-truths, lies, spin...

I hope the Kerry people get on this PRONTO!!!

The juxtaposition of this speech with the horror in Baghdad, split-screen, is just too amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. That speech was disgusting. Imagine being
lectured by someone who claims "he had better things to do" than sign up and fight in Vietnam but now has no qualms about sending someone else's children to die. Now that's chutzpah!!!

And he's been hiding in an "undisclosed location" since 9/11. What a friggin coward!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney/Bush is scared
The 911 report will come out soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. 9/11 9/11 9/11.....
Shameful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. that is EXACTLY what it is
the report must be scathing for them to test out their ridiculous talking points en masse now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. ABC!
Allways
Blame
Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Back Slapping Bubba's
One B.J and you are crucified for the sins of the neo-cons!

I can't help but think that somewhere in this country there are a couple of trailer park Bubba's watching the Chimp's Cheney on TV, back slapping each other saying, see I knew it all along Bubba! We gonna vote for Bush!
This is another reason why we have to remove the ability of ones signature being a bond with a mark of an X!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunk76 Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is using...
the dead to take a free shot at Kerry...Mr.Cheney...sir, u are a complete low life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. just how many time did Cheney's terrorism task force meet prior to 9/11
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jeese. Surreal. Burning Bagdad and Cheney side by side on TV
And he's spinning success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. one bit, this didn't start with Poppy in 91
it started when we put the shah in in a coup, when we supported the house of saud for their oil money, when we began supportingisrael undonditionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Really. What conditions would you put on support of Israel?
I'd like to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lest we forge the bush cave-in to the terrorists:
Osama wanted us out of Saudi Arabia, and he got exactly what he wanted -- courtesy solely of G. W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. bush/cheney 04 "giving ossama all he demands for 4 more years"
Stand Up America , vote these greedy slithering Snakes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Considering what's happening in Baghdad,
shouldn't Cheney be working? Shouldn't he be at his desk or in his bunker or at a meeting or on the phone or doing *something* to find out what happened, what is happening now, and what needs to happen next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. HA HA, HA HA HA HA
unless they are screwing over the American people THEY DON'T WORK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Or fundraising, it seems to me they work pretty damned hard at that!
Edited on Wed Mar-17-04 03:25 PM by ignatius
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I am sure the taxpayers are footing the bill so technically he is working
Bush/Chaney don't make a big deal out of keeping campaigning separate from governing, in case you hadn't noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Abandon Israel because Osama wants it?
And then our women can start wearing burkas so as not to offend him.

Wouldn't want to upset anyone who can build a bomb and strap it to a ten year old, now would we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Disagree.
"the US backing of Israeli brutality against the Palestinians"

This can be shortened to US backing of Israel. The brutality aspect is part of the message but Osama doesn't want a Jewish Palestine.

That doesn't change the fact that Cheney is being dishonest.

"But there is no reason to not take Osama and now al-qaeda at their word"

Word can't describe how naive this statement is.

"The latest statement published by al-qaeda is that we should get out of their land, stop attacking them, and they will stop attacking us."

Will it? See appeasement in the dictionary.

Even assuming the most optimistic scenario that Al Queda will stop, doesn't mean others will not take his group's place. You are swallowing the Bush spin that AlQueda is the end all, be all of terrorism. France just got a threat from some group over their head scarf ban. Whther its legit or not remains to be seen

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/ap/ap_story.html/Intl/AP.V7067.AP-France-Islamic-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Well, show me where Osama or al-qaeda have not lived up to thier word
I may not like what they say or agree with it, but they seem to say exactly what they mean and do exactly what they say, unlike this Bush administration for which many lies and misinformation can be documented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The enemy of your enemy....
"I may not like what they say or agree with it, but they seem to say exactly what they mean and do exactly what they say, unlike this Bush administration for which many lies and misinformation can be documented."

People who hold life of the non believer as void and who have willingly slaughtered as many innocents as possible to create a climate of fear are not people I put faith in to stop violence.

The Bush admin's lying doesn't make Al-queda credible.

The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend by any means.

Oh and if Osama keeps his word this is going to be a long conflict regardless of what the US does. Read some of his transcripts

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=osama+transcript

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Do you have a link to the latest al Qaeda statement?
How do we know yet that this statement is authentic? Whose the source?

Thanks

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Try google
With France and terror.....I just grabbed the first google news link.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=france+terror

Apparently its some previously unknown group and the are checking the veracity. Like I said whther this is some new faction or not remains to be seen. Considering the uproar the scarf ban caused in the large Muslim community in France it is not a big leap to think some will get militant about it.

The article in the original post also says the largest Muslim party in France denounced this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. There have been a number of different statements
the last few days.

I believe the statement you are refering to, is from one of the other statements, not the French one. Some of the other statements are very likely bogus and that is why I was curious exactly which statement you were quoting from, especially since the actual text of a lot of these supposed statements hasn't even been released?


Thanks again.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Questions...confusion
Were you looking for the latest Al-Quaeda statement regarding the Madrid bombings, the one where Osama talks about not allowing Palestine to be Jewish or the one from the unknown group about French headscarves?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Sorry, I guess I should have addressed my question
to Keithyboy. You were referring to his a quote in his original statement, "The latest statement published by al-qaeda is that we should get out of their land, stop attacking them, and they will stop attacking us."

Sometimes it's easy to get lost in a thread and I was curious about this particular statement because I believe it is from one of the bogus statements that have come out in the last few days. The reason why I am so curious is because I believe I have found the original source for some of these statements and I know that some of this noise and chatter, especially the stuff in December was being created here in the US by Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mick Knox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am Nauseated by Cheney's speech...
I am equally nauseated at the deafening silence from Kerry.

That was the longer commercial for shrub.

Ugh.

Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Excuse me Cheney, but...
The first WTC bombing happened, when, only 3-4 months after Clinton was first inagurated? And not only did Clinton NOT blame the previous administration, the criminals who did this were caught, tried and are now rotting in jail. So, Cheney, how's your administration's track record? Hmmmm? (crickets chirping)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Plus they confessed to the plans for Project Bojinka
where they planned to blow up 11 hijacked jets at the same time and to fly airplanes into buildings.

Too bad Condi couldn't be bothered to do her homework. She should have at least read the transcripts from the NYC terrorist trials. They were even available on the internet for awhile. The testimony of terrorists spells out in great detail their plans and their networks. Clinton handed all this to the Bu$h misadministration on a silver platter, but W and Condi were too busy doing photo ops to bother their beautiful minds with such things.

If Al Gore was in the WH, you could be damn sure that he would have continued surveying Osama with the drones, which would have been equipped with missiles at this point, since that technology was just becoming available at the beginning of 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. I missed it.
What exactly did Cheney say in blaming Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC