Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

did you know Smirk signed the war order in Feb. of '02 ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:49 PM
Original message
did you know Smirk signed the war order in Feb. of '02 ?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1154473,00.html

George Bush set the US on the path to war in Iraq with a formal order signed in February 2002, more than a year before the invasion, according to a book published yesterday.

-snip-

"On February 16 2002, Bush signed a secret national security council directive establishing the goals and objectives for going to war with Iraq, according to classified documents I obtained," Mr Scarborough wrote, in an account of the "global war on terrorism" as seen from the office of Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary.

The next month, he writes, the head of central command, General Tommy Franks, conducted a "major Iraq war exercise code-named "Prominent Hammer", and in April he briefed the joint chiefs of staff on the invasion plan.

-snip-

The national security council refused to comment on the book's claims about the February directive. "I don't do book reviews," a White House official said.
-snip-
----------------------------

Rumsfeld's War is by Rowan Scarborough, the Pentagon correspondent for the conservative Washington Times newspaper, which is known for its contacts in the defence department's civilian leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. where on the timeline is this
with his "haven't made my mind up" comments?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just more Bush Frauds
Reminds of the total crap of "There are no plans on the President's desk to invade Iraq".

(So the plan might be on the side table, just not on his desk...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. GOOD QUESTION?
Anyone able to pinpoint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. While we tear apart IWR votes on our own side,
the war was inevitable. No matter how we were going to war but let's tar and feather Democrats when the responsibility lies solely with the MADMEN at 1600.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Its not irrelevant, abuse of the War Powers Act = impeachment
I don't care what the makeup of Congress was the impeachment process would have started and at the very least his "re"election in 2004 would have been doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. so ..... that makes it okay they voted for the IWR?
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 12:23 AM by maggrwaggr
I don't follow your logic.

If I was living in Nazi Germany and I tried to stop the Holocaust, well, it wouldn't matter because "it was going to happen anyway".

So if I VOTED FOR the Holocaust, it also doesn't matter?

Listen, the people I want to support are the ones who FIGHT for what I believe in. Even if they lose, I want them to FIGHTI.

Got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Prominent Hammer?
These people should be impeached for their phallus-worship alone.

They are so unevolved. Do they ever THINK about what they're saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC