|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:24 AM Original message |
Is Justess O'Connor having a conscience attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. Conscience attack? No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 09:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
24. O'Connor is a coup leader, she seems pleased with herself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 10:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. Is there some evidence that she has a conscience? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HydroAddict (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. "Fat Tony and Slappy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. well, you have to admit that it's pretty amazing . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. That's what I mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. This is the opportunity of a lifetime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pushed To The Left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 02:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Yes!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
turnhardleft (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 07:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 03:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Supreme Court Justices... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Question: When Renquist steps down, who determines the next CJ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. The President appoints the CJ. Need not be a current court J.(NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:58 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. So theoretically, if * wins in November, Roy Moore could be CJ, bumped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Yeah, theoretically. Abe Fortas was the last attempted "bump". (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. no_hypocrisy...OMFG! that is the SCARIEST fucking thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. *NO* liberal will be confirmed by the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 09:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Unless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Even then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 10:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
30. You think a Republican Senate would allow it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lcordero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
6. I doubt that it is the same republican party that she was a part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cardlaw (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. After Bush v. Gore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastLiberal in PalmSprings (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 02:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. None of the Justices want their legacy to be 'Bush v. Gore' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. The Felonious Five Really Revealed Themselves in 2000, No? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomUser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. It's because of the 2000 aftermath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastLiberal in PalmSprings (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 02:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You beat me to it, RU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 04:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Well, they can wait till after the next election, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Excellent point most well made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
27. Right on the button n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
14. Great Points...Here's One More... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
16. It musta been that nasty letter I sent to her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
32. LOL! no conscience--she'll wait for a "clean" election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC