Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oklahoma Governor Suggests Homicide for Teachers Unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:49 PM
Original message
Oklahoma Governor Suggests Homicide for Teachers Unions
Since Rod Paige's statement comparing the National Education Association to a terrorist organization is getting so much press, I thought it would be fun to reminisce about Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating's quip when he was asked how one should deal with Oklahoma's teachers union: "Homicide."

http://www.oksenate.gov/news/press_releases/press_releases_2000/PR000204.html

I know nothing about Governor Keating, but I think that statement is cool. It reminds me of Bob Dole's presidential campaign, when he tore the NEA a new one.

It wasn't enough to convince me to vote for Dole, but it was one the single most exciting statements I've ever heard a presidential candidate make.

Now, before you get all worked up and call me a violent person or a right-winger, think about this:

Washington State's Governor Gary Locke and other corporate whores have publicly talked about using our high-stakes test - the WASL - to "punish" schools and children, and I don't recall that statement creating much fuss at all.

So just to make sure I understand where you're all coming from, are you telling me that it's almost criminal to call the NEA a terrorist organization, but it's OK to use high-stakes tests to punish children?

If that's the case, then maybe the Democratic Party should split in two. Everyone who wants to protect the NEA can stay with the meanstream, and I'll join the branch that thinks children are more deserving of protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeinesRed Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm an NEA member...
and I think children are deserving of protection. What does that make me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:53 PM
Original message
It makes you a NEA member who publicly claims to care about kids.
Whether or not you do anything more than talk about it is anyone's guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeinesRed Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. wow...
never mind, not worth my time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. The debate is not about protecting the NEA
It is about labeling it a "terrorist" organization. The word terror in any form is a serious business these days and is taken seriously.... when we start calling everyone we don't like a "terrorist" than it waters down other terrorists like Ossama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. So you want to turn this into a free speech issue?
I'd be the first to admit that most Americans are stupid, but even the average dumbass who doesn't even vote probably knows that Rod Paige wasn't suggesting that the NEA is planning on destroying the Golden Gate Bridge.

I'm one of many people who have called George W. Bush a terrorist. I think corporate America in general is a terrorist state. Moreover, the NEA can indeed be likened to a terrrorist organization in that it does contribute to a lot of suffering.

On another tangent, I think it's kind of cool to sling the word "terrorist" around, mocking George Bush's gross misuse of the word. Many cartoonists and columnists agree with me.

Guard your free speech zealously; you may miss it one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ok, feel free to start a new party
That believes the NEA is a terrorist organization and advocates homicide for its members. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not an NEA member...
...and I feel that all students should be held to an acceptable standard before being allowed to graduate. What does that make me?

Yes, I know...special needs students and all. I'm talking about "normal" students.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It depends on what you mean by "held to an acceptable standard."
I think most people would agree that students should be held to an acceptable standard. But the new standards imposed by corporations are nowhere near acceptable. (Ever notice how few legislators have accepted invitations to take those cursed tests?)

Moreover, I think it's monstrously hypocritical to rant endlessly about imposing standards on teachers and students while allowing school officials to steal everything but the kitchen sink.

As a matter of fact, it reminds me of George W. Bush's much publicized determination to bring terrorists to nation while doing his level best to destroy the Constitution and our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now it's cool to call for homicide
What's next? Rounding the NEA up into concentration camps is a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's sad to hear a DUer
Advocate McCarthyism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Locking--GD rules
1. If you start a thread in the General Discussion forum, you must present your opinion in a manner that is not inflammatory, which respects differences in opinion, and which is likely to lead to respectful discussion rather than flaming. Some examples of things which should generally be avoided are: unnecessarily hot rhetoric, nicknames for prominent Democrats or their supporters, broad-brush statements about groups of people, single-sentence "drive-by" thread topics, etc.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

Note that the present tense is used about a four year old stupidity.

Also, it is against DU rules to advocate violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC