Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More "pre-empting".. U.S. to beef up military presence in Africa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 08:34 AM
Original message
More "pre-empting".. U.S. to beef up military presence in Africa
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 08:35 AM by SoCalDem
http://www.airforcetimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2684344.php
U.S. to beef up military presence in Africa
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — The United States is scaling up its military presence in Africa as concern mounts over terrorist threats — both immediate and future — on the continent, the deputy head of American forces in Europe said Friday. (more)


February 27, 2004

U.S. to beef up military presence in Africa

By Alexandra Zavis
Associated Press

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa —

The United States is scaling up its military presence in Africa as concern mounts over terrorist threats — both immediate and future — on the continent, the deputy head of American forces in Europe said Friday. “The threat is not weakening, it is growing,” Air Force Gen. Charles Wald said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press from Luanda, Angola. “We can’t just sit back and let it grow.”

....snip.....

The European Command oversees U.S. military activities in Africa excluding the Horn, site of a U.S. counterterrorism effort for northeast Africa and Yemen. Africa is a growing strategic interest to the United States because of its terror links and its oil, which is seen as a possible alternative to Middle East fuel.

....snip....

U.S. forces have also negotiated access to a number of sites, including airstrips in Angola and Gabon, that can be used for stopovers, refueling, or to position troops and equipment. Wald said this will allow U.S. forces to respond with light, mobile troops — whether for peacekeeping, crisis response or a specific terrorist threat. “We’re actually going to get more capability with less force because of our ability to move around fast,” he said.

...snip...

Wald’s trip includes stops in regional military powers Nigeria and South Africa; oil-rich Angola, Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe; and Algeria and Niger, whose vast desert expanses are seen as a potential haven for terrorists. ...snip....“We are going to do business differently,” Wald said. “Waiting for a crisis to occur just isn’t the way to do business any more.”

...snip....

The United States is helping train and equip four Sahara nations — Mali, Niger, Mauritania and Chad — to better guard their porous borders against terrorists, arms and other trafficking. There are also agreements to conduct exercises and training in Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco, Wald said. Further south, the United States wants to protect oil supplies in the Gulf of Guinea, where it gets 15 percent of its oil. There is also concern that Africa’s major humanitarian crises could develop into security threats for the United States and Europe.

...snip....

“Africa, we all know, has to work itself out of this situation, which is going to take time,” he said. “In the meantime, we have to respond to some specific threats.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its amazing how "terrorists" sprout up where there is oil....
:eyes:

Instead of just stating openly that they need to preserve the
strategic links to important natural resources, they come out and
invent shit like "terrori links"...

Idiots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish we'd ever learn the lesson about beefing up groups with weapons
*shrugs*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. what f*cking troops???
we dont have any anywhere to use we have already used them all up.
In the meantime, the never ending oil wars continue, and our kids are sitting ducks.
and on top of that, no one is saying HEY WE ARE TOO GODDAMNED DEPENDENT ON OIL YOU ASSHOLES
get the f*cking oil lobbyists and CEOs OUT of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. There are terrorists in Africa
but Bush is blind to them. The Lords Resistance Army is surely a terrorist organisation (massacring 200 refugees is terror by anyone's definition). Yet there's no mention of Uganda in the article. Could this be because it doesn't have any natural resources the USA wants now? Or could it be because:
"The group professes to wanting Uganda to be ruled according to the Biblical 10 Commandments." (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3185352.stm)
Nutters claiming to be Christian don't get as much attention as nutters claiming to be Muslim, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. As long as it's black people killing black people,
Edited on Sun Feb-29-04 03:03 AM by SoCalDem
and there is no oil being spilled, Bush is not interested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. there is/sporadically is a US military advisory presence in Uganda...
...along with UK and Russia. Seen 'em with my own eyeballs. The US - I don't know if it's sporadic or ongoing - I'd speculate ongoing.

The Bush misunderstimadministration is not blind to the LRA. The US charge d'affairs routinely calls their leader "a mad dog". However, "not being blind" and "doing something about the situation" are two completely different animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. This news is making me VERY quesy...it's
time to call that group for conscientious objectors for my teen grandsons sake???????
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC