Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

unfair, ILLEGAL efforts by NYT forced gay marriage upon Massachusetts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:13 PM
Original message
unfair, ILLEGAL efforts by NYT forced gay marriage upon Massachusetts
This is from a Conservative Newsgroup that I receive emails from. What a sick, twisted, unhinged bunch of fuckers.

:puke:

They are launching an attack on the New York Times-we should let them know that this is astroturf.

------------------------------------------------------

To: Conservative Friends

From: Attorney J. Edward Pawlick

Re: Hurt NY Times and Protect
Your State from Gay Marriage

Dear Fellow Conservative:


You're probably unaware that unfair and ILLEGAL efforts by the New York Times Company forced gay marriage upon Massachusetts. My new book, hot off the press last week, clearly documents their scheme.

This is a conservative dream, but we must move quickly. We have an opportunity to make everybody concede that the New York Times has morphed into an extremist, bigoted, biased paper. Even my liberal friends were distraught when they read proofs of the book and saw their icon being destroyed before their eyes. They were dismayed. But you will be very happy to see the undeniable evidence!!!

The Times managed to wiggle out last summer when the Jayson Blair scandal took them to their knees. The latest news will be the coup de grace.

Their plan is for Massachusetts to be first in a strategy to spread gay marriage across the entire nation! This fascinating story will provide you the information you need to explain why the New York Times empire is out to destroy the traditional family -- in cooperation with the most extreme of the feminists and homosexual activists.

For example, the Massachusetts judge who finally imposed gay marriage last week, Margaret Marshall, is the wife of the Times radical columnist Anthony Lewis. She gained office in 1999, only after intense backing from the Times’ subsidiary, the Boston Globe.

As attorney for Mass. Citizens for Marriage since its founding in 2000, I watched in disbelief as the Times and the Globe lied and libeled the group 16 times in order to stop their Constitutional Amendment from going to a referendum in 2004. That vote of the people would have prevented Marshall from imposing gay marriage or civil unions. I was before the state Supreme Court arguing about marriage four times in recent months and deserve some credit for the three dissenting judges, who were brilliant!

Even so, I didn't understand a lot of the puzzle until last spring, because I didn't know anything about the family who owns the Times. Nobody can deny any of my facts because nobody knows better than I what happened in this state in the last four years. As far as the Times is concerned, I did not discover the dots. I only connected them from what is revealed in the many excellent books about the paper. The man who bought the newspaper in 1896 was an honorable person who built it into a national treasure before dying in 1935. Since his death, it has been run like a family shoe store by the Sulzberger family with everyone helping to decide the editorial policy. Everything bounced quietly along until the great grandson of the founder, Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr., grabbed control of the media giant in the 1980s.

There is no better way to describe Sulzberger than the way his family does: "WEIRD."

Even his father hesitated to name him as head of the conglomerate. Since his teenage years, he's had a fascination with homosexuality. He says that his ancestors, including his father, were all homophobes and he is out to erase that. He is using the Times to accomplish his personal goal. He lied and betrayed his father many times on that issue.

Do not take my word for the fact that this message will shake our entire nation. Read the facts yourself to see how Sulzberger lied and libeled in order to get his way, like a spoiled child having a tantrum.

The story is compelling and fascinating. The book is guaranteed FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR. If you wish to return it for any reason, we will refund the entire price you paid -- plus shipping.

This is the best chance we've had in years to crumble the liberal media. We must stop wringing our hands and take the offense. Let's do it!!!

Sincerely,
Attorney J. Edward Pawlick


P.S. I was founder and CEO of Lawyers Weekly Publications, one of the most respected publishers of legal newspapers in the nation, with papers in seven states and a national paper, reaching over 30% of the practicing lawyers across the nation, with a staff of 40 lawyers and 80 others, before selling it in 1997.

P.P.S. All profits from the sale of the book, will be used exclusively to spread this message to more people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. shill alert
Can conservatives ever voice an opinion without shilling their book to back it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Really Like His "PS"...
Like, that really makes him legit. Gee whiz Rose..."fuckers?" OOOh, the language. Hee Hee Hee. These people make my skin crawl. What the fuck is their REAL issue? I find myself having arguments with them in my sleep, while walking my dogs, cooking dinner, etc. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. The author sure likes to use hyperbole. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Typical Repuke, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC