Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good lord, I believe this man is presidential timber!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Paradox_Mystery Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:43 AM
Original message
Good lord, I believe this man is presidential timber!
If I ever have a chance to vote Gavin Newsom for president, I will consider myself and this country lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I couldn't agree more.
I can't wait until he kicks that weenie ahnold weinerschnitzel out of the governors house, and then on to the White House. I think that this is a shot across the bow, that the liberal left is about to come screaming back with Newsome as it's Captain.

Free at last, free at last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought that about Dean the first time I knew he existed
when he was Governor of Vermont and he talked about the need for a federal health care program. I said to myself. I want this man to be president. Unfortunately now I know these people who give us hope can never be president. I still weep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. for violating the law?
Newsome is just like Roy Moore down here in Alabama. Both are gaining fame and power from purposefully disobeying laws. I agree with Newsome's supposed aims, but he is breaking the law just like Moore. He's a demagogue just like Moore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's standing up for human rights as they are written
in the California State Constitution. The grays in Sacramento have forgotten that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Newsom's stand is not like Roy Moore's
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 02:03 AM by CreekDog
Newsom's gay marriage stand:
1) Newsom says that this action is taken because doing otherwise would violate the state constitution

2) Newsom says that he will obey court action and decisions on the matter

Moore's 10 commandments stand:
1) Moore knew that the Constitution prohibited his actions and did it anyway

2) Moore disobeyed a court order even to the point of being removed from office for it.

===============================

Before this action, I thought Gavin Newsom was making decisions and showing that he will be one of our great mayors. After this decision, I'm thinking that even more strongly. I'm a fan.

One example of Gavin Newsom is his reaction to a string of murders in the predominantly black and predominantly poor Bayview neighborhood. Gavin started showing up without cameras or press at the crime scenes, asking questions and talking to people in the neighborhood. When he was criticized for "meddling" , his response was that his mistake was not being there sooner to face the problem and get involved to solve it.

This guy is so damn smart, I can't wait for the day when he can run for higher office. He will scare the sh*t out of Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If he didn't issue license he would ALSO be violating the law
The State Constitution. So he chose one to apply/disobey and off we go to the courts. I admire and support his courageous, and righteous stand for fairness and equality. He could just as easily have chosen the dark side and violated the Constitution - it would have been easier, and much less principled.

He is truly presidential material, of that I have no doubt.

"FUCK BUSH" Buttons, Stickers & Magnets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Newsome has legal reasons
Which is why the city of San Fransisco is suing the state of California. In other words, the California Constitution says that gay marriage should be legal, even if a referendum made it illegal.

Moore on the other hand, has no legal reasons, only theocratic ones.

There's a world of difference between what Newsome is doing and what Moore did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradox_Mystery Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. what about the constitution?
He is disobeying laws that (I believe and pray) will be overturned as unconstitutional. There are multiple Supreme court precedents for overturning the Defense of Marriage act( and the others), such as Loving v Virginia, where the court overturned a ban on interracial marriages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Demogoguery = Lawbreaking?
Martin Luther King is a demogogue ... so say the King-haters.

Roy Moore did more than just break the law. He played the "persecuted Christian" role to the hilt. I doubt that Newsome would try for personal pity. He would, I hope, try to engineer the situation to make the anti-Gay politicians -- like Arnie has become, alas -- look like the bigots they are.

Civil Disobedience requires violating unjust laws. Demogoguery does not. And Roy Moore crossed the line when he turned his crusade into a junkyard passion play.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Okay, maybe I'm wrong
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 02:06 AM by syrinx9999
I shouldn't have commented on this issue, perhaps. I don't know that much about it. But mayors are supposed to uphold the laws not subvert them. If Newsome is not subverting the laws of California, I take back my comments, and apologize. But demagogues exist on the left as well as the right.

And I have no problem with gay people getting married. It's really the least of my concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. He is up holding the law.
he is up holding the states constitution which superceedes unconstitutional laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He's upholding the laws against the Republicans who are
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 02:23 AM by Cleita
subverting them. This is more than gay people. This is about taking our country back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sacman Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. to hell
with the rule of law----just ignore that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawn Donating Member (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Standing up for the civil rights of fellow Americans.
Perhaps one needs to challenge established laws to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. you'll notice
That the law you're refering to is being challenged by the City of San Francisco because it violates the California State Constitution. When all is said and done, that law will probably be struck down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's time for the "popular" Democratic candidates to stand up.
By being vague or agreeing to the second-class status of civil unions, they really show their true colors. And they’re voting history just backs it up. Pander. (Elect me.) Pander. (Elect me.) Pander. (Please, contribute to my campaign.)

If Kerry and Edwards really regret their votes on the Patriot Act, IWR, etc. they should really get out and support equal rights for ALL citizens. They can only be duped so many times before we have to assume they’re stupid or there’s something else going on.

I guess they figure there are no gay Vietnam vets or poor mill workers. And the straight people that see the inequity must be a small minority. Yeah, we rolled over for Clinton’s DOMA and DADT and we all got an extramarital BJ from an intern in return. They should’t assume that ABB is the only option for me. (It was until now that the gloves have been tossed off.)

I’m considering Almost Any Country But USA. (AACBUSA) Well, if they’ll take me, considering how much the rest of the world hates us. I hate us now, too. I love our constitution, but I am preparing to outsource my citizenship over this bullshit.

I'll really be able to vote my conscience. I want to know if they care or even have one.

Looks like Newsome is my write-in choice at present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. agree
keep an eye on Newsom in the future, he might just be on a presidential/primary ballot at some point.

the other one to watch is Warner, Gov. of Virginia - don't know much about him, but from what I've seen/read -- I wouldn't be surprised to see his name on a presidential/primary ballot in the future

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC