Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How are we to believe in the accuracy of events from 2000 years ago...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
waterman Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:10 PM
Original message
How are we to believe in the accuracy of events from 2000 years ago...
when we can't even get answers to these things that happen right in our face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have a book that tells us what happened...
...and the book absolutely cannot be wrong. It is the word of God after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Did God have ...
good handwriting. I think that is important.

This book was written by humans who were interested in quelling their enemies by making them believe that they working in the name of an all-knowing diety.

If God was real there would be no need for Religion.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Blasphemer! Heretic!
Get thee hence! How dare you question the word of God, as transcribed and edited, by his very own, self proclaimed, representatives on Earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Well, not all Christians believe in inerrancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. You mean Homer? but that's more than 2,000 years ago...
Oh, wait - not that book, you mean Confucius' Analects, right? Not too exciting, but at least you get an idea what was going on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's called faith
and I have more faith in what happened 2000 years ago than with what is happening with the current administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And I have more faith in a shadow
On the moon. Sorry, had to ref that one. Don't worry if you don't know the quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Didn't Know That One:
"The Church says that the earth is flat, but I know that it is round, for I have seen the shadow on the moon, and I have more faith in a shadow than in the Church. " Ferdinand Magellan

Too bad there are no 200-year-old shadows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoedogg Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Faith
"Faith is what allows you to believe what you otherwise couldn't believe if you was in your right mind."

-- Archie Bunker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
einniv Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Unfortunately it doesn't get us very far.
Why should I not have faith in Allah or the teachings of Buddah.
How about Vishnu and Osiris and Zeus?
That is one brick wall I have never been able to get past regarding "faith"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good analogy
and you're right.

That movie is no more accurate than a movie, book, or play, I would write about it. The only thing Mel can accurately say is that "Passion" is his interrpretation, his understanding of what he's studied. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. lets see....the Dead Sea Scrolls perhaps? The Septuagint?
read about them. That is, if you really want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. How do you know those references are accurate and true?
How do you know the person writting them wasn't doing so with personal purposes afore thought. Or even that he wasn't drafting an action adventure novel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. My daddy always said that the bible was a collection
of contemporary novels of those times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. There is a theory
That the earliest gospel (Mark) was actually a reworking of Homer's stories (Illiad & Odysseus) reworking the long suffering protagonist as a pacifist instead of an aggressor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. There is actually very little to nothing...
...in the Bible that is original. This includes the death and resurrection of Christ. The Celtic tribes had a similar story, as did the Greeks, and the Egyptians.

Had a fundie once argue with me that there was no other religion that had a God who had died and been resurrected. He was stunned when I started going into great detail on examples proving his statement false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serenades Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. . . .
Doesn't accuracy depend on perspective? We both could go to a concert and have totally different opinions of what happened. I could think it was great, the crowd was into it, and the beautiful people flashing us were heavenly. However, you could think that it was violent, loud, obnoxious, and crazy where people with low morals go to indulge in their stupidity.

But I understand what you're trying to say. We can't get an accurate account of what's going on in Iraq in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. We would both agree
That concert did occur. Details may vary but the basic experience would be similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. We don't have to believe in the absolute accuracy...
Edited on Thu Feb-26-04 12:32 PM by TreasonousBastard
of every event in order to gain understanding.

Rationalism has its limits, too.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
F.Gordon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. God sent Mel Gibson back in time
Mel videotaped the whole thing. Think there's a movie about it. Not sure....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tobius Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Scorcese had his interpretation:
"The Last Temptation of Christ"- in it he portrayed a sex scene with Mary Magdalane,
there didn't seem to be the same uproar from the left as with the latest movie. At that time the right was up in arms.

Objectively looking at reponses to common culture can be quite revealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
einniv Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thats because he captured the message of Christ
Edited on Thu Feb-26-04 01:04 PM by einniv
not just a series of beatings.

Here is my review where I make some comparisons of the 2 films.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x807380

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. I want to know the Administrative Assistant's name who transcribed
the exchange between God and Adam.

You never hear about him. (Remember, Woman wasn't created yet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC