Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should second generation Americans be allowed to run for president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:37 AM
Original message
Should second generation Americans be allowed to run for president?
Edited on Fri Feb-27-04 05:42 AM by _Jumper_
Many second generation Americans are loyal to a furrin country. One of the key arguments against allowing immigrants to run is that they may be loyal to a furrin government. If that truly is the reason one opposes letting them run then it is logical for them to oppose second generation Americans running. If you somehow feel that second generation Americans should be allowed to run, please explain why you think they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I feel your pain
Cognitive dissonance is a very troubling thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What the poster means is, this is getting old
And for what it's worth, Ralph Nader was born to immigrant parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Then why did he or she choose to read the thread?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. According to my US Constitution...
...Native-born citizens (2nd generation or later) of the US are elligible to run for the presidency, so long as they're 35 years of age, a current citizen, and have been for the previous 14 years. If there was any hint the person in question were truly "loyal" to another country, they'd likely never even make it the level of a nominee, much less win the presidency.

Obviously, unless an Amendment is passed, Gov. AH-nold will never be president, but any child he has here would have a chance per the Constitution. This seems a good enough setup to me (in theory...ignoring for a moment an idiot like Bush the Younger rising to power): the USC sets the initial guidelines, the voting US public decides who can have a shot at it and who hasn't a chance in Hell.

It really comes down to what you mean by loyal. Perhaps if you define it, we could better answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Response
"If there was any hint the person in question were truly "loyal" to another country, they'd likely never even make it the level of a nominee, much less win the presidency."

Exactly! That is why immigrants should be allowed to run too.

I will not define loyal. I will allow those that cite it as a reason for opposing giving immigrants the right to run for the presidency to define it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good enough response for me...
Edited on Fri Feb-27-04 06:46 AM by DRoseDARs
Though I disagree about allowing 1st generation immigrants the option to run for president. Think of it as letting them get acclimated to the culture and raising their children in it so that the childern are < tired cliche >"red-blooded americans"< /tired cliche >. Nothing wrong with keeping the cultural of your homeland (though, the politics are perhaps a different issue) alive and well within your own home and community, but a president must have a firm first-hand exposure to this country's culture first and foremost.

I don't know, perhaps that's a weak position to try to defend, but it remains that I'm not comfortable with altering that part of the USC. 2nd generation and beyond is ok by me, first generation isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. What about those that come here when they are very young?
Such as under 5 years old?

I disagree with you but you are entitled to your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, lines have to be drawn...
...Even if the visibility is hazy. Ce la vie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. If they weren't born here, they can never be president
Never.

That's the constitution, bud. I do not believe you will ever get support to change that one.

IMO, suggesting that it's okay to amend the constitution to remove this prohibition is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Equal rights are idiotic?
Sorry, I will not idly accept second-class citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. It's not a question of equal rights
Nice strawman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yes it is
If one group does not have the right to run for the two highest offices in the land they do not have rights equal to what those that can run have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. No, it's not
This nation does not even have to allow immigrants to become citizens.

We will never allow foreign born people to become president. Nor should we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. How is that not second-class citizenship?
What other rights should furriners be deprived of? Why let them run for other high offices? Why let them serve on the Senate Intelligence Committee? They may be terraists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. Youy don't like it, you can leave
That's the way it works here. I do not want to see the United tates make the fatal mistakes a certain south American nation made with this.

I will vehemently oppose all attempts to alter the constitution in this way. If you consider it second class citizenship, I do not care.

No foreign born individual should EVER be allowed to be our president. No amount of cliche's being pulled out will change my mind on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. BTW, running for president is not a right
It is a privelage.

If it were a right, an 18 year old should be able to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. 2nd generation would be eligible.
they would be BORN here if they were 2nd generation :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Response
The issue is loyalty. If loyalty is the reason to proscribe immigrants from running why allow second generation Americans?

That is not true. Second generation Americans are those who are the children of immigrants to America and whose home has always been America. I am second generation. My parents came here in the 70's. However, my mother was visting a furrin country when I was born and only my father was a citizen at the time. Had both of them been citizens I would have been an automatic citizen. Due to this quirk, I am inelgible. Does this make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You are the exception to the rule
"Most" 2nd gen would be native born..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Am I a terraist because of that?
Why should I not have the same right to run for president as other Americans? Would you vote for Shrub over me? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
44. Consular Report of Birth Abroad
Consular Report of Birth Abroad
A document issued by an American embassy or consulate reflecting the facts of a birth abroad of a child acquiring U.S. citizenship at birth through one or both parents. This record, also known as an FS-240, along with the Certification of Birth, DS-1350, are acceptable as proof of birth and U.S. citizenship for all legal purposes.

http://travel.state.gov/consular_records.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Cool, then some billionaire media mogul from Australia
could come here and become president easily because he owns the media and has the money.

:eyes:

That's what this is all about, not getting Swarzenegger or Albright the ability to run. It's all about getting a certain media mogul the right to become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. How would he be worse than people like Shrub and Raygun????
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. You're not convincing me
And I call my Congressperson and Senators regularly on issues, including this one.

I will NEVER support amending the constitution to change this. NEVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. You are constitutionally ineligible to be president
and I would never want you to be president because of that fact.

IMO, you are a first generation immigrant regardless of any argument you make to the contrary. If you were not born here, you should never be allowed to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Look up the definition of second generation
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. No matter how you feel about it
I consider you first generation because you were not born on U.S. soil. I could never support amending the constitution to allow you to be president. If such an amendment were ever ratified, I would refuse to vote for any candidate who was not born on U.S. soil, you included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #33
50. John McCain was born in Panama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Canal Zone is the US
My brother was born there as well and had dual citizenship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Yep, same holds true for American hospitals at overseas bases
I've known many military brats who were born overseas who would still be qualified to run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
39. Interesting... _Jumper_ please read this and respond
I was under the impression that children born of USAmerican citizens (who have not lost their citizenship) WHILE VISITING a foreign nation are still considered natural citizens and therefore eligable.

Is this incorrect?

Hold on, looking in my old civics book, it says this:

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Citizenship by Birth to an American Parent
Another method of automatic citizenship is birth to an American parent or parents. Thie principle is called jus sanguinis (YOOS SAHN-gwuh-nuhs), which means the "law of blood."

The rules governing jus sanguinis can be very complicated. If an individual is born in a foreign country and both parents are United States citizens, the child is a citizen, provided on requirement is met. One of the parents must have been a legal resident of the United States at some point in his or her life. If only one of the parents is an American citizen, however, that parent must have lived in the United States or an American possession for at least 10 years, 5 of which had to occur after the age of 14.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

How does that factor into your citizenship _Jumper_ ? If you're a "native-born" citizen under these rules, I see no reason why you shouldn't be eligable, or perhaps I'm missing part of the story.

Inquiring minds want to know... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. My mother lived here for only six years at the time
If she had lived here for tens years I wouldn't be considered a threat. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. At the time the rule was written, we were worried about...
...the European nobility (re: the British) meddling in our affairs.

Damn you and your blue blood, _Jumper_ ! :grr:



;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. No one considers you a "threat"
Your mother left the country before you were born.. she was not a US citizen.. Therefore you are not either (unless you have been naturalized)...but in any case, due to an "accident" of birthplace, you are not eligible..

If she had stayed til you were born, you would have been a citizen, regardless of her status..

Technically, the vietnamese kids fathered by US soldiers, have the same claim as you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. so if that one "detainee" who was born in Louisiana had just moved
back here for a few years he could have become President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
54. We look forward to your run for the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. SoCalDem, your sig pic is extremely disturbing
:scared:



;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. It made me laugh when I saw it
Edited on Fri Feb-27-04 07:08 AM by SoCalDem
Reminded me of Tom Delay...aka the bug-man :)

In fact //I just changed the caption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. Suddenly I hear cockroaches scurrying about...
...*squish*...Eeewwww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. We should NEVER allow foreign born citizens to run
Period.

No changing the constitution over this. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. What about the 2nd generation?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Second generation, by definition, have met the requirements
They were actually BORN here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. False
Read post #11. I am shocked that you think that Shrub is more qualified to be president than I, a fellow progressive and DU'er.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Yes, if you were not born here you are FIRST GENERATION
and yes, Shrub is more qualified than you because he was actually BORN here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. That is not the definition
SYLLABICATION: sec·ond-gen·er·a·tion
PRONUNCIATION: sknd-jn-rshn
ADJECTIVE: 1. Of or relating to a person or persons whose parents are immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. But if you are not born here, you are the immigarant
regardless of whether or not your parents are also immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. History is on their side
Andrew Jackson's parents came from Ireland, and some even say he was born on the boat on the way over. Chet Arthur's father, a minister, sometimes lived in Canada.

If one is going to be picky about genealogy, maybe it would be best if we only allowed Native Americans to run for office....and knowing some cool Natives, that might not be such a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. I don't know of any country with such a provision
It is xenophobic and pointless. The future is on my argument's side. In the future countries that believe in equal rights will elect furrin-born leaders and Americans will see that and realize it isn't a disaster.

Note: Canada already has but the world was not as tied together than as it is now. When it happens in the future Americans will know about it and see that leader on their TV and computer screens, the front page of their newspapers and realize it is not the end of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
30. Second generation americans can run ...
because they were born here and you know that.

What inane research do you have to back up that second generation americans are loyal to another country???

My mother and father were second generation americans and they didn't even know any relatives living in their parent's former country...their parents had left and never looked back.

However that said.. I do not believe foreigners should be allowed to become president....no way no how...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. That isn't the issue
The issues is whether they should be allowed to run.

I said that SOME second generation Americans are loyal to a furrin country. That is a fact, just like some first generation Americans are loyal to a furrin country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. I read the threads above and so I have a question...why did your mom leave
the country while pregnant?

Technically if your mother was concerned about you becoming a candidate for president then she should have come over here to have you....I would assume she read the constitution before becoming a citizen...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. It was irrational
She had two miscarriages here and felt that if she was with her family it wouldn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
35. Only if they immigrate AFTER the amendment is passed.
Just as the two-term amendment only applied to presidents elected after it was passed.

Of course, with that qualification, it won't get any Republican support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC