Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush* isn't the problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:16 PM
Original message
Bush* isn't the problem
It is important to keep this in mind. Bush is merely a symptom. The disease, the cancer that is killing this country, is conservatism. How are we going to extract the cancer of conservatism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. one way would be to insist on a progressive, liberal...
...opposition party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good Plan, lets make congress 80% Republican
That should make things much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I think you've just proven the original post's point....
Fear of change = conservatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. So any change is positive?
I think you are the wrong forum if you think that a 1 party government is liberal or progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Step one:
Get rid of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly, stop the bleeding, then start curing the disease.
This battle wont end for a very very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. by start doing right as liberals
pretty big there but hear and agree. by not lieing and bullshit, we know more than the news gives either cause they dont know and i think they do just dont report. they have to clearly understand. all these people are going off premise they dont have to tell us what is up. we get the info with out them now

they have to see lieing isnt going to pay. kerry has to start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. There needs to be balance in everything sustainable
Conservatism at its root is beneficial to any democracy, providing there is equal representation of liberalism. Greed has taken over conservatism, extract that, not the traditional conservative ideology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The modern conservative movement is a cancer.
This is not to say that in some times and places, a "balance" between conservatism and something else might not have been possible, or even desireable. But it is not even possible here and now. You don't balance a little disease with a little health -- you get rid of the disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. ONE DAY AT A TIME
WHAT HAS TO BE DONE FIRST IS TO GET OUT THE TRUTH. OF COURSE, WE ALREADY KNOW THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET IT FROM "FOXPROPAGANDA", OR ANY MAJOR NEWS SOURCE THEY STAND NOW. THAT OLD SAYING,"THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE", IS SO TRUE. THERE'S THE RUB--THE CONSERVATIVES DON'T WANT ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES TO BE FREE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. its not conservative!!!
they are reactionaries...first lets get the terms right!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. No. Conservatism is NOT what this is.
We really need to get our definitions straight. Real conservatism would be a good and natural balance, the different sides keeping each other honest. But fascism is NOT conservatism. What we have here is fascism. Or, to put it in more modern terminology: corporatism.

Corporations are NOT inherently good. They ARE inherently anti-democratic. A nation cannot fire its citizens. Therefore a nation has different goals than profitability. We have been ignoring those goals and refusing to define them as a national purpose. The purpose of a nation is NOT to facilitate corporate goals. If a corporation is willing to conform to national goals, it can be accepted and encouraged, but if it's not, then the corporation is a parasitical force, leeching and destroying the nation.

So, what are our national goals? THAT's the discourse we've been avoiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trixie Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. More steps
Righto - get rid of the idiot

Then we need to completely seperate church and state. No more pandering to the religious right!

Next we need to give freedom to ALL citizens, not just the ones we like.

there's more but I am too tired.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Calling it by a different name won't change what it is.
Let the people who call themselves "conservative" decide what the word means. In fact, they do decide that, by their actions, which show them to be vectors of disease.

Conservatism is not yours to reform, you know. We had better work on reforming what we are, not fantasize that conservatives can be different than they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. you're on the right track but i think it's
NEOCON, NEOCONSERVATIVE, that's the word, and we've got to do to IT what they've done to the word LIBERAL! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think one thing that will help
is all the movement of people into traditionally conservative areas like parts of the South and Midwest. Thin out the ranks of the gop with more of us. Dilute their strongholds of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Extremist conservatism is the "cancer,"
exacerbated by the zealotry of its adherents, and their enabling by a press that isn't holding up its end of the bargain of a democratic system. The cancer is far advanced, with all three branches of our government under extremist control, but I've not yet lost all hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. I wouldn't call it conservatism,
conservatism is a lot more sensible than this. The only phrase that comes to mind is that the GOPigs are the anti-federalist feudalist party , the AFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. It IS a different wing of Conslobative were talkin here
Its the extremist wing that seems to be the strong voice in the party while "decent" people go unheard.

I think theyve blown their wad. The credibility factor , which is really hurting, is where we get them out of Dodge.

Its something we must combine. No credibilty and Conservative. The two must become one.

Screw trying to distinguish the difference in NEOs and Cons. It makes it more complicated which lessens your chances of linking the two words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC