|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
liberal72 (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:01 AM Original message |
O'Reilly just said . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. He should be taken off the air for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlFrankenFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Should've been taken off the air a while ago n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. good point, I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sacman (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. free speach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yes, it can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. slander is not included in free speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbyboucher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Don't bother them with details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
2. So should male judges recuse themselves from hearing cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. O'Reilly's a dick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chicago Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
5. OReilly should recuse his head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
6. Wonder how he feels about Scalia hearing the Cheney Energy case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillZBubb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
7. Does that mean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. O'REILLY Spun So Much Throughout This Show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
9. B.O. blows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. That statement is so utterly ridiculous! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbyhoffman (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. Other talk show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
12. Has OReally, Celebrity Journalist to the Stars ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
13. Shouldn't hetero judges also recuse themselves then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
20. I would guess his line of reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC