Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perle fired? (oh, so he did not resign to keep from being a burden?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:17 PM
Original message
Perle fired? (oh, so he did not resign to keep from being a burden?)
"So it seems that Richard Perle, the ringleader of the neoconservative foreign policy team, didn't fall. He was pushed.

--snip--

But his resignation wasn't voluntary. Already embroiled in a tangle of commercial conflict of interest controversies, Perle last year stepped down as the DPB chairman, but held onto his membership. Now, according to reliable sources, Perle was outright fired because of two last straws.

Last Straw No. 1—maybe it should be called Next-to-Last Straw—was the report in the Times of London that an internal investigation at Hollinger International, where Perle served as a member of the board of directors, turned up the fact that Perle failed to disclose to shareholders a $3 million bonus that he received—among other things, a violation of Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Sources report that the Pentagon's inspector general brought this to Rumsfeld's attention.

Last Straw No. 2 was Perle's call for the ouster of Admiral Lowell Jacoby, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Rumsfeld might have fired Perle over the Hollinger mess, but his attack on the DIA chief tipped the scales. The DIA has recently weighed in forcefully on the intelligence scandal over Iraq's AWOL WMDs. The DIA, in particular, attacked Ahmad Chalabi, Perle's friend, who is the leader of the Iraqi National Congress—and whose bogus, lying defectors were responsible for misleading the U.S. intelligence community, including the DIA.

link:

http://tompaine.com/blog.cfm/ID/10000

Stay tuned, folks! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yesssssssssssssssssssss
More....more....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought he quit so he could speak freely w/o hurting Bush

Doesn't he have a book or two to sell?

As an independent, he can sell his books and be an attack dog for the administration, w/o the administration having to claim ownership of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow that's exactly what his resignation letter said
and since we know what an honest and unstanding fella he is.....

visit this site

www.get a clue.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you don't think he's an attack dog?
you think he's going to shrink away quietly?

I.have.a.clue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ah yes, let's review that back-dated resignation letter
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/special_packages/iraq/8041519.htm

(Mods: I believe it is acceptable to post this in full)

February 18, 2004

The Secretary of Defense
The Pentagon

Dear Mr. Secretary,

Thank you for finding time to see me on February 10. As I said then, the meeting of the Defense Policy Board would be my last, after 17 years of continuous membership under both Democratic and Republican administrations. It was a great privilege to serve on the DPB, but never more so than during your leadership. You have been open to ideas from all members of the group, challenging conventional wisdom and accepted doctrine and examining complex policy issues with great care, wisdom and courage.

Since there is bound to be speculation about my departure from the DPB, I thought I would put what I said to you in writing.
Despite heated disclaimers, my membership on the defense policy board has led many people to see my articles, books and television appearances to associate my views with those of the administration or the Department of Defense. This results partly from a misunderstanding about the role and nature of the Defense Policy Board, exacerbated by the controversy surrounding policies I have advocated as a private citizen. A television viewer or newspaper reader, accustomed to zoning boards, school boards and appeal boards, is likely to think that the Defense Policy Board actually makes decisions, and that a member of it must be in a position to speak authoritatively about administration policy. The fact that the Defense Policy Board is not a decision making body but is simply a forum enabling the Secretary of Defense to hear a variety of opinions and observations (often opposed to one another) is simply not understood by the general public.

We are now approaching a long presidential election campaign, in the course of which issues on which I have strong views will be widely discussed and debated. I would not wish those views to be attributed to you or the President at any time, and especially not during a presidential campaign. This is particularly true now since I have just published a book that calls for far reaching reform of government departments responsible for combating terrorism. Many of the ideas in that book are controversial and I wish to be free to argue them without those views or my arguments getting caught up in the campaign.

So it is with gratitude for the opportunity to serve the Department of Defense that I wish to resign from membership on the Defense Policy Board.

With admiration for your service to the nation and the cause of freedom, I remain, sincerely yours,

Richard Perle

===

Ah, that closing statement "the cause of freedom" just gives me goosebumps. /sarcasm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, oh. It's the $3 million dollars that will REALLY be a problem...
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 08:37 PM by htuttle
(Cue theme from the 'La Traviata')
PERLE: Dick, you asked to speak to me?
CHENEY: I've come upon some disturbing news. It seems you've been taking some income from Hollinger without giving the family it's fair share.
PERLE: No way, Dick! I would never do something like that...
(WHACK! CHENEY SLAPS PERLE)
CHENEY: Don't lie! You steal from me?
PERLE: No, Dick..
CHENEY: I treat you like a son, and you take money out of the mouths of my wife and children?
PERLE: No way, Dick!
CHENEY: I've always taken care of you Richard, like a son.
PERLE: Taken care of me. Did you ever think about that -- did you ever once think about that. Send Richard off to do this -- send Richard off to do that! Let Richard to take care of some Mickey Mouse night club somewhere! Send Richard to pick somebody up at the airport!
CHENEY: That's the way Leo Strauss wanted it.
PERLE: It ain't the way I wanted it! I can handle things I'm smart -- not like everyone says -- not dumb, smart and I want respect!
CHENEY: Richard you're nothing to me now -- you're not a brother, you're not a friend, I don't want to know you or what you do -- I don't want to see you at the hotels -- I don't want you near my house -- you understand.
CHENEY WALKS OFF, STOPS TO SPEAK TO OTTO REICH:
CHENEY: I don't want anything to happen to him while Reagan is still alive, understand?
REICH NODS, CHENEY WALKS OUT

Apologies to Mario Puzo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Brilliant
Hat's off to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. ROFLMAO! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. So the initial story wasn't true?
I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. You mean Perle lied?
We're shocked. SHOCKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Get thee back to Hell, Demon...
So, the "Prince of Darkness" fell from grace. How prophetic. Maybe Mel should make a movie about this..."The Passion of Perle."

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. One movie where I WOULD
pay to see someone flogged for 2 hours!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ahhh. How sweet it is.
Hope he cops a fast plea before the GE.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Somebody call Tweety, Wolfie and O'Lielly
and pass the popcorn!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC