Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's revisit Harken

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:53 PM
Original message
Let's revisit Harken
and Bush's insider trading (ain't that what Martha Stewart is in trouble for?) He got an extremely wide pass for his MILITARY DESERTION for 30+ years because HE IS A BUSH. Obviously he has gotten a pass on his CORPORATE CRIMINALITY AT HARKEN BECAUSE HE IS A BUSH. Let's shorten the time line on this revelation. Contact your favorite newspaper or TV or radio reporter. Write your congressman. Take just a few moments my fellow DUers and keep the pot stirred. All we are doing is exposing the electorate to the truth. Let us all make a nike commercial this election season - JUST DO IT! Lets make the democratic nominees job an easy one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey I like it
Can be very simple and to the point "What's the difference between Bush and Stewart? and can we have the same type of investigation not the one that was claimed to have been done about bush/Harken? or is there a reason * gets a free pass like jumping ahead of 500 waiting young men to get into the guard because his name is Bush? Just wondering? Is this is what fair and balanced means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent idea. Conason's excellent Harper's article is a good intro:
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/1797_300/59086099/p1/article.jhtml?term=

NOTES ON A NATIVE SON.
Harper's Magazine, Feb, 2000, by Joe Concson, Kevin P. Phillips

I. THE GEORGE W. BUSH SUCCESS STORY
A heartwarming tale about baseball, $1.7 billion, and a lot of swell friends
By Joe Conason

<snip>

Once more, however, the Bush name seems to have provided sudden deliverance--this time in the form of a contract with the emirate of Bahrain. Until 1989 the Bahraini oil minister had been negotiating an agreement for offshore drilling with Amoco, a huge energy conglomerate with decades of worldwide experience. Those talks were abruptly broken off, supposealy because the Bahrainis had decided that a smaller firm would give their project more attention. The Bahraini officials were put in touch with Harken through a former Mobil Oil executive named Michael Ameen. At the same time, Ameen also happened to be working as a consultant to the U.S. State Department, which had assigned him to brief Charles Hostler, the newly confirmed American ambassador to Bahrain (a San Diego real estate investor who had given $100,000 to the Republican Party for the 1988 election).

These several events culminated in a January 1990 announcement that astonished oil-industry analysts: the government of Bahrain had awarded exclusive offshore drilling rights to Harken. "It was a surprise," one top analyst told Time magazine with dry understatement. Quite apart from Harken's shaky financial condition, the company had never drilled a well anywhere but Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma, and had never drilled undersea at all. So depleted of cash and so deeply in debt was Harken that the company was forced to bring in the more experienced and solvent Bass brothers as equity partners, so that construction on the $25 million project could begin.

<snip>

However it was procured, the Bahrain contract pushed up the price of Harken stock from $4.50 to $5.50 in a matter of weeks. And on June 22, 1990, six months after the contract was announced, George W. quietly sold off 212,140 shares, or two thirds of his interest, which grossed him $848,560. He used most of the proceeds to pay off the bank loan he had taken a year earlier to finance his portion of the Texas Rangers deal. A few weeks later, in early August, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Saddam's aggression drove down the share prices of every oil company doing business in the Gulf, including Harken, whose shares fell to $3.12.

By the time George W. unloaded his Harken stock in late June, diplomatic alarms had been sounding in the Bush White House about Saddam's aggressive intentions. Although there is no evidence that the president's son was tipped off about the impending Gulf crisis, he certainly had reason to know that Harken was still in trouble. He served on the company's three-member audit committee and also on a special "fairness committee" appointed that spring to consider how a corporate restructuring would affect the value of the company's outstanding shares. Two months after Bush sold the bulk of his Harken holdings, the company posted losses for the second quarter of well over $20 million and its shares fell another 24 percent; by year-end Harken was trading at $1.25.

When Bush's stock dumping was first reported by the Houston Post in October 1990, there were no accusations of insider trading. Then in April 1991 the Wall Street Journal revealed that the Securities and Exchange Commission had not been notified of his timely trade until eight months after the legal deadline. The regulatory agency commenced an investigation that concluded in 1991 with no action against George W. It was hardly a surprise. The SEC chairman at the time, Richard Breeden, was an especially ardent Bush loyalist, and the agency's general counsel was the same Texas attorney who had handled the sale of the Rangers baseball team for George W. and his partners in 1989. Bush has insisted that he didn't know about the firm's mounting losses and that his stock sell-off had been approved by Harken's general counsel.

<much more - this is a 25 page article>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. A big name reporter
has to kickstart it. The Martha Stewert tie in would be good.It would probably shock everyone to know how ignorant the press is on this story. I emailed Helon Thomas about bush* campaigning in a borrowed Enron jet. She had never heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great idea.......also thanks for the link, Stephanie
I have long thought a investigation into Harken needs to take place. It seems this was merely swept under the rug after a review by the SEC. Hopefully, someone will pick up on this and dig deeper into the illegal transactions that were going on with Bush and Harken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Harken case is worse. He was THE insider, not just a
participant in a verbal exchange that may or may not have happened. He was CEO, sat on the audit board and was privy to the shitty financials due out shortly after he sold his holdings.

I agree, now that Chimpy is being "toppled" from his pedastal, this story might stick also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Also possibly privy to Gulf War I imminence
If he was insider trading on gov't secrets, even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DifferentStrokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Worse than insider trading
was the sale of restricted stock. Bush had to get a special release from Harken's legal end.

More details about the financial dealings and extraordinary accounting here. This article links to reports about the accounting gymnastics that would be of use to an investigative reporter.

http://www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=290

Thanks so much for the Harper's article and the other comments, everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hmm, who would care about reinvestigating a 13 yr old financial deal?
Even though Shrub pocketed hundred$ of thousand$, instead of losing money, perhaps . . . oh, Mr Starr.

But it was before aWol was president . . . oh wait, nevermind.

Then again, since it involves SEC sweetheart laxity, perhaps . . . oh yea, Mr. Spitzer. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. kick for Eliot Spitzer
Our first president named Eliot? Maybe.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC