Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slaughter--Why Why was it necessary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:36 AM
Original message
Slaughter--Why Why was it necessary?
Bush invaded Iraq a nation known to be unarmed. No planes. No tanks.

The target was SADDAM!

Please inform me why it was necessary to go into cities all over Iraq And kill thousands of innocents if Saddam was the target and known to be in Baghdad.

Why not go to Baghdad, surround it, and get Saddam.

Recall Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld speaking about "Shock and Awe".

It was to display our well known air power.

It was to scare other nations in the area.

It was to make me puke.It was so terrible. So inhumane.

What is wrong with our nation that we will tolerate such killing?
clarence swinney burlington nc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes but Iraqis aren't real people like us Amuricans.
Who cares we kill 10,000 or so civilians with our shock-and-awe? We gave them freedom- they better damn well appreciate it! (Sarcasm alert!)

I agree with you. Our media has been AWOL in covering the number of dead civilians, many of them children. But if the media did do their job, I believe many Americans would just shrug and say "Oh well- better them than us." It makes me sick to my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoedogg Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Most people wouldn't accept this....
...that's why the civilian death tolls are never reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hell, they don't even report our casualty count
which by some conservative sources is in excess of 10000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and the slaughter of the civilians and the soldiers deaths and the
wounded wont be shown to the US public...
thats why they sneak the caskets in at night
thats why they wont allow reporters at Walter Reed
thats why the occupation has been sanitized
thats why no funerals are shown
thats why no one cares
out of sight, out of mind, out of the press.
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/wounded/gallery2.htm
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. "What is wrong with our nation?"
You had to ask......

America, imo, is like a lynch-mob these days. America perceives that we were raped on 9/11, and since then the crude frontier form of American justice - the lynch-mob - sprang into high gear.

The problem is.... the MIHOP rapist is the leader of the pack. Until such time as the truth of 9/11 comes out, the lynch-mob will rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrocks Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Manipulate
us is all they intend. America is asleep but the people are begining to stir. Now the hunt intensifies for the nations number one mass muderer (bin Laden). Why was justice delayed for those years? Simple politics. You can see it they have even planned a convention on the bones of 9/11. as if only repukes died there. parade the world trade dead but hide the iraq dead. it is so damm evil. The battle for america is upon us. Vote bush out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. The unjustified slaughter
of brown people has become the new reality show. Thugs enjoying murder from the couch. This regime must end today or America must end to protect the world from it's paranoid blood lust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Unarmed?
Give me a break!
"Why not go to Baghdad, surround it, and get Saddam."

Ask the men of the 3rd infantry, the 101st airborne or the Marine corps if Iraq was "unarmed". Seems to me that good men died fighting an "unarmed" Iraq.

I was against the war before it happened and still see no justification for it. Iraq could have been handled without American military intervention.

To say Iraq was unarmed and we could have walked up to Baghdad and took Saddam is naive.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It should have never happened and it was a waste and still is
wasting lives on both sides daily.
I spit on the comfortable cowards who sit in their leather chairs and swill brandy, or pop open beer cans on their couches as they support this invasion, and support the occupation and justify the slaughter of the kids on both sides.
In fact, I hate them for it, and hate is not a word I toss around lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. OK armed with rifles
and grenades. Maybe a few out of date scuds, if any. No air force, no navy and a meager army--most of their males were killed in the first Gulf War, and many children killed by the brutal sanctions and not growing up to be fighting men. Please--the onus is on the United STates--the superior, superior wealthy invader, superbly equipped with every known fighting instrument avialable, who waited until the UN declared there were no WMD and no weapons at all except those they were allowed under the strict regulations. The US knew what Iraq had--and bravely, ever so bravely bombed the hell out it, causing the deaths of thousandds of civilians.

Oh the humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Math
The definition of "no" tanks or planes is a little bad on the math part of the ledger. You should do some reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. 0 planes, 0 ships, Surrounded and BOMBED almost DAILY for over a DECADE
then declared unarmed in regards to WMD.

that adds up to being virtually unarmed to MOST FOLKS but some will use ANY pretex for WAR as we ALL should understand by now.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. They had planes, they had tanks
They apparently had no WMD. So what? That wasn't the comment in the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Where do you get info about planes?
I have read more than once that no planes were launched by Iraq. What is correct? Do you (or anyone else) have links about this)?

Don't know anything about tanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Iraq
We destroyed some planes on the ground, not sure about the air. I know we destroyed tanks in the trip to Baghdad. I saw some burning on CNN and they weren't ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. OK, they had planes, but didn't use them?
That squares with what I've read about none launched. I would assume they did possess planes, like almost any other country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. They may have launched some
They did periodically before the war just to antagonize our fighter pilots. But mostly, the head of their air force sat out the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. 0 planes 0 ships 0 WMDs = UNARMED
that were combat ready... the hulks rusting in their hangers don't count ESPECIALLY if they can't even fly if they wanted to.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Can we avoid this endless BS?
They had tanks. They had planes. They had no WMD. Nor did I support the attack. But I do like keeping the record straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. headline: "Missing Iraqi air force turns up"
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 12:57 PM by Minstrel Boy


Washington — Some of Iraqi's missing air force has turned up down below.

Search teams, some hunting for Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, found dozens of fighter jets from Iraq's air force buried beneath the sands, U.S. officials say.

At least one Cold War-era MiG-25 interceptor was found when searchers saw the tops of its twin tail fins poking up from the sands, one Pentagon official familiar with the hunt said. He said search teams have found several MiG-25s and Su-25 ground attack jets buried at al-Taqqadum air field west of Baghdad.

Iraq's air squadrons were a no-show during the war, and U.S. military officials supposed their pilots stayed grounded because they believed they were overmatched by U.S. and British air power.

Various officials differed in opinion as to whether the buried aircraft could ever fly again. Many of the planes were buried intact with minimal efforts to protect them from the sand.

http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030801.wiraq0801/BNStory/International/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. they had planes that couldn't fly, something to do with an EMBARGO
and we knew it...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. They had planes. They chose not to fly.
Something having to do with fear of being shot down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckeye1 Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why didn't Dean stop it!
He let us down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. Cause Uncle Bill Bush needed more money
All in the(Profiteering, First) Family

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. They also could have nabbed Koresh
when he went to the store to buy milk.

Shock and Awe is what the Beast needs to control us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. This is apparently what the military wanted to do, nab Saddam quick...
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 12:47 PM by Pobeka
I did not see it but I heard frontline had a show on this just last week, which purports the military wanted to do a quick paratroop, paratank type operation, surrounding Saddam's known hideouts and very quickly severe Saddams's operations and put his whole administration in jail.

On edit: -- It was Rumsfield, Cheney et. al. that forced the slow march to Bahgdad and the shock and awe. I'll bet Haliburton, Brown & Root, and Bechtel made a lot more money the way it was implemented vs. a quick capture of Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Schok and aww is ke-wel
"Recall Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld speaking about "Shock and Awe"."

drool.

"What is wrong with our nation that we will tolerate such killing?"

picks nose. Nods head vigorously. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC