"Do You Support a Constitutional Amemdment Against Gay Marriage" (Poll)

[masmdu]

Local News poll (Greensboro, NC)

Vote in this poll

http://www.wfmynews2.com/

[WillParkinson]

1. 38% say no.

How sad for the rest of them.

[Kahuna]

2. Yes is at 68.7%. Vote now!

nt

[grandmasue]

3. Bush is Right to Ban Gay Marriage Permanently

But I can't support Kerry. Too forgetful about his past war record and position on Vietnam and the three WMD proclamations he made or signed.

Nadar seems more solid. I don't agree with all his views but he has been a rock all these years.

[PVnRT]

4. Wait

You're for Nader, but think that it's good to outlaw gay marriage?

Hmmmmmmmmm

[WillParkinson]

5. Bush is right to ban gay marriage permanently?

How could you deny someone the right to be joined with the person they love?

I hope that you never have gay friends or children because you obviously will never think of them as 'equals'.

[chiburb]

6. Gotta love that SEARCH function...

"This Democrat will never accept gay marriage.

The psychological and emotional damage to children in gay marriages presents the second worse case delivery of a gender identity crisis.

Mommies do not have penis' and Daddies do not have boobs and menstruate. Not now, not ever.

For instance, a young boy lives with two lesbians, one which he calls Daddy but his Daddy does not have a penis like he does! Who is his role model for being a man, a future daddy?

When mommy and daddy are naked, there is no physical difference. No one looks like the child! Where does this little boy fit in? Kids are not miniature adults who can reason and understand and all this does is warp his mind.

He will be teased at school and in the neighborhood, hurt by children, parents and the world, betrayed by his own "parents" and left to make sense of something that doesn't.

When his "parents" split up, as gay relations are not protected from change either, this child will be subject to other "step gay parents" coming in and out of his life. He will be at a very high risk for abuse.

While broken marriages aren't ideal either, at least they don't throw gender identity crisis into the mix.

Gay couples should not have children, nor raise children, nor adopt children. "

ON EDIT (my edit, not the above post): No wonder opinions are like assholes, at least both parties each have one of those!

[libview]

7. none of the serious dem contenders for pres support gay

marriage either.

[Kamika]

9. even if they aren't

They would never be "against" it

[youngred]

17. Kucinich does

spare me the non-serious shit

[Catholic Sensation]

10. you make it sound like everyone here would vote "no"

which ideally would be the case, but realistically isn't

I voted no. Governments shouldn't ban anything unless it has a detrimental effect on everyone (with the exception of alcohol, that should never be banned).

And to grandmasue: It's spelled Nader, not Nadar. It's awfully hard to take you seriously when you can't spell the candidate's relatively simple name correctly.

[chiburb]

11. Makes you think that maybe...

Her rant in post #6 was a cut and paste?

[chiburb]

8. Take note folks...n/t

.

[Catholic Sensation]

12. It's Greensboro anyway

anyone who lives in North Carolina knows that Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill (or the RTP) is where all the smart people in North Carolina live ;)

[ms_splash]

16. Hey, there are one or two smart people

out here in the western mountains (I no a cupple of dem)

[LynneSin]

13. Damn, the poll is from the heart of Jay-sus country

Be lucky we see 40% on that poll

:shrug:

[chiburb]

14. Props to the Mods!

Poster #3 has a new avatar in her profile...

[proud patriot]

15. Glad to help