What's more obscene?A bare breast or using dead bodies for political gain?

[NNN0LHI]

[molly]

1. Dear Don

LOL!!!

[daveskilt]

2. whose bare breast? I mean janets is fine but henry hyde?

that would be obscene

[CBHagman]

8. Thanks a lot for that image, daveskilt.

I was EATING when I read your post. Nekkid Henry Hyde! Aiee!!!

[madrchsod]

3. bare breasts

the ruination of the morality of our fine young men,many who are fighting overseas to preserve our way of life. dead bodies? that makes a man out of them...this really is a sick society that uses either for political gain

[readmylips]

4. Baba Bushie's bare breast offensive....

don't want to see that.

[polmaven]

5. Baba

Senior or Junior? Hmmm?

[Kimber Scott]

6. Vote in Arizona poll on this subject.

http://www.azcentral.com/

[rucky]

7. Whos bare breast?

[northernsoul]

10. 'cuz if it's Rove's bare breast - that's definitely worse!

*shudder!*

[kayell]

9. Breasts are symbols (and reality) of nurture and life

so obviously to a winger they are more obscene.

[iverglas]

11. bare breast ... or violence against women?

I can't get over how so many people seem to think that the Janet Jackson incident was just a bit of innocent tit-baring that nobody should get all worked up about.

I saw it. My immediate, gut response was that I had just witnessed an appalling act of degrading sexual violence against a woman played out in front of millions of people ... consisting rather largely of men and male children in a particularly male-centric context, pro sports ... as an okay thing to do. Not an appropriate time and place for such a bit of artistic expression, if there were one anyway.

A man ripping a woman's clothing off and exposing her breast to an audience? Sorry, that's not entertainment, folks.

It matters not whether Jackson was a collaborator; the image and message conveyed was the same, whether she was a party to it or not. And it matters little whether Timberlake expected her to have underwear on; the act and the message were still the same.

And DU was one of the places where I'd thought I might see some acknowledgement of the nature of that act and message, and some recognition of the fuss about a bare boob being a bit of a smokescreen over the real problem. I didn't see a whole lot.

It is not prudery to object to a woman's clothing being ripped off and her breast exposed to an audience of football fans. Really.

.